1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Interpersonal Communication
the production and processing of verbal and nonverbal messages between two or a few persons (Braithwaite & Schrodt)
linear model of communication
one-way view of communication that assumes a message is sent by a source to a receiver through a channel
Feedback
send and receive feedback simultaneously
Noise in Communication
Anything that blocks or distorts clear communication between the sender and receiver of a message.
Physical Noise
external noise that makes a message difficult to hear or otherwise receive (e.g., static on phone call or people talking loudly outside of a classroom)
Psychological Noise
the thoughts and feelings that distract people from listening to what is said (e.g., thinking/stressing about an upcoming exam)
Physiological Noise
biological interference (e.g., being hungry or sleepy)
Semantic Noise
distractions aroused by certain word choices that take our attention away from the main message (e.g., not knowing the meaning of a word the sender uses. Common with cultural differences or jargon.)
transactional model of communication
constant exchange of messages between sender and receiver
Conditions of Interpersonal Communication
intentionality, shared information/meaning, transmission, recognition of relationship (bond)
Three Axioms of Communication
1. One cannot not communicate (there is no such thing as "non-behavior")
2. Every communication has a content (direct) and a relationship (subtle) component. The relationship component classifies the content component and is therefore meta-communication.
3. Punctuation determines meaning (the way we say words changes the meaning)
Situational Approach to Interpersonal Communication
an approach that defines interpersonal communication based on the context and setting in which communication occurs
Developmental approach to interpersonal communication
defines interpersonal communication by the ability to predict a partner's behavior based on accumulated knowledge
Sources of Data for Prediction-Making
1. Cultural level data (knowing about their culture and daily routines)
2. Sociological level data (knowing their specific group memberships and roles in groups)
3. Psychological level data (harder to obtain, but the more you know, the better you can predict. Things that are unique to an individual like always being late, likes reading, rides bike, etc.)
Components of Language
1. Phonemes
2. Syntax
3. Semantics
4. Pragmatics
Phonemes
the sounds we make when pronouncing words
Syntax
how we arrange the words (may or may not change the meaning)
Semantics
meaning of words (can be different based on context)
Pragmatics
the purpose of the words (what do they do for us)
Digital Code of Language
1. Has arbitrary elements (no logical reasons, just agreed upon meanings by general population)
2. Rules exist for combining these elements (ex: grammar rules)
3. Potential transformation (change the order of syntax but meaning stays the same)
Analogic Code (language)
the word is "thing-like" (ex: the word "punch" sounds like a punch)
Cooperative Principle
Grice's framework proposing that people follow maxims to make communication effective and mutually beneficial
Maxim of Quantity
speakers should provide the appropriate amount of information, neither too much nor too little
Maxim of Quality
speakers should be truthful and avoid saying what they believe to be false or insufficiently supported
Maxim of Relation
speakers should make their contributions relevant to the topic being discussed
Maxim of Manner
speakers should be clear and avoid obscurity or ambiguity
Implicature
- drawing extra conclusions or meanings (confusing message)
- caused by violated maxims
Maxim of Politeness
speakers should be courteous and respectful when communicating with others
Maxim of Morality
speakers should not repeat confidential information and avoid asking for information that is not needed
Maxim of Charity
speakers should try to violate as few maxims as posisble
Problems with the Maxims
1. too broad
2. do not handle all aspects of language
3. cooperative conversation is culturally determined
Politeness Theory (Brown and Levinson)
strategies are developed in order to save the receiver's 'face'; we usually want to socially accept our audience, making them feel valued, avoiding their embarrassment
Assumptions of Politeness Theory
1. all people have face wants
2. it is in everybody's interests to cooperate in satisfying each other's face needs
3. people are rational, so they choose means that with satisfy their ends
Two Kinds of Face
positive and negative
Positive face
desire to be liked and admired by others
Negative face
desire to be autonomous and free from others
Face-threatening acts (FTAs)
criticism and requests which violates someone's face
What determines a face-threatening act?
1. social distance (closeness and similarity)
2. power or status of the listener relative to the speaker (if they have power it is found less threatening)
3. degree of imposition (when a request is larger it's found as more threatening)
4. rank (varies for different cultures)
Combined = weight (tells us how face threatening the request will be)
Politeness Strategies (most to least polite)
1. do not say anything at all (most polite)
2. off record strategy
3. negative face redress
4. positive face redress
5. bald on record strategy (least polite)
Off record strategy
imply request without actually saying it
Negative face redress
acknowledge a person's autonomy
Positive face redress
acknowledge a person's social acceptance (praise)
Bald on-record strategy
directly say your request
Equivocal communciation
being vague or ambiguous (often used to avoid conflict)
Meta-theoretical discourses
1. Post-positivist perspective
2. Interpretive perspective
3. Critical perspective
Post-positivist perspective
believes that there is a single objective world view; aims to advance predictions and offer generalizations; mainly uses surveys, experiments, and statistics for methodology
Interpretive Perspective
rejects the single objective view (each individual's POV is unique); mainly uses ethnography, focus groups, and in-depth interviews; privacy management theory: how people manage their privacy
Critical Perspective
identifies inequities; as a guide to uncover marginalized or silenced voices; may use similar methods to interpretive perspective
Requests from friends study
asked people what they found more or less polite when a friend was making a request. they found that people valued when their friend was explicit and rationale with their request, but found impolite if their friend exerted dominance.
Still learning (7)
You've started learning these terms. Keep it up!