Land Degradation, Soil Resources, and Global Land Use in Environmental Science

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/422

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:20 AM on 7/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

423 Terms

1
New cards

What is the central global problem that creates the need for land rehabilitation?

Human demand for food, materials and land is increasing while the total land area is fixed and a growing share of land and soil is degraded or otherwise unavailable.

2
New cards

Why is healthy soil a limited resource on human time scales?

Soil forms very slowly, while erosion and other degradation processes can remove or damage it far faster than natural replacement.

3
New cards

How can rehabilitation reduce pressure on undegraded land?

By restoring safe and useful functions on already degraded land, rehabilitation can reduce the need to convert additional natural or productive areas.

4
New cards

Name five broad human or ecological needs supported by land and soil.

Food and fibre production, water regulation, infrastructure, biodiversity and habitat, nutrient cycling, carbon storage, cultural values and raw materials. Any five are sufficient.

5
New cards

Why are protection and rehabilitation both necessary?

Protection prevents further loss of existing functions. Rehabilitation recovers functions that have already been damaged. Rehabilitation alone cannot keep pace if new degradation continues.

6
New cards

What does it mean to describe soil as a physical, chemical and biological system?

Soil function depends on structure and pores, chemical conditions and nutrient or contaminant behaviour, and living organisms and their processes. These components interact.

7
New cards

Why should soil not be treated only as a medium that holds plant roots?

Soil simultaneously regulates water, cycles nutrients, stores carbon, filters contaminants, supports organisms and infrastructure, and preserves cultural values. Plant support is only one function.

8
New cards

Why can a site appear stable while still being degraded?

Visible stability may hide chemical contamination, low biological activity, poor nutrient cycling, compaction, salinity or loss of ecosystem services.

9
New cards

Why must rehabilitation objectives be linked to future land use?

Different uses require different functions and levels of protection. A conservation area, residential site, sports field and agricultural field need different target conditions and receptors.

10
New cards

What is an ecosystem service in the context of soil?

A benefit people and ecosystems receive from soil processes, such as food production, water purification, flood regulation, habitat support or carbon storage.

11
New cards

What population level was the lecture trajectory expected to approach by 2050?

Approximately 10 billion people.

12
New cards

Why does population growth increase land pressure even if consumption per person stays constant?

More people require a greater total quantity of food and materials, so total production and land demand rise.

13
New cards

Why can rising consumption increase pressure independently of population growth?

A higher per-person demand for land-intensive food and goods increases the land footprint of each person.

14
New cards

What is a land footprint?

The area of land required to support a consumption pattern or supply chain, including land used outside the place where the goods are consumed.

15
New cards

Why can consumption and environmental impact be geographically separated?

Imported food and materials embody land use and degradation in the producing region, while the products are consumed elsewhere.

16
New cards

What equation is used to calculate land required per person?

Total land footprint divided by the number of people equals land area per person.

17
New cards

Using the lecture values, calculate the UK food-supply land footprint per person.

237,230,000,000 m2 divided by 55,200,000 people is approximately 4,298 m2 per person.

18
New cards

Using the lecture values, how many people could an area equal to Optus Stadium feed at the stated UK footprint?

16,847 m2 divided by 4,298 m2 per person is approximately 3.9 people.

19
New cards

Why do the units become m2 per person when calculating a per-person footprint?

The total area is measured in m2 and is divided by a number of people, leaving m2/person.

20
New cards

What common arithmetic error should be avoided when finding a per-person footprint?

Do not multiply total land by population. Divide total land by the number of people.

21
New cards

What unit conversion is needed to convert m2 to km2?

Divide the number of square metres by 1,000,000 because 1 km2 equals 1,000,000 m2.

22
New cards

What is the teaching purpose of the Optus Stadium comparison?

It makes the scale of the food land footprint intuitive. It is not a literal proposal to farm the stadium.

23
New cards

What major assumption should accompany the 4,298 m2/person figure?

It applies the UK-standard food footprint used in the lecture and assumes that footprint is an appropriate basis for the comparison.

24
New cards

Why should global land totals not be interpreted as equally productive hectares?

Land differs in climate, soil quality, water supply, location, slope, biodiversity value and accessibility.

25
New cards

What competing land uses were highlighted in the lecture?

Food production competes with biodiversity conservation, cities, mining, infrastructure, water supply, forestry and other uses.

26
New cards

Why can global averages conceal inequality?

Different communities have unequal consumption levels, land access, exposure to degradation and ability to shift impacts elsewhere.

27
New cards

What total ice-free land area was used in the lecture?

Approximately 130,000,000 km2.

28
New cards

How much land was described as used for agriculture, including cropland, meadows and pastures?

Approximately 50,000,000 km2.

29
New cards

What percentage of the illustrated land budget was labelled cropland and pasture?

42%.

30
New cards

What percentage was labelled natural forest?

28%.

31
New cards

What percentage was labelled unsuitable for agriculture?

