1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
damages- remoteness test
decides if C is entitled to damages
factual causation
‘but for’ Ds actions, would C have suffered loss
Barnett
legal causation
Reasonably foreseeable or too remote from breach?
Wagon Mound
D need not predict the precise way in which the injury/damage was caused
so long as injury/damage of the same kind was foreseeable
Hughes V Lord Advocate
remedies- aim of damages
the aim is to put C in the position they would have been if the tort had not been committed
special damages
these are damages that have a specific value and are claimed up to the date of trial
D must mitigate Cs losses
general damages
these are damages that cannot be precisely calculated and are up to the judge to decide
injunctions
an equitable remedy so is at the discretion of the court
prohibitory injunctions
Prevents the D from committing a tort or from continuing with it
Miller V Jackson
mandatory injunction
an order to compel the D to act in a particular way