1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Limitation of Milgram (1963) situational variables
Many Ps worked out it was fake
Limitation of Milgram (1963) situational variables - Many Ps worked out it was fake
P: Many Ps worked out it was fake
E: Esp. when experimenter replaced by a member of the public
C: Unclear wether results due to obeisance or demand characteristics
2 strengths of Milgram (1963) situational variables
Other studies demonstrate effect of situational variables
Milgram has been replicated in other cultures
Strength of Milgram (1963) situational variables - Other studies demonstrate are effect of situational variables
P: Other studies demonstrate effect of situational variables
E: Field experiment in NY done by Bickman (1974) had people dress in 3 diff uniforms + get passer-by's to do task. 2x more likely to listen to guard uniform
C: Supports Milgram's conclusion that uniform conveys authority and leads to obedience
What type of experiment was Bickman (1974)?
Field experiment
When did Bickman do his field experiment in NY?
1974
What was Bickman (1974)?
Feild experiment in NY
Confederates wore 3 diff uniforms and asked passer-by's to do tasks
2x more likely to listen to guard uniform
Strength of Milgram (1963) situational variables - Milgram has been replicated in other cultures
P: Milgram has been replicated in other cultures
E: Miranda (1981) found obedience rate of over 90% in Spanish students. However most replications done in Western cultures
C: Obedience not exclusive to American males but further research needed for complete universality
What did Miranda (1981) do?
Did Milgram's experiment in Spain
Found obedience rate of over 90%
What obedience rate did Miranda (1981) find when she replicated Milgram in Spain?
Over 90%