1/90
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
drivers of ecosystem deterioration
change in use of land and sea resources, direct exploitation and harvesting of wild populations, climate change, pollution, invasive/alien species
indirect drivers of ecosystem deterioration
demographic and cultural, economic and technological, institutions and governance, conflicts and epidemics (values behaviors)
1st root cause of biodiversity crisis
human population size
grown by more than 20 billion people in the past 20 years
us below replacement rate for population maintenance (comes from immigration)
2nd root cause of biodiversity crisis
per capita resource consumption
india has highest pop. but low per capita energy use
india and Russia use same amt of energy, but Russia has less people
russia has higher per capita energy use
largely dictated by society wide indirect drivers
overexploitation and over hunting of other species at higher rates than they can maintain
1st documented human caused extinction
dodo bird - hunted by dutch sailors and invasive rats/pigs
size differential defaunation
threat of extinction higher for animals with larger body size
loss of large animals has consequences for ecosystems
impacts ecological interactions, ecosystem services, disease prevalence, population size
Interdisciplinary but science based
conservation biology is both, includes basic sciences and resource management but also normative discipline (specific values)
conservation biology values
biological diversity has intrinsic value
untimely extinction of populations and species should be prevented
diversity of species and the complexity of ecological communities should be preserved
science plays a critical role in our understanding of ecosystems
collaboration among scientists, managers, policymakers, and the public is important and often necessary
conservation biology goals
document full range of biological diversity on earth
investigate the human impact on species, genetic variation, and ecosystems
develop practical approaches to prevent the extinction of species, maintain genetic diversity within species, and protect and restore biological communities and their associated ecosystem functions
what is biological diversity?
genetic diversity: genetic variation within species (within individuals, and among/within geographically separated populations)
species diversity: all species on Earth from the entire phylogenetic tree of life
ecosystem diversity: all ecosystems (ecological communities and associated abiotic environments) on Earth, including land/oceans/freshwaters
biodiversity
variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine, and other aquatic ecosystems and ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems
morphological species
group of individuals that is distinct in outward appearance according to taxonomists
biological species
group of individuals that can potentially interbreed in the wild and do not breed with individuals of other groups
requires thorough study of breeding patterns
doesn’t apply to all organisms (e.g. microbes)
some plants can breed with other species, hybridize - this definition doesn’t work that well here
evolutionary species (lineage species concept)
groups of individuals that share unique similarities in their DNA (and evolutionary history)
made easier with molecular analysis tools, can compare DNA with modern tech
useful in identifying cryptic species - species that taxonomists would classify as a single species, but different species when looking at their DNA
Taxonomy
naming and classification of species
three domains of life
bacteria (pryokarya)
archaea
eucarya: all organisms with a membrane-bound nucleus in their cells (animals, plants, fungi, protists)
Eucarya (bottom to top level)
species - genus - family - order - class - phylum - kingdom
methods of measuring species diversity in the wild
transect method used for sedentary species (eg trees)
trapping methods used for small, mobile organisms (eg insects, other invertebrates)
aerial surveys (used for large wildlife)
electroshocking (like Barry Chernoff used to sample fish in streams)
Alpha diversity
species richness of organisms in a local community, the number of species found in a local community, such as a lake or meadow
gamma diversity
number of species at a larger geographic scale (region!) that includes multiple local community types (eg mountain range containing forest, meadow, and lake communities)
beta diversity
the rate of change of species composition (turnover) as one moves across a region, more turnover = greater beta diversity (also habitat diversity)
beta diversity = gamma diversity/mean alpha diversity
Endemism
a species occurs in one geographic areas and nowhere else
is associated with insular environments, such as oceanic islands
Species diversity index
accounts for the abundance of each species, rather than merely their presence or absence
Shannon diversity index (H)
negative sum of the proportional abundance of each species (i) in the local community (p) multiplied by the natural log of
ecosystem
an ecological community of species that interact (eg food web) in the context of abiotic conditions
can be great ecosystem diversity even within the same geographic area
beta diversity also describes ecosystem diversity
important to consider human role in ecosystems & diversity - current conservation biology views people as part of the ecosystem diversity to be conserved
humans become a part of ecosystem feedback systems (eg duck/rice/pond example)
keystone species
high impact, low proportional biomass
dominant (foundation) species
high impact due to high proportional biomass
rare species
low impact and low proportional biomass (often have high extinction risk)
common species
low impact despite high proportional biomass
ecosystem engineers
species that modify the physical environment with large ecological impact - a special case of keystone species (eg beavers, humans)
ecosystem stability
properties of the ecosystem (eg species diversity and composition, productivity, carbon sequestration) change little over time, fairly constant
ecosystem resistance
ability to remain the same state even with ongoing disturbance (eg river ecosystem that retains major ecosystem properties after fertilizer runoff enters it)
ecosystem resilience
