1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Murray
Poor socialisation and the underclass - families dependent on the welfare state (benefits), a perverse incentive
Lone mothers do not fully socialise their children and absent fathers means boys particularly are more likely to commit crime
Dennis
Social controls have weakened in the family and in the community (inadequate socialisation)
Wilson & Herrnstein
Some people are likely to become criminal because it is in their personality
Some people are more aggressive. May lie and cheat and steal as part of their character
Low intelligence also leads to criminal behaviour
Clarke - Rational choice theory
Individuals are free beings - they have social agency and free will
People can choose whether to commit crime
They are capable of weighing up reward versus risk
Wilson & Kelling - Broken Windows thesis
Unless incivilities (litter, graffiti, noise levels etc.) are kept minimal, then wider antisocial behaviour and more serious crimes will follow
Fix immediately
Advocate the police adopting a policy of ‘zero-tolerance’ for even minor crimes
Solutions to crime
Main focus is control, containment and punishment - zero tolerance policies (Wilson & Kelling) and target hardening measures - reshaping the area
Increasing the costs to exceed the benefits
Responsible parenting, ‘active citizens’ - Murray
Tough punishment, heavy fines, sentences and advocation of corporal and capital punishment
Criticisms
Ignores wider structural issues such as poverty
Where zero tolerance is introduced, this simply shifts crime to other areas
It is easy to pick on a scapegoat like single parent families
Only looks at working class crime, corporate crime gets ignored by the authorities (Marxists)