1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is Communication Climate
Definition: the social tone of a relationship
exist in all types of relationships and groups: workplace, romance, friendships, families, countries, cities
positive cmns climate = higher commitment jobs, creativity, comfortable learning envi.
negative cmns climate = foster hostility, tension, criticism, suspicion
cmcns climates change overtime like the weather
How Communication Climates Develop
Cmns climates are determined by the degree the individual feels valued by others
confriming cmms direct or indirect msgs includes: you exist/matter/important = make you feel appreciated and respected
disconfirming cmns : lack of regard, unimportance
every msgs whether it makes you feel appreciated or not are tied to confirming and disconfirming attitudes = it’s how we speak and act that shapes the climate
interpretation is subjective = need to understand relationship context
How Communication Climates Develop: Levels of Message Confirmation - 3 Tyeps of Confriming Messages
There is no guarantee that messages will always be interpreted as intended, but including these three types of messages = percieved as confirming
Recognition
the most fundamental form of confirmation = indicates awareness of other person’s existence
non-verbal: eye-contact, smile = acknowledgment of presence
verbal: i’ll be right with you, media replies indicates a future response from you
Acknowledgement
stronger form of confirmation = paying attention and understanding others
verbal: "I see your point” implies generosity through attention
Endorsement
= strongest type of confirming message = you agree or support the other person = highest form of valuing
non-verbal: mainting eye-contact, nodding when listening
verbal: agreeing, complimenting, praising
How Communication Climates Develop: 2 Types of Disagreeing Messages
Fall between confirming and disconfirming cmns and isn’t always easy to categorize
constructive disagreement: components of recognition and acknowledgement
deconstructive: wipes away any recognition or acknowledgement - You’re an Idiot
Argumentativeness
presenting and defending own' position while opposing the other
Positive climate: I disagree because… deliver arguments in a supportive affirming way
collectivist value high power distance
Complaining
expressing dissatisfaction when not prepared or wanting to engage in argument
constructive: behavioural complaints (you always do this)
destructive: aimed at personal characteristics = harder to forget (you’re such a slob)
How Communication Climates Develop: 2 Types of Disconfirming Messages
Are often subtle messages but are more damaging than disagreeing one = conveys you’re not valued
being ignored or interrupted = not valued
talking to someone who’s distracted = not important
Aggressiveness
attacking someone’s character, background, identity
Bullying = lower self-eseem, burnout, depression, death
Ostracism
excluding others from interaction
people would rather have neg. attention than no attention
silent treatment, ghosting = you can’t communicate = you don’t exist
Cause and Effects of Defensiveness
a predictable reaction to disagreeing or disconfirming msgs = pollute cmns climate
protecting presenting face’s image
occurs when critcism are perceived as untrue attacks (a friend calling you self-centred when you’re not)
individualistic ppl are more likely to deflect criticism
communual are more likely to interpret ambiguous msgs as supportive and accept criticism
competent communicators protect face by offering constructive criticism. 911 reciervers soften inquires by using Can you instead of Tell me = sounds more like a request and maintains a supportive climate
Climate Patterns
cmns climates naturally perpetuate themselves forming either positive or negative spirals
spirals aren’t permanent
successful relationships = ability to interrupt negative patterns and recover
facilitated by conscious efforts to de-escalate, strong cmns
perpetuation is driven by reciprocity = individuals match cmns style to partner
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories
since cmns is complex Gibb Categories offers strategies to send supportive/positive messages and build positive relational climates
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories : Evaluation vs. Description
Evaluation = defensive bhvr
judging the other person
lacks explanation for your conclusions
uses YOU language = defensiveness
Description = supportive bhvr
a constructive way of expressing complaints, sharing thoughts and feelings without judging the listener
documented oversvations
focus on bhvr than can be changed
uses I language (I feel unimportant when)
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories : Controlling Cmns vs. Problem Orientation
Control = defensive bhvr
sender forces their solution to receiver = disregards receiver’s needs or interests
achieved through status or physical power
generates hosility = entails “I know what’s best for you”
Problem Orientation = Supportive bhvr
collaborative solution finding that satisfies the needs of all parties
achieves an outcome where everyone wins
uses we language = decisions are made with others and not for them
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories : Strategy vs. Spontaneity
Strategy = defensive bhvr
speaker hides ulterior motives = dishonesty and manipulation
provides limited info to make to trap others into refusion
listeners use defense mechanism (why do you want to know?)
Spontaneity
being the most honest without manipulation
self-disclosure should still be in mind
sets aside hidden agendas
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories : Neutrality vs. Empathy
Neutrality = defensive bhvr
lack of concern for the other’s welfare = unimportant
disconfirming
evokes hostility
Empathy = supportive bhvr
ability to understand person’s pov
removes indifference in cmns
reduces threats of person’s self-concept
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories : Superiority vs. Equality
Superiority = defensive bhvr
sending patronizing messages (I’m better than you)
leads to dislike = defensiveness
Equality = supportive bhvr
conveying respect
communicates in a way that uplifts both parties = equal worth
Creating Supportive Climates : Gibb Categories : Certainty vs. Provisionalism
Certainty = defensive bhvr
claim to be absolutely right and believe their way is right without needing more info
disregards others’ ideas = lack of respect for others
uses never, always, must
Provisionalism = supportive bhvr
expresses openness to others’ ideas and opinions
aids discussion through open-minded messages
uses maybe, might, possibly
Invitational Communication
where participants create an environment for growth and change without the motive of changing others
welcoms other’s viewpoints, open-minded listening, criticizes msgs without affending personal beliefs
climate based on value, safety, freedom
Incivility cmns = gaslighting, ghosting, bullying
Invitational Communication : The Language of Choice
limit use of obligatory language (I have to/should/can’t) = pressure and obligation = lack of motivation
instead of power of choice-oriented language (I’m going to/will/decided) = reflect personal choice = sense of empowerment = motivation and control
adopts invitational attitude that values your own and others’ freedom, safety, and input and dialogue
freedom of choice (you are free to say no)
Invitational Communication : Responding Non-defensively to Criticism
Seek more information
Agree with the critic
seek more information
before reacting to criticism try to understand the person’s perspective
listen open-mindedly eithout accepting criticism
allows you to better explain your position if you disagree or acknowledge if criticism is valid
Can seek more info by asking for clarification, guessing the specifics of complaint (was it my?), or paraphrasing their thoughts and feelings = show you’re engaged and aids uncovering their objections
Agree with critic
acknowledging and accepting their pov while maintaining your stance
avoids unproductive arguments = respectful cmns climate
Can agree with critic through valid facts (you’re right. I am angry), in principle, or perception (I see how that may come off offensive)