Debating the Definition of Antisemitism

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

8 Terms

1
New cards

IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) Definition of Antisemitism

  • Antisemitism is a perception of Jews that can develop into hatred, leading to discrimination or violence against Jewish people.

  • Focuses on how people perceive Jews rather than only on actions.

  • Example: perceiving Jews as engaged in a political takeover or global conspiracy.

  • Directed toward Jewish people, not just Jewish beliefs or practices.

2
New cards

Examples of Antisemitic Behavior (according to IHRA)

  • Denying or minimizing the atrocities of the Holocaust.

  • Accusing Jews of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

  • Accusing Jewish people of being more loyal to Israel or to Jewish causes than to their home country (“dual-loyalty claim”).

  • Claiming Jews are obligated to support the Jewish state over their own nation-state.

  • Denying the Jewish people’s right to self-determination (for example, claiming that the existence of Israel is a racist endeavor).

  • Applying double standards to Israel by demanding behavior not expected of any other democratic nation.

3
New cards

Dual-Loyalty Claim

  • The accusation that Jewish people are more loyal to Israel or Jewish interests than to their own country.

  • Implies Jews cannot fully belong to their nation-state.

  • Considered antisemitic under IHRA.

4
New cards

Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism (JDA)

  • Emphasizes that something can be unreasonable or unfair without being antisemitic.

  • Tries to separate criticism of Israel’s government or policies from hatred of Jews as a people.

  • Uses the phrase “Jews have the right to exist and flourish” instead of “self-determination.”

  • Avoids predetermining what a Jewish state must look like — allows multiple political possibilities.

  • States that criticism of how Israel functions as a state is not automatically antisemitic, as long as it doesn’t:

    • Deny Jewish collective rights, or

      • Use antisemitic tropes.

5
New cards

States that criticism of how Israel functions as a state is not automatically antisemitic, as long as it doesn’t:

Deny Jewish collective rights, or

Use antisemitic tropes.

6
New cards

IHA differ

Suggests that anti-Zionism (denying the legitimacy of a Jewish state) can be antisemitic.

7
New cards

JDA difer

  • Asserts that Jews have the right to flourish in Israel.

Criticism of Zionism or Israeli policies is not inherently antisemitic.

8
New cards

Nexus Document

  • A framework to guide institutions (especially schools and universities) on identifying and addressing antisemitism.

  • Focuses on creating clear rules and distinctions for when criticism of Israel crosses into antisemitism.

  • Seeks to help academic and policy contexts handle these debates consistently.