1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Content Analysis
It is a research method used to systematically analyze the content of communication (such as text, speech, images, videos, or social media posts)
Content Analysis
It is use to identify patterns, themes, meanings, or frequencies of certain words, ideas, or symbols
1. To identify recurring themes and patterns.
2. To quantify qualitative data.
3. To understand social and cultural influences on behavior.
4. To track changes over time.
5. To provide insights for interventions and policies.
Purpose of Content Analysis in Psychology
Conceptual analysis
Relational analysis
General Types of Content Analysis
Conceptual analysis
focuses on identifying and counting the presence of certain concepts, words, or themes in a text
Conceptual analysis
A researcher analyzes 200 social media posts about stress among university students
Conceptual analysis
They code how many times the words “stress,” “burnout,” “anxiety,” or “pressure” are mentioned
Relational analysis
goes beyond just counting words or concepts
Relational analysis
It examines how concepts are related to each other within the text, focusing on the context and relationships between themes
Conceptual analysis
The goal is to see how often specific ideas appear to measure their significance
Relational analysis
The same researcher studies how “stress” is connected to other terms in the posts
Relational analysis
Example is “Stress” often co - occurs with “time management” and “lack of sleep.” and “Anxiety” is frequently linked to “exams” and “internet connection issues”
1. Systematic and Rule- Governed
2. Objective and Reliable
3. Both Quantitative and Qualitative
4. Content-Focused
5. Flexible Sources of Data
6. Non-Intrusive Method
7. Contextual and Interpretive
8. Replicable and Transparent
9. Reductive
10. Versatile and Interdisciplinary
Characteristics of Content Analysis as a Research Method
Quantitative Approach
A research approach that focuses on counting, measuring, and statistically analyzing the frequency or occurrence of certain words, themes, or categories within communication content.
Quantitative Approach
(Numbers, frequency, measurement)
Quantitative Approach
It answers “how much” or “how often.”
Qualitative Approach
(Meaning, interpretation, themes)
Qualitative Approach
A research approach that focuses on the meaning, context, and interpretation of communication content
Qualitative Approach
It explores latent content (the underlying message, emotions, or themes) rather than just frequencies
Content Analysis in Research
is studying communication content in a systematic way to uncover hidden patterns, meanings, and trends.
1. Define the research question.
2. Select the material (e.g., newspapers, interviews, TV ads, social media posts).
3. Develop categories or codes (keywords, themes, symbols).
4. Analyze, interpret patterns in the data and apply the categories systematically
5. Draw conclusions about the messages or meanings.
Steps in Content Analysis
Unobtrusive data collection
Transparent and replicable
Highly flexible
Content analysis is a readily-understood and an inexpensive research method
Advantages of Content Analysis in research
Unobtrusive data collection
Content analysis allows researchers to study behavior, attitudes, or cultural patterns without directly interacting with participants
Unobtrusive data collection
This reduces bias, as participants are not influenced by the researcher’s presence
Transparent and replicable
Content analysis uses clear coding rules and systematic procedures.
Transparent and replicable
This means other researchers can repeat the study, check the coding categories, and verify results. It strengthens reliability and scientific credibility
Highly flexible
Content analysis can be applied to different types of data (text, images, videos, social media posts, interviews) and adapted for quantitative (counting) or qualitative (interpretive) purposes
Content analysis is a readily-understood and an inexpensive research method
Content analysis is relatively easy to grasp compared to more complex research methods because it involves examining texts, documents, or media that are already available
Reductive
Subjective
Time intensive (Can be extremely time consuming)
Can be difficult to automate or computerize
Disadvantages of Content Analysis in research
Reductive
Content analysis often reduces rich, complex human communication into categories or codes
Reductive
This makes data manageable, it can oversimplify meanings and miss nuances (especially in emotions, sarcasm, or cultural context)
Subjective
Content analysis almost always involves some level of subjective interpretation, which can affect the reliability and validity of the results and conclusions, leading to various types of research bias and cognitive bias
Time intensive (Can be extremely time consuming)
Developing coding categories, training coders, and systematically analyzing large amounts of text, images, or videos can be very time-consuming
Can be difficult to automate or computerize
Automated software can help but often lacks subtle human interpretation
Can be difficult to automate or computerize
Automated analysis may miss sarcasm, metaphor, or emotional subtleties, leading to inaccurate or incomplete findings
To transform unstructured communication into structured analyzable data, allowing researchers to better understand human thought, emotion, and behavior in real-world contexts
The purpose of content analysis in psychology
Causal Comparative (Ex Post Facto) Design
investigates cause-and-effect relationships by comparing groups that already differ on an independent variable that the researcher cannot manipulate
Causal Comparative (Ex Post Facto) Design
This design aims to discover the reasons for existing group differences or the consequences of an event that has already happened.
Causal Comparative (Ex Post Facto) Design
This "after the fact" method is useful for studying phenomena where manipulation isn't possible but is limited by a lack of control over the independent variable and random assignment, making it difficult to establish definitive causality
Ex Post Facto design
is a nonexperimental research design where the researcher examines the effect of an independent variable after it has already occurred, without manipulation or random assignment
Retrospective analysis
Non-manipulation of variables
Focus on preexisting conditions
Inference of causality
Key characteristics of ex post facto research
Retrospective analysis
The study begins after the phenomena or event of interest has occurred
Non-manipulation of variables
The researcher does not change or assign the independent variable (e.g., weight, school type) to participants
Focus on preexisting conditions
The study groups participants based on characteristics they already possess
Inference of causality
The researcher aims to infer a cause-and-effect relationship, but with less certainty than a true experiment, as there is no random assignment
Correlational Studies
Criterion Group Studies
Two Main Types Of Ex Post Facto Research Designs
Correlational Studies
that aim to identify antecedents of a present condition
Correlational Studies
Example is the connection between stress and future job performance
Correlational Studies
Example is positive relationship between temperature and ice cream sales
Criterion Group Studies
that discover possible causes by comparing groups with and without the variable of interest
Criterion Group Studies
Example is research comparing job performance of skilled versus unskilled workers
Criterion Group Studies
Example is depressed and non -depressed individuals
1. The inability to establish definitive causality
2. The lack of random assignment and variable manipulation, a higher risk of third variables
3. The potential for inaccurate or incomplete data
Limitations of Ex Post Facto Research
1. Ethical advantage
2. Practical and feasible
3. Explores cause-and-effect relationships (tentatively)
4. Generates hypotheses for further research
5. Applicable across disciplines
Importance of Causal - Comparative (Ex Post Facto) Design