ability to return to an original state quickly after disturbance (eg fertilizer runoff changes the abundance and diversity of plants and animals in river ecosystem, but the pre-fertilizer ecosystem properties recover quickly)
economics
study of the transfer of the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. Offers a monetary value system that’s clear and meaningful to everyone
externalities
not all costs are absorbed during the transaction (eg environmental costs like pollution are typically externalities in conventional economics; the costs are borne by biodiversity, ecosystems, the people outside of the transaction
tragedy of the commons
unregulated exploitation of a resource leads to overexploitation, resulting in the resource being lost to all of society
sometimes market value of a species does not favor its conservation (eg trophy hunting - the rarer the trophy to kill, the more people are willing to pay for it)
environmental economics
values components of the environment in analyzing effects of environmental phenomena (eg global warming) on conventional economic systems (eg insurance costs, agricultural production, etc)
extends traditional economic thinking to aspects of the environment
however it struggles in that it still is not really accounting for the non-monetary value of other parts of the environment, which is where ecological economics comes into play
ecological economics
much more academic than practiced in economic system
integrates ecology and economics with the goal of sustainability for humans and biodiversity/ecosystems
revolutionary in introducing new valuation systems to public policy
instrumental
the value that is a means to an end, has some utility
use-value vs non-use value
benefits are gained by those assigning value (use) or not (non-use)
something you’re getting a practical benefit from
a value that is recognized for what it is giving you
direct use
benefits are gained via consumption or production (marketable commodities, such as food, medicine, fiber, lumber)
indirect use
benefits gained not by harvesting or destroying the resource (ie recreation, education, research, scenic amenities, ecosystem services)
option value
prospect of future uses to new people (new medicines, future food, future genetic resources)
non-use existence value
how much people are willing to pay to protect a species just so they can know it exists
intrinsic value
assigning value as an end in itself
humans don’t have to be around to assign value, they have inherit value for themselves
ecotourism
ideally, economic benefits of tourism increase conservation value within conventional economies (local and global)
people will want to protect tigers in their community because they attract tourists and bring in money
ecosystem services: provisioning
material or energy outputs of an ecosystem (food, medicine, raw materials - direct use value provided by an ecosystem)
ecosystem services: regulating
maintenance of a habitable environment by an ecosystem (air, water purification, nutrient cycling, climate regulation, pollination, pest control - indirect use value provided by an ecosystem)
ecosystem services: cultural
how an ecosystem provides intellectual, spiritual, aesthetic value (art, design, science, religion - indirect and non-use value provided by an ecosystem)
pollinator biodiversity
bees and other native pollinators are responsible for fruit and seed production, a service that would be practically impossible to replicate
positive relationship between wild bee visitation rates and fruiting rates for flowers
example of a regulating ecosystem service, and an indirect use value
also a direct use value as a provisioning ecosystem service when crops are involved
wetland ecosystem services
sequestration of atmospheric carbon, food productivity, barrier to floodwater, plants take up toxins and excess nutrients
burden of proof
placed on conservationists (have to prove that this shouldn’t be done for reasons x, y, z) while intrinsic value system places burden of proof on developer (have to prove how much it is worth in economic benefits to destroy an ecosystem, endanger its species, etc)
US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requires environmental assessments or environmental impact for federal actions regarding the environment, requires reconciling instrumental and intrinsic values
US endangered species act
rare in public policy bc it assumes intrinsic value of species
environmental impact assessments
estimating environmental consequences of a development project
risks are determined by federal, state, and local laws that grant protection to species/environmental factors (clean water, anti-pollution, etc)
cost-benefit analysis
economic benefits of projects are usually weighed against estimated environmental costs in approval of development projects at local and regional levels of government
precautionary principle
choosing not to go forward with a development project when experts estimate there are significant risks to the environment (better safe than sorry)
erring on the side of caution
more in the EU than the US
relational value system
more meaningful to individuals than either instrumental or intrinsic value systems
better captures value of cultural ecosystem services
easier for individuals to relate to
intrinsic vs instrumental vs relational
intrinsic: moral, ethical, religious
instrumental: direct use, indirect use, option value, non-use
relational: personal and cultural identity, social responsibility, historical and education, biophilia, aesthetic
has more to do with the human experience/the existence of humans and our social systems than intrinsic value
anthropocentrism
moral consideration applies to human beings only
biocentrism
moral consideration applies to human and non-human beings (eg animals)
ecocentrism
moral consideration applies to biodiversity, ecosystems, and everything that inhabits them
globally extinct
no member of the species is found alive anywhere (ie dodo bird)
extinct in the wild
live individuals of species are only in captivity or human-controlled situations (ie California condor during late 1980s)
locally extinct
extinction of one or more local populations, but other populations exist elsewhere
functionally extinct
populations reduced to such low abundance that their role in ecosystems is negligible (ie Chinese river dolphin)
island habitat (risk factor for global extinction)
