1/116
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Psychotherapy
refers to a particular process rather than just to any experience that leads to desirable psychological outcomes
planned, emotionally charged, confiding, interaction between a trained, socially sanctioned healer & a sufferer
healer seeks to relieve sufferer’s distress & disability
Behavior
any observable, measurable action, response, or habit that an individual exhibits in reaction to their internal state or external environment
Cognition
mental processes of thinking, perceiving, remembering, & evaluating that shape how a person interprets experiences, emotions, & behaviors
Affect
immediate, outward, observable expression of an emotion
facial expressions, tone of voice, or body language
History of Psychopathology
Spiritual models
Deuteronomy
Plato
Malleus malleficarum
Physiological models
Hippocrates (4 bodily humors)
Blood, Yellow bile, Black bile, Phlegm
“Moral treatment” 18th & 19th centuries
Philippe Pinel
William Tuke
Eli Todd
Dorothea Dix
Beginnings of treatment
Jean Charcot, Sigmund Freud, Josef Breuer
Hypnosis & Hysteria
Advent of Psychoanalysis--Freud
World War II
Reactions to psychoanalysis
Behaviorism & Humanism
Evidence-based treatments
Pathologizing Human Behavior
Evaluation of certain emotions, actions/behaviors, thoughts/cognitions as abnormal, unhealthy, &/or maladaptive
negatively impacts functioning &/or well-being
Medical model
psychiatry vs psychology
abnormal behavior occurs from organic brain dysfunction
Reflection of cultural & societal norms
homosexuality
Beginnings of Assessment
Sir Francis Galton
1st psychological tests
“anthropometric lab”
Alfred Binet
valid assessment of intellegence
educational accommodations
Robert Woodworth
military personality & psychopathology
DSM
1st edition published in 1952
5th edition published in 2022
“classicifcations” of psychopathology
explicit diagnoses: e.g. major depressive disorder
specific symptoms: markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities most of the day, nearly every day
atheoretical
shifting away from categories to dimensions
Rise of Psychopharmacotherapies
sedations vs treatment
heavy sedatives & hypnotics common in asylums
chlorpronazine (thorazine)
growth from 1960s onward
treatment for specific disorder categories
side effects vs clinical benefits
integration w/psychotherapy often most effective
client motivation = key
Integration with Medicine
team-based treatment models
psychotherapists
psychiatrists
social work
occupational therapists
physicians
Evidence-Based Practice
health care movement
therapy & assessment approaches must be validated by rigorous science
psychotherapies that are more effective than placebo/ no intervention
assessments that are valid & reliable tests of the underlying process
still guided by client & clinician preferences
integration of best available research w/clinical expertise in context of patient characteristics, culture & preferences
Research + clinical expertise + client characteristics/preferences/culture
Intergrative Practices
less focus on treating specific disorders
more focus on transdiagnostic treatments
psychotherapies function, in part, through “treatment mechanisms”
blends diff theoretical frameworks & evidence-based techniques to create a treatment plan for each client
Treatment Mechanisms
psychotherapies function, in part, through this
psychological processes that are changed by psychotherapy & lead to improved outcomes for clients
“active ingredients” of psychotherapy
help to prevent mental illness
factors that are changed by treatment & subsequently imporve outcomes
manualized treatments seek to act on these factors
may be “common factors”
e.g. increasing social support
or “specific factors”
e.g. increasing mindfulness
Understanding how treatments work to improve outcomes
Common factor: positive therapeutic relationship (through all psychotherapy approaches)
What are the psychological processes that are changed by treatment that ultimately improves symptoms & outcomes
Treatment Mechanisms Example
shared mechanisms across psychopathology
alcohol use disorder:
giving up important social, occupational, or hobbies
emotional difficulties
restlessness
PTSD:
not being interested in activites you once enjoyed
high negative/low positive emotions
restlessness
Correlational Research
observe & measure relationship between 2 variables
may be positive (move together), negative (opposite directions), or have none
pearson correlation coefficient ( r )
advantage:
great for observation
efficient
disadvantage:
3rd variable problem
can’t infer causation (bad at explaining)
Experimental Research
Used to study cause-effect relationship between an IV on a DV
Independent Variable
e.g. control vs treatment groups
waitlist vs. cognitive behavioral therapy
Dependent Variable
e.g. psychotherapy outcomes
depression symptoms
key: random assignment
advantages:
proves cause & effect
high control
standardization
evidence-based support
disadvantages:
artifical settings
ethical limits
rigid rules
narrow participants
RCT is an example of this
Psychotherapy Outcome Studies
comparing diff individual therapies
Does therapy work?
