PHILO - Fallacies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 8 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/30

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

31 Terms

1
New cards
Against the Person (AD HOMINEM)
when someone refutes an argument by attacking person making the argument
2
New cards
Strawman Argument
someone who attacks a position the opponent doesn't really hold
3
New cards
Appeal to Ignorance (ARGUMENTUM IGNORANTIAM)
assers that a proposition is ture because it has not yet been proven to be false
4
New cards
FALSE DILEMMA/FALSE DICHOTOMY
limiting the options to two when there are in fact more options to choose from
5
New cards
Slippery Slope
suggests unlikely outcomes when there's justs not enough evidence to think so
6
New cards
Argument in a Circle
repeating what they already assumed beforehand, and not arriving at any new conclusion
7
New cards
Hasty Generalization
drawing a conclusion based on a small sample size
8
New cards
Red Herring
a distraction from the argument typically with some sentiment that seems to be relevant but isn't really on-topic
9
New cards
You're another (TU QUOQUE)
refusing an argument by showing that the speaker himself is guilty of it
10
New cards
Casual/False Fallacy
any logical breakdown when identifying a cause
11
New cards
Fallacy of Sunk Costs
We are susceptible to this errant behaviour when we crave that sense of completion or accomplishment
12
New cards
Appeal to Authority (ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM)
this happens when we misuse an authority
13
New cards
Equivocation
one meaning in one premise and another meaning in another premise
14
New cards
Appeal to Pity/Emotion (ARGUMENTUM AD MISERICORDIAM)
appeals to the compassion and emotional sensitivity of others when these factors are not strictly relevant to the argument
15
New cards
Bandwagon (ARGUMENTUM AD POPULUM)
the fallacy of attempting to win popular assent to a conclusion by arousing the feeling and enthusiasm of the multitude
16
New cards
Appeal to Force (ARGUMENTUM AD BACULUM)
when force, coercion, or even a threat, is used in place of a reason in an attempt to justify a conclusion
17
New cards
Inference
is a process whereby from the truth-value of the one or more propsoitions, we conclue to the truth-value of another propositon
18
New cards
Immediate Inferences
a type of inference that proceeds from one prosoition directly to another proposition
19
New cards
Mediate Inference
a type of inference that proceeds from two or more propositions to another which is implied in the given propositions
20
New cards
Material Element or the Matter of Inference
refers to the terms and propositions that are used
21
New cards
Formal Element or Form of the Inference
refers to the order of specific arrangement of the terms and propositions in the reference
22
New cards
Premises
inferences from which the conclusion is derived
23
New cards
Conclusion
the new truth that is attained which necessarily follows from the premises
24
New cards
Argumentative Discourse
a discourse which proves something (conclusion) on the basis of certain facts or propositions (premises)
25
New cards
Material Correctness
refers to the truth of the proposition
26
New cards
Formal Correctness
refers to the logical connection among the propositions such that one proposition (the conclusion) follows necessarily from the other propositions (premises)
27
New cards
Deductive Argument
proceeds from a more universal truth to a less universal truth
28
New cards
Inductive Argument
proceeds from a sufficient number of particular truths to auniversal truth
29
New cards
Categorical Syllogism
an argument which proceeds from statements concerning the relationship of two terms to a third term, to a conclusion
30
New cards
Moods
the different arrangements of each figure or the specific combination of the proposition that make up a syllogism
31
New cards
Fallacy
is an error in inferences that renders ana rgument invalid