1/75
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What should you do if you think peer-given feedback is wrong?
Talk to the instructor
What’s one way to improve feedback?
Give discretion and ask for the desired type of feedback
Steps in giving peer feedback
Listen to the writer
Be kind
Comment on the higher-order concerns first
Use “I” statements
Be specific
Ask advice
Steps in giving peer feedback (con’t)
Offer advice based on experience
Don’t change the original writing style
Don’t edit for your peer
Mention what works well AND what could be improved
Positive conflict
Conflict with positive outcomes, and all parties respectfully and professionally search for outcomes that are agreeable
Positive conflict example
You and a colleague are focused on discussing the issues and what tools to use, why, and how they might help the promotion of a product; you listen to each other actively and respectfully, and then you will likely reach a solution that works for both of you
Negative conflict
When the focus shifts away from finding a solution that works for everyone and towards causing harm
Negative conflict example
Instead of listening to your colleague as they explained their reasons for the tools they selected for a project, you stormed out of the meeting and refused to answer follow-up emails from your colleague
Why may conflicts arise?
When incompatible goals, scarce resources, or interference are present
Avoidance
A conflict management strategy where one chooses to change the subject, leave the room, or not even enter the room in the first place, but the conflict will remain/resurface when least expected
Allows for more time to resolve the problem, but can also increase costs associated with problem in the first place
Face-detracting and face-saving
Face-detracting are messages or statements that take away from the respect, integrity, or credibility of a person
Face-saving strategies protect credibility and separate message from messenger
Face-detracting and face-saving (con’t)
Face-detracting strategies often produce a defensive communication climate, inhibit listening, and allow for little room for collaboration. To save-face is to raise the issue while preserving a supportive climate, allowing room in the conversation for constructive discussions and problem solving.
Face-detracting and face-saving example
“sales were down this quarter,” without specifically noting who was responsible. Sales were simply down. If, however, you ask, “How does the sales manager explain the decline in sales?” you have specifically connected an individual with the negative news
Empathy
Listening to both the literal and implied meanings within a message. By paying attention to feelings and emotions associated with content and information, we can build relationships and address conflict more constructively.
Managing emotions
Recognizing when emotions are on edge in yourself or others, and choosing to wait to communicate, problem-solve, or negotiate until after the moment has passed.
Managing emotions (con’t)
Awareness of them can help you clear your mind and choose to wait until the moment has passed to solve the conflict
Learning from experience
Every communication interaction provides an opportunity for learning if you choose to see it. Sometimes the lessons are situational and may not apply in future contexts
Perks of organization
You’ll know what the audience will want to know, say, or hear, and prepare statements and visual aids to support your speech and create the timing, organization, and presentation of each point in order to respond effectively and make an impact
Treating public speaking like a conversation
The rules we play comfortably by in conversation every day are the same as we shift to a larger conversation within the context of public speaking
Verbal cues which make a successful presentation
Use pitch inflections to enhance delivery
Use an appropriate volume depending on the environment
Stress certain words in your speech to add emphasis
Practice saying each word distinctly
Account for the pace at which you speak, since it influences how well the audience can understand you
Minimize filler words like “um” and “uh”
Non-verbal cues which make a successful presentation
Minimize movements/gestures that may come off as distracting
Maintain good eye contact with the audience
Stay silent at times, as it can add emphasis and dramatic effect when speaking
Presentation techniques
Audience references – Highlight something common to the audience that will make them interested in the topic.
Current events – Refer to a current event in the news that demonstrates the relevance of your topic to the audience.
Question – Ask either a question that asks for a response from your audience, or a rhetorical question, which does not need a response but is designed to get them thinking about the topic.
Personal reference – Refer to a story about yourself that is relevant to the topic.
Storytelling – Include an anecdote, a narrative, or a story.
Contingency planning
Preparing for the worst-case scenario to minimize the negative effect(s)
Preparing to present
Practise and rehearse
Test all equipment
Try to access the room in which the presentation will be in to get a feel for it
Forming
Group members begin to reduce uncertainty associated with new relationships and/or new tasks through initial interactions that lay the foundation for later group dynamics.
