Financial Institutions

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

The three pillars of the Basel III framework are the maintenance of minimum levels of capital, liquidity, and stable funding

  • Minimum required capital for a bank is based on the risk of the bank’s assets. The riskier a bank’s assets are, the higher its required capital

  • Basel III specifies that a bank should hold enough liquid assets to meet demands under a 30-day liquidity stress scenario

  • The Basel III framework requires stable funding relative to a bank’s liquidity needs over a one-year time horizon.

2
New cards

CAMELS approach to analysing a bank

The CAMELS approach is a six-factor analysis of a bank, including capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity.

3
New cards

Capital Adequacy

To prevent financial insolvency, a bank must maintain adequate capital to sustain business losses

Capital adequacy is based on risk-weighted assets (RWAs); more risky assets require a higher level of capital

4
New cards

Basel III defines a bank’s capital in a tiered, hierarchal approach:

  1. Tier 1 capital

    • Common Equity Tier 1 capital: common stock, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, and OCI less intangibles and deferred tax losses

    • Other Tier 1 capital: subordinated instruments with no specified maturity and no contractual dividends (like preferred stock with discretionary dividends)

  2. Tier 2 capital: subordinated investments with original maturity of more than 5 years

Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital makes up the total capital of a bank.

Basel III guidelines specify a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital of 4.5% of RWA, minimum total Tier 1 capital of 6% RWA, and minimum total capital of 8% of RWA

5
New cards

Asset Quality

current and potential credit risk associated with bank assets (such as bad loans)

6
New cards

Management capabilities

A bank’s internal control and governance systems (including an independent board) ensure that managers do not take undue risks or engage in self-serving behavior

7
New cards

Earnings

Earnings are considered high quality if they are adequate as well as sustainable

8
New cards

For a typical bank, major sources of earnings are:

  1. Net interest income

  2. Service income

  3. Trading income (least sustainable/ volatile year-to-year)

9
New cards

Liquidity

Basel III framework introduced two minimum liquidity standards:

  1. Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR): is calculated as the value of a bank’s highly liquid assets divided by its expected cash outflows.

LCR = highly liquid assets / expected cash outflows

LCR estimates liquidity needs in a stress scenario - 30 day horizon

  1. Net stable funding ratio (NSFR): is the percentage of required stable funding that is sourced from available stable funding.

NSFR = available stable funding / required stable funding

NSFR relates the liquidity needs of a bank’s assets to the liquidity provided by the bank’s liabilities (funding sources) - one year horizon

The standards recommend a minimum NSFR of 100% and minimum LCR of 100%

Under liquidity, “concentration of funding” and “maturity mismatch” are issues

10
New cards

Sensitivity to Market Risk

A bank’s interest rate risk is the result of the differences in maturity, rates, and repricing frequency between the bank’s assets and its liabilities.

11
New cards

Other factors in analysing a bank

  • Government support

  • Government ownership

  • Bank mission (global banks have a well-diversified asset base, community banks have a focus on a single industry)

  • Culture (risk-taking or not)

12
New cards

P&C vs L&H Insurers

  • P&C: lumpier claims, shorter float, longer hard pricing periods, shorter claim periods

  • L&H: predictable claims, longer float, longer soft pricing periods, longer claim periods. The relative predictability of L&H insurers’ claims generally allows these companies to have lower capital requirements and to seek higher returns than P&C insurers.