Factors affecting eyewitness testimony: Misleading Information

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 13

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Psychology

14 Terms

1

What is misleading information in eyewitness testimony?

Incorrect information given to an eyewitness after an event, often through leading questions or post-even discussion

New cards
2

What was the procedure of Loftus and Palmer’s Experiment 1?

45 participants watched films of car accidents and answered questions, including a critical leading question about speed using different verbs (e.g., smashed, hit, contacted)

New cards
3

How did the verb in the leading question affect speed estimates

Stronger verbs led to higher speed estimates

New cards
4

What was the procedure of Experiment 2

Participants watched a 1 minute video, answered speed related questions, and returned a week alter for further questioning including ‘Did you see any broken glass?’ (There was no broken glass).

New cards
5

What did Experiment 2 show about the effects of leading questions

Participants who believed the car was traveling faster were more likely to falsely recall seeing broken glass, suggesting that leading questions can alter memory

New cards
6

What does the response bias explanation suggest

The wording of the question influences how participants decide to answer but does not change their actual memeory

New cards
7

What does the substitution explanation suggest

The wording of a leading question actually changes the participants memory of the event

New cards
8

How can post event discussion affect eyewitness testimony

Memory can be altered or contaminated through discussing the event with others or repeated questioning

New cards
9

What did Gabbert et al (2003) study?

Pairs of participants watched a crime from different perspectives, discussed it, then recalled what they saw

New cards
10

What were the findings of Gabbert et al. study?

71% of participants mistakenly mistakenly recalled items they had not actually seen but learned from their discussion

New cards
11

What is memory conformity

When witnesses go along with each other’s memories, often to gain soical approval

New cards
12

How can repeat interviewing affect eyewitness testimony

Each interview increases the chance that the interviewer’s comments become part of the witness’s memory

New cards
13

Why is Loftus and Palmer’s study considered artificial

Participants watched film clips instead of experiencing real accidents, which lack the stress and emotional impact of real life events

New cards
14

What was the Disney study on misleading information

Collage students viewed misleading advertisements about Disneyland featuring Bugs Bunny or Ariel. Those exposed to this misinformation were more likely to falsely recall meeting these characters

New cards
robot