19%.

32
New cards

What did the remaining 11% in the lecture diagram broadly represent?

Smaller human-use categories such as urban and rural areas, mining, plantation forest or logging and other land uses.

33
New cards

Scale the 4,298 m2/person footprint to 7.347 billion people. What area results?

About 31,577,406 km2 after converting from square metres.

34
New cards

Why does the people unit cancel when global population is multiplied by m2/person?

People multiplied by m2 per person leaves m2 because the person units cancel.

35
New cards

Why was the 31.6 million km2 estimate compared with about 30 million km2 of available agricultural land?

To communicate that a high-consumption global diet would place very large pressure on the remaining agricultural land base.

36
New cards

What does the global land comparison not prove?

It does not prove that everyone will eat a UK diet, that all land is equally productive, or that every unsuitable area can be converted safely to agriculture.

37
New cards

What dimensions other than total area constrain the global land budget?

Land quality, climate, water, spatial location, competing uses, ecological value and degradation condition.

38
New cards

Why can rehabilitation improve the land budget without creating new land?

It can increase the function, productivity or safe usability of existing degraded land.

39
New cards

Define land degradation.

A decline in land condition, function, productivity, ecological integrity or capacity to provide valued ecosystem services. It can involve soil, water, vegetation and biodiversity.

40
New cards

How is land degradation broader than soil degradation?

Land degradation can include soil, water, vegetation, habitat and landscape interactions. Soil degradation focuses on the soil component.

41
New cards

What is water erosion?

The detachment and transport of soil by raindrop impact, sheet flow, rills, gullies, concentrated runoff or stream-bank processes.

42
New cards

What is wind erosion?

The removal and transport of dry, loose and poorly protected soil particles by wind.

43
New cards

Why can wind erosion selectively reduce fertility?

Fine particles and organic or nutrient-rich material are often preferentially removed.

44
New cards

Distinguish on-site and off-site erosion impacts.

On-site impacts occur where soil is lost, such as shallower profiles and lower fertility. Off-site impacts occur where sediment is transported, such as turbidity, sedimentation and contaminant movement.

45
New cards

What surface features help protect soil against erosion?

Vegetation cover, roots, surface roughness and stable soil aggregates.

46
New cards

What conditions increase erosion risk?

Bare soil, steep slopes, intense rainfall, strong wind, unstable aggregates and concentrated flow.

47
New cards

What erosion rate was presented for eastern Australia on a depth basis?

Approximately 10 to 20 mm per 1,000 years.

48
New cards

What average soil formation rate was compared with eastern Australian erosion?

Less than 1 mm per 1,000 years.

49
New cards

What global agricultural erosion range was presented on a mass basis?

Approximately 1 to 500 tonnes per hectare per year.

50
New cards

What average soil formation range was presented on a mass basis?

Less than about 0.1 to 1 tonne per hectare per year.

51
New cards

How much faster than formation did the lecture state soil can be depleted?

Approximately 10 to 1,000 times faster.

52
New cards

Why can a small annual erosion rate still be unsustainable?

Natural soil formation is extremely slow, so repeated small losses can exceed replacement and accumulate over time.

53
New cards

What must be checked before comparing erosion and formation rates?

Ensure the rates use comparable units and time scales, such as depth with depth or mass with mass.

54
New cards

What should a tolerable soil-loss assessment consider beyond the annual number?

Soil depth, fertility, landscape position, off-site effects, formation rate and recovery capacity.

55
New cards

What is the core rehabilitation planning sequence introduced in the lecture?

Desired future use -> target properties -> baseline assessment -> gap analysis -> intervention.

56
New cards

What is the first core question before selecting an intervention?

What properties must the soil and site have to support the intended plants, ecosystem or land use?

57
New cards

What is the second core question before selecting an intervention?

What properties and conditions does the site currently exhibit?

58
New cards

What is the third core question before selecting an intervention?

What materials, processes, technologies and management options are available to close the gap between baseline and target?

59
New cards

What is a target condition?

The desired measurable condition linked to the intended future use or function.

60
New cards

What is a baseline condition?

The measured starting condition against which the target and future change are assessed.

61
New cards

What is a performance gap?

The difference between the target condition and the baseline condition.

62
New cards

Why should targets be use-specific?

Each future use has different functions, exposure scenarios and acceptable conditions.

63
New cards

Why should baseline assessment include spatial and vertical variability?

A single average can conceal hotspots, saline patches, compacted areas or acidic subsoil horizons.

64
New cards

What new risks can soil amendments create?

They may add contaminants or salts, release excessive nutrients, behave unstably or create long-term management problems.

65
New cards

Why is laboratory success insufficient evidence of field success?

Field systems include greater scale, variability, climate exposure, hydrology, logistics and long-term processes.

66
New cards

What elements make a strong completion criterion?

A measurable variable, accepted range, sampling method, spatial scale, timing and a clear connection to the intended function.