Better than no treatment?
How do different therapies compare?
Big push for “empirically supported” or “evidence-based” therapies
Randomized Control Trials
Experimental research within the context of an intervention
Important in determining how effective a treatment is
IV: manipulation of a type of treatment
DV: how a particular outcome is affected
random assignment
Individuals with a particular diagnosis/problem are divided into:
Treatment group
OR
Control group:
No treatment
Waitlist
Attention-control
Standard treatment
“Gold standard” of treatment research
Placebo Effects
In psychotherapy interventions
difficult to control
expectation that treatment will improve one’s outcome
Symptoms improve after receiving fake treatment, driven by their expectation & belief that treatment is real
Single Blind Studies
participants don’t know whether they’re receiving actual treatment or a placebo but researchers do
Double Blind Studies
breaking the blind
neither participants nor researchers know who’s receiving actual treatment & who is receiving placebo
Random Assignment
In RCTs everyone is assigned to a group
selection bias
existing systematic group differences occuring before an intervention
Null Hypothesis
H0
is no significant differences in depression score at follow-up
Alternative Hypothesis
Ha
is significant differences in depression score at follow-up
Hypothesis Testing Within RCTs
null hypothesis
alternative hypothesis
is there a “treatment effect?”
does independent variable produce a difference in dependent variable
does our outcome change between treatment vs control?
is this difference likely due to chance?
Problems with p-values
no info on how groups vary on the outcome variable
sensitive to sample size (N used to denote sample size)
Describing Effects
statistical significance
is the diff in our outcome likely chance?
magnitude of the effect
how strong is the effect?
effect sizes
clinical significant
is the diff in our outcome clinically significant?
Treatment Efficacy
how well treatments perform in controlled research studies
tightly controlled experimental research, really specific & done in a very controlled way
E.g. randomized control trials (RCTs) determine efficacy of a treatment; gold standard
have internal validity
how treatments function in optimal, controlled conditions
Treatment Effectiveness
how well interventions perform outside of research settings, in the real world
have high exteral validity
External validity: generalizes study findings to situations outside of study
how treatments function in real-world, messier conditions
Review Articles
synthesis of results of a collection of research studies on given topic to find answers to a specific research question or hypothesis
Meta-Analyses
statistical process that synthesizes results from similar studies on a given topic
where results from each study are analyzed & combined to obtain more reliable results
Individual Differences
Understanding how well treatments work between different individuals
Psychological Assessment
Why do clinicians assess people?
Gathering client info relevant to therapy:
presenting problems
e.g. symptoms, daily functioning, specific diagnoses
history
e.g. background, culture
personality
relationships
treatment targets
e.g. areas of strength/growth, therapy goals
intrapersonal: what’s happening inside the individual?
interpersonal: what’s happening between people?
systematic: how do family, community, & other systems affect the problem?
Personality trait
Objective personality testing
Projective personality testing
Case Conceptualization
working model of client
integration of assessment data
provides guidance for psychotherapy goals
active process that occurs explicitly & in partnership w/client
considered tool for building curiosity & interest, & engaging client
suggests pathways for reaching intermediate & ultimate goals
can lead to greater understanding of difficulties & a sense of mastery
Psychological Assessment Steps
determine reason for referral & presenting problem
choose what to assess
select method of assessment
gather assessment data
consider data & draw conclusions
convey conclusions to appropriate parties
Psychological Testing
Personality testing
Objective personality testing
Structured, doesn’t use clinician interpretation
Projective personality testing
Unstructured, uses clinician interpretation
Intelligence testing
g : Overall intellectual ability
Fluid: Flexible thinking/problem solving
Crystalized: Accumulation of knowledge
Neuropsychological testing
Personality Trait
Stable & consistent way of perceiving world & of behaving
Not merely a collection of individual traits or disconnected behaviors, but is structured, organized, & integrated
Emerges over time out of a matrix of biological & social influences
Objective Personality Testing
Factual, not influenced by personal opinions
Have standardized questions or statements, w/fixed-option responses
Advantages:
Simple instructions: simple scoring
Easier to establish reliability & validity
But how reliable & valid test actually is varies depending on assessment
Economical: can be given to groups or individuals
Disadvantages:
Responses may not indicate actual behavior
