Factorial Between-Participants ANOVA III & Higher-Order Designs

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/58

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards cover manipulation checks, factorial terminology (main effects, interactions, simple effects), three-way ANOVA procedures (omnibus tests, follow-ups), effect sizes, structural models, degrees of freedom, interpretation cautions, example findings from the lecture’s hiring-bias study, and practical assessment reminders.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

59 Terms

1
New cards

What is a manipulation check in experimental research?

A measure used to verify that participants interpreted or experienced the IV manipulation as intended.

2
New cards

When is a manipulation check especially important?

When the independent variable is psychological/unobservable and cannot be directly verified (e.g., distraction via loud music).

3
New cards

In a 3×2 alcohol (0,2,4 pints) × distraction (distracted, control) design, which omnibus test should be significant to confirm the distraction manipulation worked?

The main effect of distraction on the manipulation-check DV (scores should be higher in the distracted condition).

4
New cards

Which omnibus tests should be non-significant when validating the distraction manipulation in the same study?

The main effect of alcohol consumption and the Alcohol × Distraction interaction on the manipulation-check DV.

5
New cards

How are main effects defined in factorial ANOVA?

Differences between marginal means of one factor, averaging (collapsing) over all other factors.

6
New cards

What is a simple effect in two-way ANOVA?

The effect of one factor at each level of a second factor (comparison of cell means, ignoring other factors).

7
New cards

Define ‘simple comparison.’

A follow-up (usually t-test/contrast) that pinpoints which specific cell means differ within a significant simple effect.

8
New cards

What additional sources of variance are introduced in a three-way ANOVA compared with a two-way ANOVA?

One new main effect (Factor C), two new two-way interactions (A×C, B×C), and one three-way interaction (A×B×C).

9
New cards

How many omnibus tests exist in a 3-way ANOVA?

Seven: 3 main effects, 3 two-way interactions, 1 three-way interaction.

10
New cards

Write the structural model for a three-way between-participants ANOVA.

Xijkl = μ + αj + βk + γl + αβjk + αγjl + βγkl + αβγjkl + εijkl

11
New cards

What is the df formula for a main effect of a factor with ‘a’ levels?

df = a – 1

12
New cards

Give the df for an A×B×C interaction.

(a – 1)(b – 1)(c – 1)

13
New cards

How do you calculate error df in a fully crossed between-participants factorial design?

df_error = N – (number of cells)

14
New cards

Why can main effects be misleading when qualified by interactions?

Because the effect of a factor may differ across levels of another factor, making the averaged main effect unrepresentative.

15
New cards

In three-way ANOVA, are two-way interactions evaluated with cell means or special marginal means?

With marginal means averaged over the third factor (not raw cell means).

16
New cards

What does a significant three-way interaction indicate conceptually?

That a two-way interaction between two factors changes across levels of a third factor.

17
New cards

List the three steps for following up a significant three-way interaction.

1) Test simple interactions (two-way interactions at each level of the third factor). 2) If significant, test simple-simple effects (one factor at each level of the second factor within the third). 3) If factor >2 levels, conduct simple-simple comparisons to locate specific differences.

18
New cards

How do you decide which simple interactions to explore after a three-way interaction?

Base the choice on theoretical hypotheses and research questions—examine interactions most relevant to them.

19
New cards

In the hiring-bias example, what were the three factors?

Candidate Attractiveness (low, average, high), Candidate Gender (female, male), Participant Gender (female, male).

20
New cards

How many cells are in a 3 (Attractiveness) × 2 (Cand Gender) × 2 (Part Gender) design?

3 × 2 × 2 = 12 cells.

21
New cards

What simple interaction set was chosen for the hiring-bias example, and why?

Candidate Attractiveness × Candidate Gender at each level of Participant Gender, because the core question concerned how attractiveness effects depend on both candidate and evaluator gender.

22
New cards

Differentiate omnibus vs. simple two-way interactions in a three-way design.

Omnibus: interaction of two factors averaged over the third factor; Simple: interaction of two factors tested separately at each level of the third factor.

23
New cards

What is η² (eta squared)?

An effect-size measure for ANOVA representing proportion of total variance accounted for by a factor.

24
New cards

What is ω² (omega squared) and why might it be preferred?

An adjusted effect-size measure for ANOVA providing a less biased estimate of population effect size.

25
New cards

Which effect-size measure is commonly reported for t-tests?

Cohen’s d.

26
New cards

What is the guideline for plotting a three-way interaction line graph?

Y-axis: DV; X-axis: factor with most levels or theoretical priority; lines: second-most important factor; separate panels: least important factor.

27
New cards

Describe familywise error rate concern in higher-order follow-up testing.

Running many follow-up tests increases the probability of Type I errors across the family of comparisons.

28
New cards

Name two strategies to manage excessive follow-up tests in complex ANOVA.

