Financial Institutions

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

The three pillars of the Basel III framework are the maintenance of minimum levels of capital, liquidity, and stable funding

  • Minimum required capital for a bank is based on the risk of the bank’s assets. The riskier a bank’s assets are, the higher its required capital

  • Basel III specifies that a bank should hold enough liquid assets to meet demands under a 30-day liquidity stress scenario

  • The Basel III framework requires stable funding relative to a bank’s liquidity needs over a one-year time horizon.

2
New cards

CAMELS approach to analysing a bank

The CAMELS approach is a six-factor analysis of a bank, including capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity.

3
New cards

Capital Adequacy

To prevent financial insolvency, a bank must maintain adequate capital to sustain business losses

Capital adequacy is based on risk-weighted assets (RWAs); more risky assets require a higher level of capital

4
New cards

Basel III defines a bank’s capital in a tiered, hierarchal approach:

  1. Tier 1 capital

    • Common Equity Tier 1 capital: common stock, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, and OCI less intangibles and deferred tax losses

    • Other Tier 1 capital: subordinated instruments with no specified maturity and no contractual dividends (like preferred stock with discretionary dividends)

  2. Tier 2 capital: subordinated investments with original maturity of more than 5 years

Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital makes up the total capital of a bank.

Basel III guidelines specify a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital of 4.5% of RWA, minimum total Tier 1 capital of 6% RWA, and minimum total capital of 8% of RWA

5
New cards

Asset Quality

current and potential credit risk associated with bank assets (such as bad loans)

6
New cards

Management capabilities

A bank’s internal control and governance systems (including an independent board) ensure that managers do not take undue risks or engage in self-serving behavior

7
New cards

Earnings

Earnings are considered high quality if they are adequate as well as sustainable

8
New cards

For a typical bank, major sources of earnings are:

  1. Net interest income

  2. Service income

  3. Trading income (least sustainable/ volatile year-to-year)

9
New cards

Liquidity

Basel III framework introduced two minimum liquidity standards:

  1. Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR): is calculated as the value of a bank’s highly liquid assets divided by its expected cash outflows.

LCR = highly liquid assets / expected cash outflows

LCR estimates liquidity needs in a stress scenario - 30 day horizon

  1. Net stable funding ratio (NSFR): is the percentage of required stable funding that is sourced from available stable funding.

NSFR = available stable funding / required stable funding

NSFR relates the liquidity needs of a bank’s assets to the liquidity provided by the bank’s liabilities (funding sources) - one year horizon

The standards recommend a minimum NSFR of 100% and minimum LCR of 100%

Under liquidity, “concentration of funding” and “maturity mismatch” are issues

10
New cards

Sensitivity to Market Risk

A bank’s interest rate risk is the result of the differences in maturity, rates, and repricing frequency between the bank’s assets and its liabilities.

11
New cards

Other factors in analysing a bank

  • Government support

  • Government ownership

  • Bank mission (global banks have a well-diversified asset base, community banks have a focus on a single industry)

  • Culture (risk-taking or not)

12
New cards

P&C vs L&H Insurers

  • P&C: lumpier claims, shorter float, longer hard pricing periods, shorter claim periods

  • L&H: predictable claims, longer float, longer soft pricing periods, longer claim periods. The relative predictability of L&H insurers’ claims generally allows these companies to have lower capital requirements and to seek higher returns than P&C insurers.