Some measures have poor validity
Respondents may more easily fake responses
Experience, culture, & context can influence question interpretation & responses
Projective Personality Testing
Unconscious, related to unrecognized thoughts or emotions
Performance based tests
Characteristics
completely unstructured
unstructured or ambiguous stimuli
forced to impose structure
method is indirect
freedom of response
many variables
ex:
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Hermann Rorschach used inkblots for psychiatric diagnosis
Observed responses of people to ambiguous situations (inkblots)
Reliability
stability/consistency of a measurement
results of an assessment for a person is consistent when administered repeatedly
example:
IQ score for a child is about the same when assessed in Fall semester and again in Spring semester
Validity
how accurately an assessment measures what it’s intended to measure
results of an assessment accurately measure what it’s designed to measure
example:
scale of extraversion measures extraversion & how liked person is by their peers
Reliability Effects Validity
Unreliability decreases test validity
Unreliability decreases our confidence that observed scores reflect “true” scores
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Several approaches of administering, scoring, interpreting results exist
Description
has 10 printed inkblots
10 black & white (& grays), 5 include colors
Administration
respondent tells what is seen
clinician records responses verbatim
Inquiriy
clinician asks for causes/prompts for responses; elaboration & clarification of responses
Scoring methods may vary, 3 criteria often used
location: area of card to which individual responds
content: nature of object perceived in inkblot
determinants: aspects of card that evoked response
Interpretation is complex, & subject to illusory correlation
Reliability & Validity
Reliability of scoring system is contentious
Clinicians often go w/vibes on interpretive approaches
Evidence of validity is debated
what can it assess?
what does it add?
Reliability and Validity of Projectives Difficult to Assess Because
difficult to establish
Many variations in:
instructions
methods of administration
number of cards used
type of scoring/interpretation system
Clinicians typically rely on qualitative impressions rather than computing scores
Lack of norms
How client’s responses compares to broader population
Intelligence
psychological construct
broad view:
Evaluates diff cognitive processes
Collection of diff cognitive processes
Mental activities necessary for developing knowledge including acquiring, transforming, storing, retrieving, & using info for everyday functioning
Different domains are evaluated w/diff tests
Attention, perception, memory, learning, language, thinking, conceptual understanding, problem solving, etc
Spearman’s “g”
generalized intelligence
overall intellectual ability
Raymond B. Cattell
2 factors under “g”
Fluid ability
Crystalized ability
Fluid Ability
think adapt & learn w/out a lot of prior info or practice in that area
free form
w/age goes down
flexible thinking/problem solving
Crystalized Ability
structure, built up, formed overtime
accumulation of knowledge
collection of facts, skills & info gathered through education & life experience
w/age goes up
IQ Measures
structured, standardized test administration
example measures:
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-5)
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)
Stanford Binet-5th edition
Neuropsychological Assessment
Assessments identify possible organic brain dysfunction
Traumatic injury
Cerebrovascular accidents
Tumors
Degenerative diseases
Nutritional deficiencies
Chronic alcohol/substance abuse
Toxic disorders
Results:
Identify severity of impairment
Establish prognosis
Informs treatment approach
Use of cognitive rehabilitation vs psychotherapy
Psychotherapy adaptations
Neuropsychology
study of relations between neurological functioning & behavior
focuses on brain injuries/illnesses & how they impact human functioning
Therapeutic Relationship
alliance between client & clinician including cooperation & rapport between both parties
begins w/1st contact
emphasis varies depending on type of psychotherapy
includes
trust
collaboration
empathy
cohesion
goal agreement
positive regard
affirmation
bidirectional feedback
client & therapist both consistetly share observations, insights, & data to guide treatment process
Clinical Interviewing
planned conversation between a clinician & client to gather info
each person contributes to the convo
each person’s responses influences the response of other person
Interview types:
social history interview
diagnostic interview
crisis interview
Elements of an Interview
Physical setting
Rapport building
Taking notes/recording sessions
Communication style
casual conversation
language
silence
listening
nonverbals
Types of questions
open-ended
facilitative “tell me more..”
clarifying
confronting
direct
Social History Interview
purposes
obtain thorough history of client
understand context in which problems are occuring
understand possible etiological mechanisms
potential causes of psychotherapy
What’s included?
