Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Neoclassical economics
migration stems from geographical differences with supply and demand for labor. people move from low-wage paying countries to high-wage
Shortcomings of neoclassical economics
wage inequality doesn’t track immigration well. circular migration from Mexico was popular till 80s and expected income is only ONE motivation for international migration
New economics of labor migration
explains that migration is a decision made by the entire household to improve economic circumstances
World systems theory
international migration is linked to changes to the structure of global markets. People live their countries due to ‘push’ factors and come to countries with good ‘pull’ factors.
the same factors that influence movement of goods, capital, and information are the ones that promote the flow of people by reducing the costs of movement
Segmented labor market theory
immigration is more influenced by the ‘pull’ factors in receiving countries
two labor markets
primary: formal, secure, good salaries and benefits
secondary: informal, dangerous, not secure
theory argues that employers turn to immigrants to fill low-wage jobs when they can’t attract native workers
Social capital theory
interpersonal ties increase the likelihood of international migration because they lower costs and risks of movement, with increased expected net returns of migration
Cumulative causation theory
migration becomes more likely over time as people gain experience and form social ties
create a black market in migration services through the use of coyotes
Old vs. New Destinations
immigrant trends could affect crime differently in new destinations
rooted in social disorganization if communities can’t meet residents’ needs
new destinations provide LESS immigrant opportunity and immigrants are LESS socially and economically integrated
Racial Differences
immigration could increase black violent crime by displacing workers
immigration could also increase latino violence in new immigrant destinations
data is shown to be very cross-sectionally based which is a major limitation
Undocumented Immigration?
undocumented immigration can increase crime
does it increase violent crime? NO
however, revenue-producing crimes could be more common among immigrants
undocumented immigrants are NEGATIVELY ASSOCIATED with violence
there are challenges with public perception and political rhetoric that can also implicate public policy
Undocumented Immigration, Drugs, and Alcohol Problems
there is no correlation between undocumented immigration and the # of DUI and drug arrests/deaths
Undocumented Immigration and Terrorism
immigration policy was hard to separate from counterterrorism policy after 9/11, but, as undocumented immigration RISES, there is NO CHANGE with the # of terrorism events, cases, and radicalization
Does Immigration Reinforcement Reduce Crime?
Secure Communities — every person arrested for a crime by local law enforcement is screened by federal government for immigration violations
was not effective and there was no impact on crime.
only impact served on less serious crimes
local immigration enforcement undermines public safety by marginalizing immigrant communities and impeding cooperation between police and residents
Do sanctuary policies affect crime?
neighborhoods benefit most from immigrant concentration in terms of homicide reduction
as immigration INCREASES, homicides rates DECREASE in sanctuary cities
no change in non-sanctuary
political contexts that are more favored bolster social organization
Do amnesty policies affect crime?
amnesty has NO EFFECT on violent crime, but did decrease property crime
Doesn’t any crime by an undocumented immigrant increase crime?
if the metric for increasing violent crime is that any person of a specific group has committed a crime, then this can be applied to any sort of group
Do undocumented immigrants commit more crime?
no crime reporting system asks about immigration status and data reporting has gotten worse
crime rates for property, drugs, violent, and traffic among undocumented immigrants remain low for undocumented immigrants compared to legal immigrants and US citizens
Historical changes in immigration and crime
The incarceration rates for US born citizens was higher compared to 1st gen immigrants of different racial groups around 1960 and remains so.
Education status is a strong correlate for going to prison
There are no changes to immigration policy that would impact crime
Underreporting can’t be a factor because declines are observed from sending regions, citizens, and before increased deportations happened
There is a huge incarceration gap as part of a trend of growing differences between immigrants and US born
Dillingham Commission
Congress funded this high-level commission to research the causes and impact of recent immigration to build support for significant restrictions on European immigration.
The report's recommendations helped justify immigration restriction acts passed during and after World War I.
The report's recommendations influenced American views on immigration and increased support for restrictive immigration laws in the 1920s.
Wickersham Commission
The Wickersham Commission, officially the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, was established by President Herbert Hoover to investigate the causes and costs of crime, including the enforcement of Prohibition, and also included an examination of crime and immigration.
The commission's report, particularly the volume examining crime and foreign-born Americans, found that immigrants were not disproportionately involved in crime compared to native-born Americans.