3: Relict Leopard Frog - Status Part 3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:26 PM on 7/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

35 Terms

1
New cards

What stochastic event occurred in Black Canyon, October 2006?

storm that caused debris flow

2
New cards
<p>In 2017, what was the high-count of frogs?</p>

In 2017, what was the high-count of frogs?

1163

3
New cards
<p>Monitoring - Relative Abundance: Visual Counter Survey Data (VES)</p>

Monitoring - Relative Abundance: Visual Counter Survey Data (VES)

surveying the sight and taking the highest count

  • minimum estimation of the total population of frogs

4
New cards

Estimate of' ‘True’ Abundance: Mark-Recapture

Catch, mark, and release a sample of animals

Then sample again, keeping track of those that are marked and unmarked (new captures)

5
New cards

The true abundace of the population can be estimated as…

X (total in population) / M (marked) = C (total captured in second sample) / R (recaptures)

6
New cards

Lincoln-Peterson Estimator

simplest of such estimates to estimate population size

7
New cards

What is the Double Sampling Method?

Conduct Mark-recapture and VES at the same site

8
New cards

The Double Sampling Method first calibrates relative abundance from…

VES to estimates of true abundance from Mark-recapture

9
New cards

Calibrating the relative abundance from VES to estimates of true abundance from Mark-recapture provides a ratio that you can then apply to:

VES data from other sites where there is no estimate of true abundanceE

10
New cards

Essentially, what does the Double Sampling Method provide?

a ratio or correction factor to adjust VES data

11
New cards
<p>Change in total population over time:</p>

Change in total population over time:

Total population estimates

  • Estimates for the entire species (post-metamorphs)

12
New cards
<p>What do the total population estimates indicate?</p>

What do the total population estimates indicate?

Estimates of total populations increased over time from 2001 to 2017

13
New cards

Status of Translocation Site:

Grapevine Spring, AZ

Has rocky pools favored by frogs

14
New cards

Translocation Site:

Quail Spring, Spring 2008, after rehab effort → After cattle and burros abandoned the site in July 2010

no more open water, and no disturbances that hammered the vegetation

15
New cards

What are the translocation success criteria?

  1. Over-wintering

  2. Breeding Activity

  3. Natural Recruitment

  4. ‘Sustainable’ population

16
New cards

What is Over-wintering?

Do tadpoles/juveniles born in spring survive to next spring/survive winter

17
New cards

What is breeding activity?

Egg masses, tadpoles (born at sites)

18
New cards

What is Natural Recruitment?

Animals are born at the sight from animals that are at the sight

  • Has to be documented

  • often determined years after final release

19
New cards

What is ‘Sustainable’ population?

Is the population stable over-time?

20
New cards

Habitat management:

Mechanical vegetation reduction at Blue Point Spring

  • maintain open habitat by reducing grass

21
New cards

Maintaining important breeding pools (habitat)

Most ‘volunteer’ crew maintaining important breeding pool in a drainage ditch along an access road in Hoover Dam

  • frogs favor backwater habitat

22
New cards

In 2011, USFW Multidistrict Litigation:

USFWS legal agreement with WildEarth and Center for Biological Diversity to conduct actions under ESA for 251 candidate species including R. onca

23
New cards

What was the USFWS legal agreement with WildEarth and Center for Biological Diversity?

to conduct actions under ESA for 251 candidate species including R. onca

24
New cards

In 2016, Special Status Assessment (SSA) to inform listing decision on…

Updated:

  • Current distribution

  • Status of populations

  • Current threats

  • Mitigation needs (plans in terms of mitigation)

25
New cards

In 2016, just prior to the USFW decision, what was signed?

A revision and renewal of CAS

26
New cards

Current Stressors/’Threats’ Identified in 2016 SSA, revised CAS:

  1. Present or threatened destruction or curtailment of habitat or range

  2. Overutilization

  3. Disease or predation

  4. Inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms

  5. Other natural or manmade factors affecting continued existence

  6. Estimation of True Abundance

27
New cards

Why was overutilization negated as a ‘threat’/stressor?

There was no overutilization because all populations are on federal lands, illegal to use such frogs

28
New cards

Why was Inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms negated as a ‘threat’/stressor?

There were plenty of mechanisms to maintain populations

29
New cards

What did present or threatened destruction or curtailment of habitat or range involve?

  1. Habitat degradation

  2. Groundwater diversion and withdrawal

  3. Overgrowth of emergent vegetation

  4. Nonnative plants (invasive)

  5. Burro and cattle grazing (but also a benefit)

  6. Reduced connectivity of populations (but also a benefit)

30
New cards

Habitat degradation in Lake Mead:

drying out, underground water pressure decreasing, which led to no water rising up

31
New cards

How was burro and cattle grazing detrimental but also a benefit?

may hammer frogs, but also hammer vegetation, resulting in habitats that frogs favor

32
New cards

What did disease or predation involve?

  • Nonnative crayfish, bullfrogs, fishes

  • Amphibian chytrid pathogen

  • Chytrid pathogen present within historical range and in one population in R. onca

  • Negative impact on R. onca survivorship

33
New cards

What did other natural or manmade factors affecting continued existence involve?

  • Small population size

  • Flash, flood, events

  • Drought and Wildfire

34
New cards

Evaluation of “stressor” severity (High, Medium, Low), conducted by USFWS

35
New cards

USFWS Listing Decision, 2016