Childhood/family history
Social & relationship history
Trauma history
Educational history
Occupational history
Medical history
Psychiatric history
Substance use history
Legal history
Sexual history
Religious beliefs
Hobbies
Diagnostic Interviewing
Used to formulate a formal DSM-based diagnostic picture of client
gather detailed health history & symptoms to make an accurate mental health diagnosis
unstructured interviews
open-ended, flexible question's based on clinician’s judgment
less reliable
structured interviews
follow strict, scripted set of questions
e.g., Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID)
ex: MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview
may miss important symptoms
Major Depressive Disorder
most of day, nearly every day, for 2 weeks…
Sad, depressed mood
Loss of interest/pleasure
Weight/appetite loss or gain
Insomnia or hypersomnia
Psychomotor agitation or retardation
Fatigue or loss of energy
Worthlessness or guilt
Difficulty thinking or concentrating
Recurrent thoughts of death/suicide
Other criteria:
Symptoms cause significant distress/impairment
Symptoms not attributable to effects of substance or another medical condition
Not better accounted for by another mental disorder
No evidence of previous manic episode
Typically recurrent
Episode length
Age of onset
Crisis Interview
conducted when somebody, self or other, in immediate danger
goals:
meet immediate problems of client
decrease distress
motivate client to seek treatment in appropriate place
keep client (& others) safe
involuntary hospitalization if necessary
what’s assessed?
ideation
plan
means
intent
Clinical Judgement
subjective form of decision-making
therapist relies on personal experience, memory, & in-the-moment impressions
clinican uses
expert knowledge
personal experience
client perspectives
Actuarial Judgement
objective form of decision-making
human guess is removed
clinician uses:
statistically determined probabilities
statistical formulas & historical data to predict patient outcomes
Actuarial vs Clinical Judgement
Actuarial prediction provides most accurate info for decision making
Clinical judgement subject to errors & bias
so what should we do?
statistical decision making can be problematic for rare, extreme events
don’t have statistical formulas for everything
misses what we don’t assess
“Broken leg rule”
statistical models almost always beat human intuition
except when a rare, decisive piece of real-world info exists outside model’s data
listen to data w/guidance from clinical judgement
Psychological Report
identifying info
refferal info
behavioral observations
history of the presenting problem
other important history
assessment results
diagnostic impressions
case conceptualization &/or conclusions
recommendations &/or treatment plan
Freud
influential in development of psychotherapy
trained in hypnosis + applied to treat psychopathology
hysteric & neurotic cases
psychosomatic conditions
case of Anna O
suffering from a variety of hysterical symptoms
wanted the opportunity to talk & have a “catharsis”
marked birth of psychoanalysis as the “talking cure”
Free Association
development of psychoanalysis
Psychoanalytic Theory
Intrapsychic influence on development of personality
Emphasis on:
the unconscious
Intrapsychic processes are outside of our awareness
early psychological development
Motivations, desires, anxieties occurring in childhood
Not exclusive to psychotherapy per se
Understanding broad human experience from the unconscious:
arts & culture
personality
psychopathology
Drive-Defense Model
Psychoanalytic Theory
Drive = instinct that drives behavior
sex & aggression
Defense = constraints against drives to avoid anxiety
Intrapsychic conflict between drives & defenses is inevitable
Behavior reflects a compromise between drives & defenses to address conflict
Conflict mediated by 3 structures of personality:
Id: our sexual & aggressive instinctual strivings
Ego: variety of functions that work together to determine the cost–benefit of expressing particular id urges
Super Ego: 2 aspects
our internalized values (i.e., our conscience)
our ego ideals (our criteria for feeling good about ourselves)
Structural Theory
Superego:
conscience thinking
driven by moral principles
societal norms + expectations dictate what a person “should” do
Id:
illogical, emotional, irrational thinking
driven by: pleasure principle
maximizing pleasure + minimizing pain dictates what a person “wants” to do
Ego:
logical, rational thinking
driven by reality principle
reality forces person to give up on fantasy so they can focus solely on meeting moral demands of society or maximizing pleasure
Compromise formation
structure of personality that functions to express desires, while taking into account potential anxiety & guilt caused by these desires
p-values
Is difference between groups (e.g., treatment v. control group) likely due to chance?