(1) Conduct only tests that address hypotheses; (2) control error rate with adjustments (e.g., Bonferroni).

29
New cards

What practical skills will be assessed in Practical Test 3 (Week 6)?

Interpreting SPSS output for main-effect comparisons in a two-way ANOVA to decide significance and describe directions.

30
New cards

When following up a significant main effect with >2 levels, what test is run?

Main-effect comparisons (e.g., pairwise t-tests or linear contrasts) to see which marginal means differ.

31
New cards

If Factor = 2 levels, is a main-effect follow-up test needed?

No; direction is obvious from the two marginal means.

32
New cards

What is a ‘simple simple comparison’?

A pairwise comparison among cell means used after a significant simple simple effect (factor >2 levels) within a three-way design.

33
New cards

How many potential follow-up tests could exist in a full, exhaustive analysis of a 3-way ANOVA (per lecture example)?

57 tests (7 omnibus + 1 main-effect comparison + 14 simple effects + 7 simple interactions + 16 simple simple effects + 12 simple simple comparisons).

34
New cards

Why might researchers skip follow-ups for certain significant lower-order effects?

Because those effects are peripheral or qualified by higher-order interactions that render them less interpretable.

35
New cards

Explain the difference between η² and partial η² (ηp²).

η² uses total variance in the denominator; partial η² uses variance remaining after excluding other effects, making values larger.

36
New cards

Define ‘complex ANOVA.’

Another term for higher-order factorial designs (e.g., 3-way or 4-way ANOVA).

37
New cards

What is the purpose of a ‘common mistakes’ document for assessments?

To highlight frequent student errors (e.g., confusing main vs. simple effects) and guide correct reporting in practical tests.

38
New cards

Give an example of correctly reporting a significant simple effect.

‘Creativity scores were significantly higher in the distracted condition than the control condition for participants who consumed 0 pints, F(1, ??) = …, p = …’ (specifying both conditions).

39
New cards

What is the preferred order when interpreting effects in a complex ANOVA?

Start with the highest-order significant interaction, then move to lower-order interactions, then main effects.

40
New cards

What are ‘simple simple effects’ used for?

To understand how a factor’s effect varies across every combination of two other factors after a significant simple interaction.

41
New cards

Why must manipulation-check analyses use the same ANOVA design as the main DV?

To verify that the manipulation behaved consistently across all factors in the experimental structure.

42
New cards

If a three-level factor shows a significant main effect, but pairwise comparisons reveal only low ≠ average and low ≠ high, how would you summarise?

Participants differed only between low vs. average and low vs. high; average and high did not differ significantly.

43
New cards

In SPSS, which table provides omnibus F-tests for factorial ANOVA?

The ‘Tests of Between-Subjects Effects’ table.

44
New cards

Which SPSS procedure is used to get main-effect pairwise comparisons?

EMMEANS (Estimated Marginal Means) with pairwise or ‘Compare main effects’ options.

45
New cards

How is MS (mean square) calculated?

MS = SS / df.

46
New cards

Formula for F-statistic in ANOVA.

F = MSeffect / MSerror.

47
New cards

Why average over other factors when computing a main effect?

To isolate the pure effect of one factor independent of interactions.

48
New cards

What does ‘qualified by an interaction’ mean?

A main effect or lower-order interaction changes in magnitude or direction depending on another factor.

49
New cards

What is Deep vs. Normal breathing in the video-game example?

Levels of Factor 2: Breathing Method.

50
New cards

How many marginal means are compared for a 3-level main effect?

Three marginal means (one per level).

51
New cards

Give a caution when interpreting non-significant manipulation checks.

They suggest the manipulation may not have worked, threatening internal validity.

52
New cards

How many simple effects exist for Factor A in a 3-way design?

At each level of B and C (b+c) if B or C have 2+ levels; specifically, 2 at each level of the other factors. In the example: 2 (gender) + 2 (participant gender) = 4 simple effects for A.

53
New cards

What is the recommended graph layout for presenting simple interactions?

Separate graphs for the third factor, lines for the second factor, x-axis for the first factor.

54
New cards

Describe the hiring-bias result pattern for female participants rating female candidates.

Low = Average > High attractiveness ratings (high attractiveness penalised).

55
New cards

Describe the pattern for female participants rating male candidates.

Low < Average < High (higher attractiveness rewarded).

56
New cards

Describe the pattern for male participants rating male candidates.

Low = Average > High (high attractiveness penalised).

57
New cards

Describe the pattern for male participants rating female candidates.

Low < Average < High (higher attractiveness rewarded).

58
New cards

Which weeks in the course cover Regression topics following ANOVA?

Week 6 (Correlation + Standard Multiple Regression) and Week 7 (Standard & Hierarchical Multiple Regression).

59
New cards

What is a quasi-experiment?

A design where participants are not randomly assigned to all factor levels, often using pre-existing groups (e.g., participant gender).