1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Acquiescence bias
Tendency for respondents to agree with statements or questions presented to them, regardless of beliefs.
Lack of disclosure
Potential consequence of participants' unwillingness or discomfort in sharing personal or sensitive information with the interviewer.
Social desirability
Tendency to respond or behave in a way that they think will make them liked or accepted.
Conformity bias
Presence of other participants may result in group dynamics and data may not represent the individual participants' beliefs.
Audience effect
Changing one's behaviour due to believing they are being observed.
Sampling Biases
Occurs when the sample is not representative of the target population.
Sampling method
Types include convenience, snowball, volunteer, purposive.
Gender bias
Differential treatment or representation of individuals based on their gender.
Cultural bias
Not representative of various cultural groups, participants are predominately or exclusively from one cultural background.
Methodological bias
Method used doesn't accurately measure the dependent variable.
Interpretation bias
Researchers' expectations, beliefs or cultural perspectives unduly influence the interpretation of study findings.
Confirmation bias
Tendency of researchers to favor information or interpretations that confirm their existing beliefs or hypotheses.
Personal reflexivity
Thinking on ways the researchers' own beliefs and opinions influence the researcher and how the research has affected the researcher personally and professionally.
Epistemological reflexivity
Thinking about the ways knowledge has been generated in the study.
Single blind procedure
Participants don't know condition they're receiving.
Double blind procedure
Both participants and experimenter don't know which group is which.
Random allocation
Sample has equal chance of going into any condition.
Standardised procedures
Standardised instructions and testing conditions help with methodological biases and experimenter ones.
Peer review
Undergone evaluation by others working in the same field.