< .05 indicates outcome is likely not due to chance & can reject null hypothesis
is a significant difference between our groups
statistical significance
Effect Sizes
measure of absolute magnitiude of treatment effect independent of sample size
large samples &/or small standard errors can meet significance criteria w/out being meaningful effects
Cohen’s D
common measure of effect size
magnitude of diff between groups
diff in standard deviations (SD) between the means of groups on outcome variable
0 - .19: trivial effect
.20: small effect
.50: medium effect
.80+: large effect
Psychoanalytic Sources of Psychopathology
Maladaptive compromise formations:
more pain than pleasure
e.g. excessive anxiety, interpersonal conflict
excessive expression/inhibition of id, ego &/or superego
Failure to recognize & accept unconscious motivation
Problems occuring during psychosexual development
Regression
Fixation
Psychosexual Development
oral
focus on pleasure & satisfaction through mouth
anal
pressure to meet performance standards during toilet training
phallic
focus on anxiety around genitals
latency
focus on non-sexual experiences & other domains (e.g. school)
genital
full sexual maturity & ego development
Regression
returning to a form of satisfaction/functioning from an early stage as way of avoiding certain feelings or anxieties
psychoanalytic source of psychopathology
Fixation
focusing on a form of satisfaction within a particular stage
rigid clinging to a particular mode of satisfaction characteristic of that stage
psychoanalytic source of psychopathology
Psychodynamic Defense Mechanisms
repression
displacement
projection
reaction formation
sublimation
splitting
isolation of affect
rationalization
denial
undoing
intellectualization
Psychoanalytic Therapy
based more heavily in Freudian theory
Strongly focused on sexual & aggressive drive
highly intensive
frequent therapy sessions
multiple times per week
Psychodynamic Therapy
based in more contemporary thought
more contempered approach, still based in psychoanalytic theory
reduced emphasis on sexual/aggressive drives
less intensive
less frequent sessions, more typical of other types of psychotherapies
once per week
focuses on gaining insight into unconscious psychological forces thought to underlie target problems
Psychodynamic Focus of Therapy
Establishing a positive “working alliance”
strong therapeutic relationship
neutrality, empathy, non-judgmental
Addressing transference-countertransference
can damage the working alliance
Managing resistance
Defensive reactions that interfere w/therapy
Transference
When client transfers past feelings, drives, defenses onto therapist
Often repeating past experiences from a childhood figure
Unconscious transfer of past intrapsychic processes (e.g., feelings, drives, defenses) onto a person in the present
Due to a past relationship w/a significant childhood figure placed onto a present relationship
Example:
During childhood, client experienced violent urges toward their parents when scolded
In therapy as adult, when client is gently corrected for arriving late to session, they throw their phone at therapist
Countertransferencee
Clinician’s reaction to client’s transference
May be due to clinician’s past relationship w/a childhood figure
Example:
During childhood, therapist would go emotionally numb when hit by their siblings
When client throws their phone at therapist, therapist goes numb
Psychodynamic Therapeutic Techniques
Free association, the “talking cure”
Analysis of transference
Managing transference & countertransference
addressing ruptures in therapeutic relationship
Interpretation
attributing meaning to feelings, behaviors, & emotions
w/focus on unconscious processes that may be
impacting these experiences
Addressing resistance
identifying areas of avoidance & associated defense mechanisms
Free Association
the “talking cure”
keeping therapy sessions unstructured
allowing client to verbalize whatever comes to mind
making the unconscious, conscious
identifying defense mechanisms
accepting “unacceptable” aspects of self
Analysis of Transference
exploring early life experiences & unresolved childhood conflict
identifying false connection between past childhood conflicts & the present situation
Psychodynamic Treatment Mechanisms
insight
interpretation
meaning making of unconscious experiences
motivation to change
psychological mindedness
ego strength & frustration tolerance
self-exploration
relationship
positive & strong therapeutic alliance
trusting, gratifying, safe, nonjudgmental, relationship
management of transference/countertransference
Relational Therapy History
Freudian -—> Interpresonal
Harry Stack Sullivan
focused on severe psychopathology
interpersonal psychiatry
cultural & societal influence
Karen Horney
feminist psychology
challenged many Freudian views of women’s psychology
Object Relation Theory
developed from psychoanalytic theory
instinctual drives center on other people
unconsciously effect how we develop & behave
people internalize their experiences w/other people
internalized experiences = “objects”
human psychology based primarily in relationships
childhood development
relationships w/objects form at infancy
personality
behavior change from therapy
objects including one’s own personality is split into “selves”
e.g. “good me", “bad me”
Relational Therapy
influenced by developmental psychology
explores how your interactions w/others shape mental well-being & daily life
attachment theory
relationships from infancy persist into adult relationships
parental/care-taker relationships = most critical
Attachment Styles
secure
child becomes distressed when caregiver leaves, but is easily comforted when they return