many endemic species, few populations, small population size, evolved in ecosystems with limited threats from predators, pathogens, and competitors
hunting or harvesting by people (risk factor for global extinction)
human efficiency and population density places intense harvesting pressure on populations
large body size (risk factors for global extinction)
body size trades off with population size and reproductive rate, such that reduced populations of large bodied species cannot easily recover
Boyer paper
extinctions were not random with respect to body size
Regression trees show major predictors of extinction risk (e.g. we can see on the phylogenies that most ground nesting species went extinct)
pre-historic extinction bias towards ground-nesting and large-bodied bird species + wave of extinction coinciding with Polynesian colonization is evidence of extinction due to hunting, invasive rats and pigs, and possibly habitat loss
7 forms of rarity (function of population size, geographic range, and habitat specificity)
only common/not rare species has a large geographic range, large population size in some place, and a broad habitat specificity
additional risk factors for extinction
large home range: habitat loss especially detrimental (ie jaguar)
slow reproduction: population cannot easily recover
limited dispersal ability: climate change and habitat loss
seasonal migration: habitat loss in multiple places
low tolerance for disturbance: most typical
permanent or temp aggregations: threats can affect a large fraction of the population
no prior contact with people: less tolerance for human disruption
close relatives that are recently extinct of threatened with extinction
environmental stochasticity (special problems of small populations)
change in average birth or death rates from year to year because of random changes in environmental conditions that affect population size as a whole (in theory all individuals in a population have an equal probability of being affected by environmental stochasticity)
Example: a severe winter in 2009-2010 brought wild horse population dangerously close to extinction
demographic stochasticity (special problems of small populations)
variation in individual reproduction and mortality rates due to chance events that alter demographic composition of the population (eg sex ratio of males to females - reproductive rates might be limited to low number of females)
Example: Spanish imperial eagle population sex ratio biased when population was small. In this species, mature individuals breed in large populations, resulting in more equal sex ratio. But in small populations, mature individuals leave, immatures breed and this produces mostly male offspring.
genetic stochasticity (special problems of small populations)
chance events influence which alleles are passed on to the next generation (genetic drift)
in small populations the chance of losing alleles due to drift is much higher than the chance of gaining alleles due to mutation or gene flow
genetic drift: the random change in allele frequencies from one generation to the next due to chance
Example: in fruit flies, larger populations kept greater genetic (nucleotide) diversity than smaller populations
effective population size (N2)
number of breeding individuals in the population
Allee effect
population growth that is positively density-dependent because survival or reproduction depend on living in a group
Example: Antarctic fur seals had higher pup survival rates when populations were larger, despite increased competition for food.
extinction vortex concept
reduction in population size can dramatically increase local extinction risk
ecological footprint
number of global hectares needed to support an average citizen
varies among nations
positively correlated with Human Development Index, a commonly used measure of standard of living
global distribution of CO2 emissions varies widely by country
Cardinale reading: biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
grassland prairies, experimental grassland plots at cedar creek, MN - lots of experiments done on impacts of/on biodiversity since the 1990s, article reviews the research
Biodiversity loss reduces the efficiency of ecosystem function in a nonlinear way
From textbook example: more diverse plots (with more species richness) grew more than less diverse plots (total number of plants is constant across plots)
ecosystem function
resource capture, biomass production, decomposition, nutrient recycling
biological diversity
variation in genes, species, functional traits
identity effects
ecosystem response is driven by a few functionally dominant species
curve decelerates quicker between original species richness and plant biomass, ecosystem function is “maxed out” sooner
diversity effects
complementarity among species with different functional traits (eg resource partitioning, positive interactions) drives ecosystem response
steeper curve between species richness and plant cover (more diversity of species continues to drive increases in plant cover for longer, until ecological redundancy is reached - ecosystem “maxes out” after a greater number of species in the ecosystem)
portfolio effect
diversity increases ecosystem stability
greater ecosystem stability (reduced variation in function) with increased species richness
contributing factors to emergence of infectious disease
land use changes, agricultural intensification, food industry changes, bushmeat trade
biodiversity effect on incidence of disease
biodiversity increasing incidence of disease:
higher diversity of species could host higher diversity of diseases
more possible sources of disease and places for transmission to occur
animal diversity is greater in the tropics - lots of diseases come from the tropics (larger scale phenomenon)
biodiversity decreasing incidence of disease:
at smaller scales: dilution effect
complementarity among plant species
might partly indicate complementarity among soil pathogens, which control plant biomass in a species-specific and density-dependent manner
identity effects
host identity determines “host competence” or “dilution potential"
some species make better hosts of disease than others, and the aggregate effect of host competence traits among species (community competence) determines disease transmission or dynamics (epidemiology)
host dilution potential
identity effects drive the relationship between host diversity and disease prevalence