1/42
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
name 6 operational objectives
1.reducing unit costs 2.increase quality 3.response speed+flexibility 4.dependability 5.environmental 6.create added value
avrg unit costs formula
total costs / units sold
reducing unit costs (CoA)
reduce selling price > more competitive > more sales > more rev, if PED is elastic
maintain selling price > improved profit margin per unit > more profit > use cost savings to improve business e.g increase wages / increase quality
improving quality (CoA)
increased customer satisfaction > if long term, higher reputation > more brand loyalty > reduced PED > can increase price to increase rev
less recalls > less waste > more efficient > reduced CPU
environmental (CoA)
satisfying stakeholder needs > less pressure groups > improved brand image > more loyalty > added value
efficiency
using resources in such a way as to maximize the production of goods and services
ways to achieve labour efficiency
more training > skilled workers > less defects/waste & increased motivation > higher labour productivity Or adopt new managerial style best fit for workers (e.g laissez faire)
ways to achieve capital efficiency
invest in machines/tech/automation > supports labour > decreases workload > labour productivity increased & more capital productivity
ways to achieve efficiency through enterprise
increase output > achieve EoS (purchasing, managerial, marketing, technical) > reduced CPU
drawbacks of labour efficiency
cost of training > offset gains? increased workload > lower motivation > lower retention/ask for higher wages > increased costs
drawbacks of capital efficiency
high investment costs > offset gains? > finance available? > resistance from shareholders as less short term gains?
link to kotter's resistance to change theory
drawbacks of efficiency through enterprise
does demand exist for output? waste is inefficient diseconomies of scale?
what is adding value
the improvement of a product or service which makes it worth more. This can be done through production(quality/usp), distribution(convenience) & marketing (brand image)
importance of adding value
stands out from rivals > competitive advantage > repeat business > more sales > increased market share
customers less price sensitive > PED inelastic > charge higher prices > more profit per unit > lower break even output > increased margin of safety > less risk
4 ways to use tech to improve efficiency
design (CAD/CAM)
stock management (computerised re-ordering)
capital for production (robotics/automation)
capital for fulfilment (amazons Kiva robots)
how can tech be used in design
CAD = computer aided design, CAM = computed aided manufacturing increases speed of process & easier to alter designs > improves flexibility > fulfil customers needs better > improved customer satisfaction
how can tech be used in stock management
computerised re-ordering > supports JIT > lean production > increased efficiency
how tech can be used in capital for production & fulfilment
capital intensive > less human labour needed > less wages & consistent quality > less waste & increased production scale > technical EOS > lower CPU > more efficient
negatives of using tech to improve efficiency
kotter & resistance to change > labour replaced > self interest, jobs at risk > demotivating finance available? > high investment > loss of short term gains > lower dividends > shareholders not satisfied
JIT - just in time
holding little/no stock so it arrives just as needed
Pros of JIT
less storage costs > lower labour & overheads
less risk to stock > easier to quality check > less risk of stock becoming obsolete
greater productivity > pull method creates time pressure > increased responsibility (e.g quality control) > more motivation
Cons of JIT
higher arg cpu > smaller purchases > no purchasing EOS & more deliveries > more pressure on logistics team > more skilled workers > higher wage costs
reliant on suppliers > failure to deliver/poor quality > no production > no sales > failure to meet demand > rep issues
JIT depends upon?
suppliers - proximity & relationship?, predictability of sales?, type of inventory?
JIC - just in case
the buffer, minimum stock a business holds
pros of jic
manages uncertainty e.g suppliers fail to deliver/ unexpected demand > can continue production > sales > maintain rep
bigger order size & less frequent > more important to suppliers > negotiate better deal w suppliers> purchasing EOS > lower cpu
cons of jic
always holding stock > higher storage costs > lower cash flow as stock not being turned into cash
waste > if goes off/ demand drops/ damage > opportunity cost
key points on stock level chart
capacity
max amount a business can produce, deliver, handle
pros of increasing capacity
can meet consumer demand > avoids lost sales & rivals benefiting & damage to rep
able to fulfil high order volumes > maximise revenues > help business grow > competitive advantage
cons of increasing capacity
lead to higher costs e.g factory, staff, equipment > need rev to cover costs >. shareholders dissatisfied > lower profits > less dividends how are extra costs financed? loans > impact on gearing > more susceptible to external changes in interest rates
evaluation for increasing capacity
consider cap u > must match demand e.g 10% rise in cap but 5% rise in sales leads to lower cap u > less efficient > higher cpu - but increased flexibility of business
is the capacity flexible? e.g use zero hours contracts to change cap to meet demand > more efficient
capacity utilisation
Actual output / maximum output x 100
impact of increasing capacity utilisation
increased efficiency as more resources being used > less waste > lower cpu (esp important if fixed costs high)
links to other functional areas: e.g marketing impacts on brand image if prices can be lowered / HR & staff motivation if worker feel overworked
more staff responsibility > feel greater sense of loyalty to business> improved motivation
impact of spare capacity
aids operational flexibility to cope w changes in demand (fashions, seasonal, growing markets)
improved quality > production not rushed > spare space & time to upkeep factors of production> e.g improvements/repairs to capital & labour training
less staff workload > improved motivation > better retention & less absenteeism
what is rationalisation
A process by which a firm improves its efficiency by cutting the scale of its operations
ways to rationalise
redundancies
reduce production size > sell nc assets e.g machinery / factory leads to reduced capacity > increased cap u
Ways to increase capacity
operate for longer hours e.g 24/7 production, more capital, increase staff levels, outsource to other businesses
capital intensive
using more capital than labor in the production process
pros of capital intensive production
fully automated > 24/7 production(no breaks & sick days) > more capacity utilisation
less human error > more consistent production > improved quality
cost effective in long term (less wages to pay)> improved efficiency > technical Eos > lower cpu
cons of capital intensive production
initial cost of capital > how to finance > cash flow issues > less dividend for shareholders
inflexible machinery > can't change to match demand
become capital intensive if...
increasing finance available
produces in country w high wages
cost of capital is reducing
its a standardised product
Labour intensive production
Production methods that make more use of labour relative to machinery
pros of labour intensive
labour can complete tasks that capital can't
they can support process of kaizen & TQM by giving feedback & ideas
high levels customisation & flexibility