1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
liberalism + the state
In a state of nature, individuals would at times have disagreements over their interests as they each pursued their own self-fulfilment
A state is therefore necessary to provide formal structures to judge + resolve disputes fairly, rather than just the strongest winning out
The premise of the liberal state however developed over time from this basic justification to incorporate wider principles, w modern liberals also endorsing meritocracy, equality of opportunity + justice
Objectives of the liberal state (classical)
Rejection of the ‘traditional’ state
Govt by consent
Promotion of natural rights/ individualism
Promotion of tolerance
Rejection of the ‘traditional’ state:
explicitly oppose monarchical absolutist + arbitrary rule, especially based on God’s will or ‘divine right’
govt by consent:
States legitimacy derives from the consent of the governed; they must have volunteered to be ruled
People can control, as citizens, not subjects (Locke: ‘govt should always be the servant, not master, of the people’
The State is a social contract- an agreement between govt + the governed- individuals accept the state’s restrictions, as long as it suits them (citizens can challenge state) + guarantees rights
promotion of natural rights/ individualism
Outside the state individuals hold ‘natural rights’, so it would not be rational to abandon these + submit unconditionally; state must promote natural rights
promotion of tolerance
Linked to individualism- people must be free to seek self-determination, w/out restriction
The state must tolerate all actions + opinions as long as they cause no harm (harm principle - J.S. Mill)
People aren’t isolated + detached- they’ll choose to form associations such as religions. These communities- esp minorities- must be allowed + protected; + the state shouldn’t interfere w them
objectives of the liberal state (modern)
meritocracy
equality of opportunity
justice
meritocracy + political power
Political power should be held by those who have gained it on merit, competence, integrity + the trust of the governed, rather than hereditary principle + aristocracy. None are ‘born to rule’
equality of opportunity
All people are born equal, so must have equal opportunity to develop to their full potential + take control of their lives
If the state provides equal opportunity, people are responsible for own success/ failure, not anyone else , or the state
justice + the state
State must embody justice- all can expect to be treated fairly, w/out discrimination + assume they can get a just outcome in disputes (rule of law)
how a liberal state can be achieved/ guaranteed?
constitutional/ limited govt
fragmented govt
formal equality
constitutional/ limited govt
Social contract must be formalised in a codified constitution, based on discussion + consensus - avoids arbitrary use of power
Govts must be limited by pre-arranged rules + can’t be able to erode citizens’ natural rights
modern e.g.s of a constitutional/ limited govt
separation of powers
Bicameralism (2 houses in parl)
Supreme Court
HRA
fragmented govt
Avoid concentration of power as this causes corruption + use checks + balances to maintain this
Involve as many as possible in decision making (as all people are rational)
modern e.g.s of fragmented govt
Devolution/ decentralisation/ federalism
Referenda
Checks and balances
formal equality
All individuals are born equal, so should have equal legal + political rights
No one is outside or above the law (rule of laws)
modern e.g.s of formal equality
Equality act 2010
Widening participation
Liberals believe in individualism + capitalism. But these can only work together when ___?
overseen by a certain type of state