1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
comparative stats
tests that compare characteristics of 2+ independent populations OR compare before/after characteristics of the same pop being followed over time
1st step + key analysis: case-control
1st step: cases+controls are similar EXCEPT disease status
Key Analysis: odd ratios → see if case/controls have diff exp. histories
1st step + key analysis: cohort
1st step: exposed+unexposed are similar EXCEPT for exposure status
Key Analysis: rate ratios → exp/unexp have diff rates of incident disease
1st step + key analysis: experimental
1st step: individuals on an intervention+control groups are similar EXCEPT exposure status
Key Analysis: tests of efficacy → intervention/control groups have diff outcomes
null hypothesis / H0
expected result of stat test - if there’s NO diff betw. 2+ values being compared
null result / Ha
no statistically significant difference
alternative hypothesis
expected results if there IS a diff betw. the 2+ pop being compared
reject the null hypothesis?
values ARE DIFFERENT
reject the idea that values have no difference
*thinking there is a difference when the null is true = type 1 error
fail to reject the null hypothesis?
NO evidence that values are different
*saying there is no difference when there IS difference = type 2 error
p-value
aka probability value - likelihod that a test statistic is as extreme/more extreme than the one observed would occur by chance if null was true
small p-value → observed test is likely to occur by chance = exposure is likely to cause a difference
type 1 error affects our result interpretation? how to reduce probability of type 1 error?
REJECTING A TRUE NULL! thinking there is a difference when there is not! false positive
increase sample size, lower alpha (stricter for errors)
significance level
p-value where null is rejected
statistical significance
p-value is less than significance level
standard significance lvl most commonly used in studies
0.05/5%
assumption, what do some stat tests assume?
assumed to be true
6 steps for hypothesis testing
1) select variables to compare
2) specify goal of test
3) check variable types
4) choose appropriate test for variables
5) confimr assumptions of tests are met
6) run test + interpret results
parametric test
variables being examined have particular distributions
nonparametric test
does NOT make assumptions ab distributions of responses
typical variables + distributions of variables in para vs. nonpara
para: used for ratio + interval variables w norm dist.
non-para: used for ranked variables + when dist. of ratio + interval is not normal
chi square test - test formula, sample null/alt. for a chi square - independence, proper reporting
compares proportion of responses to a nominal vari to a selected value
X2 test
tbh idk
purpose of t test
to find significant difference betw. 2 sets of data
one sample t test
compares mean value of a ratio/interval vari to a selected value
ex: average water consumption in LV → national av. is 3 liters
independent populations
pops w no individual is a member of more than 1 of the groups being compared
independent samples t test
aka 2 sample t test - compares mean values of ratio/interval variable in 2 independent pop
test used when stats are being evaluated:
R/I: mean
Ordinal: median
tests when stats in one pop is diff from a hypothetical value
one sample t test
test used when stat differs in 2 pops
independent t tests
test used when stat differs in 3+ pop
one way ANOVA
paired data
vari linked together for analysis- if theyre simialr
matched pairs t test
values of ratio/interval vari in members of 1 pop measured twice (before/after)
ANOVA
analysis of variance
compares mean values of a continuous variable across independent pops
one-way ANOVA
mean values of ONE ratio/interval predictors across independent groups of ppl
ex: mean age of pts at 3 diff family practices
uses F test
two - way ANOVA
aka factorial ANOVA - mean values of R/I vari across rgoups defined by 2 diff vari
e: mean ages by sex + smoking
repeated-measures ANOVA
compares values of R/I vari across several points i time/ several individ. matched pop