Psychology key science skills

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/49

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

50 Terms

1
New cards

Aim

To examine the effect of caffeine on short-term memory recall. A precise statement of what the study intends to investigate.

2
New cards

Hypothesis

A testable prediction including: population, IV, DV, and direction (e.g., increase/decrease).

Example: "Year 12 students who consume caffeine will recall more words than those who do not."

3
New cards

Independent Variable (IV)

The variable manipulated by the researcher.

4
New cards

Dependent Variable (DV)

The outcome measured and affected by the IV.

5
New cards

Controlled Variables

Factors kept constant to ensure validity.

6
New cards

Confounding Variables

Uncontrolled variables that affect the DV and may invalidate results.

7
New cards

Within-Subjects Design (Repeated Measures)

Same participants do all conditions. Controls for participant differences but may cause order effects.

Counterbalancing helps minimise these.

8
New cards

Between-Subjects Design (Independent Groups)

Participants are assigned to one condition only. No order effects but can suffer from participant differences. Random allocation helps reduce this bias.

9
New cards

Mixed Design

Combines within- and between-subjects methods. Useful for tracking individual changes over time and group differences.

10
New cards

Convenience Sampling

Selects participants who are easily available.

✅ Quick and easy.
❌ High bias; low external validity.

11
New cards

Random Sampling

Everyone in the population has an equal chance of being selected.

✅ Reduces bias; improves generalisability.

12
New cards

Stratified Sampling

Divides population into strata (e.g. age, gender) and samples proportionally.

✅ Highly representative; allows for group comparisons.

13
New cards

Random Allocation

Each participant has an equal chance of being in any condition.

✅ Controls participant variables and supports internal validity.

14
New cards

Random Errors

Unpredictable variations (e.g. mood, distractions).

15
New cards

Systematic Errors

Consistent bias due to issues like faulty equipment or poor sampling.

16
New cards

Personal Errors

Human mistakes like incorrect data recording.

17
New cards

Extraneous Variables

Other variables that might influence the DV. Must be controlled to maintain internal validity.

18
New cards

Confounding Variables (again)

Uncontrolled variables that impact the DV and can invalidate the study.

19
New cards

Standardised Instructions

Ensure every participant gets the same procedure to reduce bias.

20
New cards

Counterbalancing

Changing the order of conditions to reduce order effects like practice or fatigue.

21
New cards

Single Blind Procedure

Participant doesn't know which condition they're in.

22
New cards

Double Blind Procedure

Both participant and researcher are unaware of condition assignments.

23
New cards

Triple Blind Procedure

Participant, researcher, and data analysts are unaware of group allocations.

24
New cards

Case Study

In-depth study of one person or group.

✅ Rich detail.

❌ Low generalisability; no causation inferred.

25
New cards

Observational Study

Watching behaviour naturally or in a set-up.

✅ Realistic.

❌ May lack consent; observer bias possible.

26
New cards

Self-Reports

Surveys, questionnaires, or interviews.

✅ Efficient; good for subjective data.

❌ Prone to response bias.

27
New cards

Correlational Study

Measures strength/direction of a relationship.

✅ Good for ethically tricky studies.

❌ No causation inferred.

28
New cards

Simulation Study

Realistic re-creation of scenarios.

✅ Safe and controlled.

❌ May lack ecological validity.

29
New cards

Primary Data

Data collected directly by the researcher.

30
New cards

Secondary Data

Pre-existing data (e.g. ABS, other studies).

31
New cards

Quantitative Data

Numerical data – easy to analyse statistically.

32
New cards

Qualitative Data

Descriptive data – thoughts, feelings, behaviours.

33
New cards

Objective Data

Observable and measurable (e.g. reaction time). Not influenced by personal feelings.

34
New cards

Subjective Data

Based on personal opinions or self-reports.

35
New cards

Reliability

Consistency of results over time, observers, or tools.

36
New cards

Repeatability

Same method, same conditions, same results.

37
New cards

Reproducibility

Different researchers or settings get similar results.

38
New cards

Validity

The degree to which something measures what it's supposed to.

39
New cards

Internal Validity

Confidence that the IV caused changes in the DV.

40
New cards

External Validity

Generalisation of results to real-world settings.

41
New cards

Research Merit and Integrity

Study must be worthwhile, well-designed, and honestly reported.

42
New cards

Beneficence

Benefits must outweigh risks.

43
New cards

Justice

Fair distribution of risks and benefits among participants.

44
New cards

Respect

Participant rights and dignity must be upheld.

45
New cards

Confidentiality

Participants’ data must be protected and kept private.

46
New cards

Voluntary Participation

Participants must willingly choose to take part.

47
New cards

Informed Consent

Participants must be fully informed before agreeing to take part.

48
New cards

Withdrawal Rights

Participants can leave the study at any time without penalty.

49
New cards

Protection from Harm

Participants must not be exposed to any risk or harm.

50
New cards

Deception (with Debriefing)

If deception is used, a full explanation must be provided afterwards.