67
New cards

Why pair soil chemistry targets with ecological performance indicators?

Suitable chemistry does not guarantee that vegetation, diversity, survival or ecosystem processes have actually recovered.

68
New cards

Give an example of a use-specific target difference.

Residential land may require strict human exposure protection, while a conservation site may prioritise native diversity, habitat structure and ecological processes.

69
New cards

What does the formula target minus baseline represent?

The performance gap that management must close.

70
New cards

Describe the dryland salinity mechanism linked to clearing deep-rooted perennial vegetation.

Clearing reduces evapotranspiration, recharge increases, the water table rises and stored salts move toward the root zone and soil surface.

71
New cards

How can agriculture contribute to soil acidification?

Removal of alkaline products, nitrate leaching and some fertiliser reactions can create a net acid load.

72
New cards

What common amendment can neutralise soil acidity when properly selected and incorporated?

Lime or another suitable alkaline amendment.

73
New cards

What processes can reduce soil organic matter in agricultural land?

Cultivation, low biomass inputs, erosion and rapid decomposition.

74
New cards

What is required to rebuild soil organic matter?

Sustained organic carbon inputs and protection from erosion, excessive disturbance and rapid loss.

75
New cards

Explain a feedback loop connecting low cover, erosion and organic matter loss.

Low cover increases erosion. Erosion removes organic matter. Lower organic matter weakens aggregates, which further increases erosion and compaction risk.

76
New cards

Why can a small absolute carbon loss be important in WA soils?

WA soils are often already low in carbon, so a small absolute decline can represent a large proportion of the existing pool.

77
New cards

Why can surface-only pH sampling miss an important degradation problem?

Subsurface acidity can be severe even when the surface layer appears acceptable.

78
New cards

What share of Earth land area did the lecture cite as substantially degraded?

More than 75%.

79
New cards

What possible degraded-land share was cited for 2050?

Up to about 95%.

80
New cards

How many people were described as affected by land degradation worldwide?

Approximately 1.5 billion people, especially subsistence farmers.

81
New cards

What percentage of the global poor were described as directly affected by land degradation?

74%.

82
New cards

What annual economic loss from biodiversity and ecosystem-service decline was cited?

The equivalent of about 10% of global GDP, around US$8.58 trillion in the cited comparison.

83
New cards

How did the lecture compare the cost of inaction with the cost of action?

The cost of inaction was estimated at about three times the cost of action.

84
New cards

How did the lecture compare restoration benefits with restoration costs?

Benefits were estimated at about ten times the costs.

85
New cards

Why are subsistence farmers especially vulnerable to land degradation?

They depend directly on local land and water for food and income and often have fewer alternatives or resources to absorb losses.

86
New cards

How can land degradation reinforce poverty?

It can reduce yields and income, raise food costs, damage water quality, cause displacement and increase conflict over resources.

87
New cards

What distributional questions should a complete land assessment ask?

Who receives benefits, who bears risks and costs, and whose values and knowledge are represented in decisions?

88
New cards

Define land degradation neutrality.

Maintaining or increasing land resource quantity and quality within a defined area and time by avoiding and reducing new degradation and reversing past degradation.

89
New cards

What is the land degradation neutrality response hierarchy?

Avoid degradation first, reduce degradation that cannot be fully avoided, then reverse past degradation through restoration or rehabilitation.

90
New cards

Why does avoiding degradation receive priority over restoration?

Prevention is usually more reliable and less costly than rebuilding complex soil and ecosystem functions after they are lost.

91
New cards

Why are baselines and indicators essential for a neutrality claim?

Neutrality requires a reference condition and measurable evidence of losses, gains and changes over time.

92
New cards

What underlying drivers were highlighted in the IPBES extract?

Consumption, population growth, agricultural expansion, natural-resource and mineral extraction, and urbanisation.

93
New cards

Which Sustainable Development Goal target includes land degradation neutrality?

SDG target 15.3.

94
New cards

What is best available science?

The most credible, relevant and usable evidence available for a particular management decision at the time.

95
New cards

Why does best available science not mean perfect science?

Environmental decisions must often be made before uncertainty is eliminated. The evidence must be sufficient and transparent for the present decision.

96
New cards

What does it mean that science is self-correcting?

New data and analysis can reveal errors, reduce uncertainty and replace earlier explanations.

97
New cards

Why might a strong study still be poorly applicable to a management problem?

Its site, scale, climate, methods, receptors or decision context may differ from the actual case.

98
New cards

Why is delay itself a management decision?

Waiting can allow harm, costs or irreversible degradation to continue and can lock in future options.

99
New cards

What should a defensible decision make visible?

Evidence, assumptions, uncertainties, values, risks and the reasoning used to choose the action.

100
New cards

How can scientists and managers interpret uncertainty differently?

Scientists may use caution to avoid overclaiming. Managers may perceive the same caution as a lack of guidance.