insecure-avoidant attachment
child is indifferent to caregiver’s presence & avoids them upon return
insecure-resistant attachment
child is anxious before separation & shows ambivalene/resistance to caregiver upon their return
disorganized attachment
child displays a mix of behaviors that indicate confusion or fear toward their caregivers
Freudian vs Relational Approaches
Relational approaches share commonalities w/psychoanalytic theory & therapy but differ in important ways
Similarities:
early childhood experiences unconsciously influence personality & behaviors
interpreting unconscious experiences improves insight on intrapsychic processes
major focus in psychotherapy
Differences:
relationships drive personality & behavior, not sexual or aggressive instincts
clinician is a participant observer, not a neutral observer
clinician influences how client participates in session (& vice versa)
Relational Sources of Psychopathology
Unhealthy or traumatic relationships
insecure or disorganized attachment styles
overemphasis on relationship needs/desires
relationship history w/:
abuse
neglect
betrayal
instability
isolation
Internal conflict w/aspects of the self
difficulties integrating “bad” aspects
using defense mechanisms to keep aspects of self in the unconscious
rigid, dominate view of self
dissociation
loss of connection w/internal & external experiences & behaviors
motivated forgetting
avoiding upsetting experiences that conflict w/how one views one’s self
Focus of Relational Therapy
the therapeutic relationship
identifying how past relationships unconsciously effect present relationships
how relationship patterns have been helpful in the past, but unhelpful in the present
mutuality
enactment
understanding the meaning/purpose of symptoms
addressing what psychological problems symbolize
bringing different selves into consciousness
Mutuality
Recognition that client & clinician influence the relationship & development of empathy towards each other
Relationship is considered mutual because there is inevitably mutual influence, recognition, & empathy
A focus of relational therapy
Enactment
Similar to countertransference
Client intentionally elicits a specific response from clinician
Breaks neutrality & objectivity
Unconscious & unavoidable
Often repeats interpersonal patterns from childhood
Patient & therapist are drawn into & engage in neurotically based interactions, w/out awareness
Is most common cause of a disruption in alliance
Focus of relational therapy
Relational Therapeutic Techniques
Managing transference & countertransference
Addressing enactment when it occurs
Relationship tear & repair
Managing conflict within the therapeutic relationship
Asymmetrical disclosure
Limited self-disclosure from clinician
Imagining past social situations in the present
De-mystifying the unconscious
Unstructured, non-directive sessions
Use of free association & silence
Interpretation of unconscious material
“Going for the affect”
Helping client bring anxiety to consciousness & learn how to handle/regulate these feelings
reduces defense mechanisms
Relational Treatment Mechanisms
Therapeutic Relationship
breaking unhelpful relationship patterns
developing new approaches to managing relationships
New experiences
seeking new social interactions
developing outside relationships
Increased insight
awareness of unconsious processes
understanding relationship patterns
experienceing relationship grief
Carl Rogers
Early work focused on psychotherapy among children
Research-oriented
Developed Person-Centered Therapy
also called “client-centered”
interested in growth, harnessing peoples’ potentials
all people have inherent worth & value
not defined by what they do or contribute
Person-Centered Therapy
personality is a structure in process
humans are constantly changing
unlimited potential to learn & grow
rooted in the phenomenological tradition
the phenomenal field
everything experienced by a person in a given time
determines all human behavior
the phenomenal self, “I”
updating sense of self to form a single, cohesive phenomenal self
integration between self-concept w/personal experiences is key to psychological health
congruence
incongruence
assess client–therapist relationship & unconditional positive regard to promote full growth potential
The Phenomenal Self
Self-concept or sense of self
Dialectical constructivism
Change → Updates to phenomenal self
Different selves depending on environmental needs
Congruence
Strong integration between self-concept & experience
Incongruence
Poor integration between self-concept & experience
primary cause of disfunction
Person Centered Theory Sources of Psychopathology
Threats to the phenomenal self
unresolved incongruence
disconnection & difficulties integrating selves & experiences
rigid self-view
Conditions of worth
beliefs that one’s value must conform to the values of others
Difficulties learning from past experiences
maladaptive coping
difficulties learning that thoughts, emotions, & behaviors that were helpful in previous environments are less helpful in current environment
Person Centered Focus of Therapy
Emphasis on emotions & feelings
emotions ≠ feelings
emotion: specific event, duration shorter than moods, & have a clear identifiable trigger, more intense
emotions & feelings are adaptive
primary adaptive emotions vs dysfunctional responses
secondary emotions
complex feelings, develop in response to initial, automatic primary emotion
instrumental emotions
serve functional purpose or help achieve specific goal
Learning difficulties
overlearning
overapplying learning to situations where they’re not helpful
Self-actualization
tendency for people to maintain & enhance themselves
Focus on the present
Self Discovery