Media law final

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/51

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

52 Terms

1
New cards

Why do judges worry about prejudicial publicity?

It can bias jurors and threaten a defendant’s right to a fair trial.

2
New cards

What are ways judges control prejudicial publicity?

Gag orders, change of venue, jury sequestration, continuances, careful jury selection.

3
New cards

Pros of cameras in courtrooms?

Transparency, public education, judicial accountability.

4
New cards

Cons of cameras in courtrooms?

Witness intimidation, sensationalism, influencing trial behavior.

5
New cards

Why don’t reporters want to testify?

To protect confidential sources and maintain independence.

6
New cards

What are shield laws?

State laws that protect journalists from revealing sources.

7
New cards

What does the First Amendment protect regarding the press?

Freedom to publish news without censorship.

8
New cards

What does the Sixth Amendment protect?

Right to a fair and speedy trial.

9
New cards

Main takeaway from Nebraska Press Ass’n v. Stuart?

Gag orders on the press are rarely constitutional.

10
New cards

Main takeaway from Chandler v. Florida?

Cameras allowed if they don't threaten fair trials.

11
New cards

What was the ruling in Branzburg v. Hayes?

No absolute First Amendment privilege for reporters to avoid testifying.

12
New cards

What law protects journalists from newsroom searches?

Privacy Protection Act.

13
New cards

Justice Stewart’s Three-Part Test?

1. Relevant info, 2. Cannot be obtained elsewhere, 3. Compelling interest.

14
New cards

privacy protection act (1980)

protecting journalists and newsrooms from government searches for their work product and documentary materials, even in criminal investigations.

15
New cards

What types of immoral speech have been regulated?

Blasphemy, Darwinism, immoral advocacy, obscenity.

16
New cards

What case protected movies criticizing religion?

Burstyn v. Wilson.

17
New cards

What case protected advocacy of immoral ideas?

Kingsley v. Regents.

18
New cards

What case protected teaching evolution?

A: Epperson v. Arkansas

19
New cards

Why is obscenity not protected?

It has no essential social value.

20
New cards

What case first ruled obscenity unprotected?

Roth v. United States

21
New cards

What test defines obscenity today?

A: Miller Test from Miller v. California. The test assesses whether the material appeals to a prurient interest, depicts patently offensive sexual conduct, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. 

22
New cards

Three parts of the Miller Test?

1. Prurient interest, 2. Patently offensive, 3. Lacks serious value.

23
New cards

How does the FCC regulate broadcast obscenity?

Total ban on obscene material; limits on indecent material during daytime.

24
New cards

What happened to the Communications Decency Act?

Struck down as unconstitutional.

25
New cards

What agency regulates deceptive ads?

Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

26
New cards

What is deceptive advertising?

Misleading material that affects consumer decisions.

27
New cards

What is puffery?

Exaggerated claims not meant to be taken literally.

28
New cards

What case first denied First Amendment protection to ads?

Valentine v. Chrestensen.

29
New cards

What case protected advertising lawful services?

Bigelow v. Virginia.

30
New cards

What is the three-part test for regulating commercial speech?

1. Substantial interest, 2. Advances interest, 3. Not overly broad.

31
New cards

What is prior restraint?

Government censorship before publication.

32
New cards

Prior restraint vs. post facto punishment?

Prior restraint = censorship beforehand; Post facto = punishment after.

33
New cards

What case made prior restraints presumptively unconstitutional?

Near v. Minnesota.

34
New cards

What was the Pentagon Papers case?

NY Times v. U.S. — government couldn't block publication.

35
New cards

When is prior restraint allowed?

Rarely — for serious national security, violence, or obscenity threats.

36
New cards

What are fighting words?

Words that provoke immediate violence.

37
New cards

Why aren't fighting words protected?

They don't contribute to public debate or ideas.

38
New cards

What case defined fighting words?

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.

39
New cards

What case protected offensive but nonviolent speech?

Cohen v. California ("F*** the Draft" jacket).

40
New cards

Can hate speech be punished?

Only if it crosses into true threats or fighting words.

41
New cards

What does copyright protect?

Original creative works like books, music, software.

42
New cards

What are the penalties for copyright violation?

Civil lawsuits and criminal charges.

43
New cards

What is fair use?

Limited use of copyrighted material without permission.

44
New cards

Four factors of fair use?

Purpose, nature, amount used, effect on market.

45
New cards

What case limited fair use for unpublished material?

Harper & Row v. Nation.

46
New cards

What case confirmed parody as fair use?

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose.

47
New cards

Can the government restrict journalist access?

Yes — to military bases, crime scenes, classified info.

48
New cards

What law gives access to government records?

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

49
New cards

Three FOIA exceptions?

National security, law enforcement, personal privacy.

50
New cards

Are newspapers required to give access to all viewpoints?

no

51
New cards

Are broadcasters regulated more than newspapers?

Yes, because airwaves are limited.

52
New cards

What is the Equal Opportunity Rule?

Political candidates must be given equal broadcast time.