Groups return to this stage as group members come and go over the life span of a group
Storming
Conflict emerges as people begin to perform their various roles, have their ideas heard, and negotiate where they fit in the group’s structure. The uncertainty present in the forming stage begins to give way as people begin to occupy specific roles and the purpose, rules, and norms of a group become clearer.
Norming
The practices and expectations of the group are solidified, which leads to more stability, productivity, and cohesion within the group. Group norms are behaviours that become routine but are not explicitly taught or stated.
Performing
During the performing stage of group development, group members work relatively smoothly toward the completion of a task or the achievement of a purpose; the relational aspects of group interaction provide an underlying support for the group members
Adjourning
The adjourning stage of group development occurs when a group dissolves because it has completed its purpose or goal or for reasons surrounding its members
How to make the most of adjourning
Have some guided and purposeful reflection
e.g. A party to celebrate, learning for the future from failed experiences
The listening process
The learned process of receiving, interpreting, recalling, evaluating, and responding to verbal and nonverbal messages; it has no defined start nor end
Receiving
Taking in information needed for listening through auditory, nonverbal and visual channels
e.g. Seeing a person’s face when we hear their voice allows us to take in nonverbal cues from facial expressions and eye contact
Interpreting
Deriving meaning from the information that was received
Recalling
An important part of the listening process because it is most often used to assess listening abilities and effectiveness
Evaluating
Evaluating the worth of a message by making a value judgment about whether we think the message or idea is good/bad, right/wrong, or desirable/undesirable
Responding
Sending verbal and nonverbal messages that indicate attentiveness and understanding or a lack thereof.
Back-channel cues
Verbal and nonverbal signals we send while someone is talking; is a form of positive feedback
e.g. verbal cues like “uh-huh,” “oh,” and “right,” and/or nonverbal cues like direct eye contact, head nods, and leaning forward.
Benefits of paraphrasing
Showing you understand what was communicated. When you paraphrase information, you rephrase the message into your own words
e.g. saying a paraphrased response: “What I heard you say was…” or “It seems like you’re saying…”
Benefits of paraphrasing (con’t)
It can be a means to ask clarifying questions to get more information. It is often a good idea to pair a paraphrase with a question to keep a conversation flowing.
e.g. Posing the following paraphrase and question pair: “It seems like you believe you were treated unfairly. Is that right?”
Active listening
The process of pairing outwardly visible positive listening behaviours with positive cognitive listening practices and can help address many of the environmental, physical, cognitive, and personal barriers to effective listening you may encounter.
How to be an active listener
Avoid important listening activities during times of distracting psychological or physiological noise
Work to maintain focus as much as possible and refocus when attention shifts or fades
Maintain eye contact
Listening in professional contexts
Managers are wise to enhance their empathetic listening skills, as being able to empathize with employees contributes to a positive communication climate
Active listening among organizational members also promotes involvement and increases motivation, which leads to more cohesion and enhances the communication climate.
A more direct way to indicate active listening
Reference previous statements made by the speaker by summarizing statements, asking questions, and inviting other people to speak
Listening with empathy
Intercultural communication
When people between subgroups of the same country communicate
e.g. Distinctions between dialects in the same language, the differences in perspective between an Eastern Canadian and a Western Canadian
Culture
The shared beliefs, values, and assumptions of a group of people who learn from one another; and teach others that their behaviours, attitudes, and perspectives are the correct ways to think, act, and feel
5 ways to think about culture
Culture is learned.
Culture is shared.
Culture is dynamic.
Culture is systemic.
Culture is symbolic.
