1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Perspectives on Emotion
Conventional “common-sense” view
We see bear → become afraid → run
James-Lange view
We see bear → run → become afraid
Both view behavior and emotion as causally dependent
Causal Relations Between Emotion and Behavior
Need some way to measure emotion
Strong emotional responses have physiological components (heart rate, blood pressure)
Kelly, Brady, & Plumlee (1969) purpose
Analyze relations between behavioral and physiological changes
Kelly, Brady, & Plumlee (1969) methods
Measures food-reinforced behavior (lever pressing) and physiological changes (heart rate, blood pressure) in a conditioned suppression procedure
Kelly, Brady, & Plumlee (1969) results
Behavioral and physiological changes occurred independently
Lever pressing changed more quickly than physiological changes during conditioning, and recovered more quickly than physiological changes during extinction
Kelly, Brady, & Plumlee (1969) implications
Behavioral and physiological responses were both related to the contingencies but not to each other
Separate responses to the same event
Casual Relations Revisited
We see bear → we run and are afraid (behavioral approach from Skinner)
Casual independence of behavior and emotion
The running and the fright are both dependent on the contingencies, but not to each other
Learned Helplessness
An animal is exposed to an inescapable and severe aversive stimulation
When there is a punishing stimulus that you can not escape from you give up, even when there is a presentation of a chance to escape you dont take that opportunity because of your previous history.
Seligman presented an inescapable shock to dogs
No response that the dog could make would eliminate the shock, so they eventually gave up on trying to escape
Eventually, the animal gives up and stops attempting to escape
Even when an escape contingency is presented they never contact the contingency
Learned helplessness can be…
generalized to other behaviors
Implications for controlling behavior
When people are exposed to inescapable “shocks”, they may learn to give up and become helpless
Dont administer aversives noncontingently (not knowing when you will get punished)
Depression is a…
category and label
Inescapable abuse is highly associated with
depression
treatment for depression
force the organism to make the escape response
get the person to little by little engage in behavior to contact reinforcement. Get them to have the opportunity to contact reinforcement, which will then lead them to want to engage in behavior more and then will eventually learn to do it on their own. Learn to change, but first force them to start change
Force the depressed person to…
encounter reinforcers, to succeed
Then they may learn to do it on their own
Avoiding Depression:
Teaching people an escape response early on
This also generalizes. Even if the behavior changes, people are more likely to learn it.
Respondent is…
reflexive — automatically
Respondent Aggression
Fighting is generated when two organisms are in the same setting and painful stimuli are administered
Includes humans
Ex: yell at your partner because you have a headache
Dimensions of Respondent Aggression
Higher frequency shock caused more fighting
Higher intensity caused more fighting, up to a point
Above 2 MA, rats ran away
Allowing escape eliminated aggression
Smaller chamber = more aggression
Operant Aggression:
Removal of the person delivering aversive stimulation
Hitting someone who is annoying you so that they go away
Studying Operant Aggression
Deception
People are told that they are hurting an unseen participant, but they are not
Aggression Breeds Aggression
People respond to attacks with a stronger counterattack
Verbal insults can trigger physical aggression more than task frustration
Especially in the US
Dignity and honor are at stake
Excluding people can cause physical retaliation
Lab analog of school violence. This can be prevented with SR+
Can excluding people cause retaliation?
Social Disruption
When individuals attempt to escape from or avoid the punishing person or setting
Decreases the ability of a person to administer future reinforcers and punishers
For sidman, coercion involves
the basic contingencies of punishment and negative reinforcement
control of behavior through aversive contingencies
“Coercion and its Fallout” is by…
Sidman
Ferster: control that uses disproportionate consequences
“Clean your room or you don’t get food today”
A misuse of power
Control over environment
No one is benefiting
Longer-term benefits accrue to the controller
No long-term benefits to the controller; potentially, large costs
examples of a misuse of power through coercion:
Detention for talking vs. reinforcement for reading
Mafia
U.S. Government
coercion is not the same as
control
control is…
everywhere
coercion is…
not everywhere
Coercion systems lead to drop-outs
Shrinking taxes
Quitting school
Moral of the story: use positive reinforcement