Multiculturalism
A rather surface approach to the coexistence and tolerance of different cultures with a perspective of “us and the others”, and typically focuses on those tip-of-the-iceberg features of culture,highlighting and accepting some differences
Cross cultural
Goes a bit deeper, the goal being to be more diplomatic or sensitive
A draw back of cross cultural approaches
It can go into stereotyping and ethnocentric attitudes—judging other cultures by our own cultural standards—if we aren’t mindful
Intercultural approaches
Intentionally making efforts to better understand other cultures as well as ourselves; it’s a difficult and messy process
Hofstede’s dimensions
Places cultural dimensions on a continuum that range from high to low
Power distance
High power distance means a culture accepts and expects a great deal of hierarchy; low power distance means the president and janitor could be on the same level.
Individualism
High individualism means that a culture tends to put individual needs ahead of group or collective needs
Uncertainty avoidance
High uncertainty avoidance means a culture tends to go to some lengths to be able to predict and control the future. Low uncertainty avoidance means the culture is more relaxed about the future, which sometimes shows in being willing to take risks
Masuclinity
High masculinity relates to a society valuing traits that were traditionally considered masculine, such as competition, aggressiveness, and achievement. A low masculinity score demonstrates traits that were traditionally considered feminine, such as cooperation, caring, and quality of life
Long-term orientation
High long-term orientation means a culture tends to take a long-term, sometimes multi-generational view when making decisions about the present and the future. Low long-term orientation is often demonstrated in cultures that want quick results and that tend to spend instead of save
Indulgence
High indulgence means cultures that are okay with people indulging their desires and impulses. Low indulgence or restraint-based cultures value people who control or suppress desires and impulses
Trompenaars
Help us understand some of those beneath-the-surface-of-the-iceberg elements of culture
Universalism vs. particularism
The extent that a culture is more prone to apply rules and laws as a way of ensuring fairness, in contrast to a culture that looks at the specifics of context and looks at who is involved, to ensure fairness. The former puts the task first; the latter puts the relationship first
Individualism vs. communitarianism
The extent that people prioritize individual interests versus the community’s interest
Specific vs. diffuse
The extent that a culture prioritizes a head-down, task-focused approach to doing work, versus an inclusive, overlapping relationship between life and work
Neutral vs. emotional
The extent that a culture works to avoid showing emotion versus a culture that values a display or expression of emotion
Achievement vs. ascription
The degree to which a culture values earned achievement in what you do versus ascribed qualities related to who you are, based on elements like title, lineage, or position
Sequential time vs. synchronous time
The degree to which a culture prefers doing things one at time in an orderly fashion versus preferring a more flexible approach to time with the ability to do many things at once
Internal direction vs. outer direction
The degree to which members of a culture believe they have control over themselves and their environment, versus being more conscious of how they need to conform to the external environment
High context culture
A shared understanding is implied and highly contextual, and thus agreements are verbal
Low context culture
Highly detailed, written agreements that are signed by both parties, sometimes mediated through specialists like lawyers, as a way to enforce the agreement
Not much is left to the imagination or “context.”
What should be done when working with others?
Educate yourself on the culture, customs, etiquette, etc
The Intercultural Development Continuum
Denial
Polarization
Minimization
Acceptance
Adaptation
Denial
Denying that a problem is present. It’s a monocultural mindset where diversity is ignored
Polarization
When one accepts that cultural differences exist, but views it as a '“us vs. them” ordeal
Polarization (con’t)
Reinforces already-existing biases and stereotypes and misses out on nuanced understanding and empathy, makes diversity seem ‘uncomfortable’
Minimization
Recognizes that there are cultural differences, even significant ones, but tends to focus on universal commonalities that can mask or paper over other important cultural distinctions.
Diversity feels unheard
Acceptance
A recognition and deeper appreciation of both their own and others’ cultural differences and commonalities is the first dimension that exhibits a more intercultural mindset; people are better able to detect cultural patterns and are able to see how those patterns make sense in their own and other cultural contexts
Diversity feels understood
Adaptation
An ability not only to recognize different cultural patterns in oneself and other cultures but also to effectively adapt one’s mindset or behaviour to suit the cultural context authentically.
Diversity feels valued and involved.