1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
IL and imperialism
International law's universalization is inextricably linked with the spread of European empires, both formal and informal, across the world
Formal empires: country goes and plants flag
Informal empires: sphere of influence
Non-western entities' sovereignty was recognised in order for them to be able to conclude agreements which either extinguished or limited their sovereignty
You were sovereign for the purpose of accepting your colonial status —> to then relinquish your sovereignty
Eg Africa
Local political leaders gave up their powers
International law regulated not only the conditions for the takeover of new territories, but also mediated conflicts between colonial powers
IL was part of the process of imperialism
Used vertical and horizontally
19th century and the Westphalian system
The 19th century saw the rise of the sovereign state/nation-state on the European model, but semi-sovereign and non-sovereign entitles abounded
Colonizers concerned with external autonomy, did not care much about what they did internally
19th century non-Westphalian systems
colonies
Protectorates
Congo free state
Condominiums
Suzerian/vassal
Dominions
Leased territories
Protectorates
Give up sovereignty in exchange for military protection
Ex. Trucial states
‘Congo Free State’
legal imperialism
Condominiums
Colony where two powers or more share sovereignty equally
Ex. British and French aka Clem
Ex. New Hebrides
Suzerain/Vassal
Hierarchical system —> medieval vocabulary revived
Used IL to change
Ex. Tibet recognized as Chinese vassal, but no one knew what this meant
Ex. UK/South African Republic
Dominions
British territories that never achieved sovereign government → both internal and external
Opposite end of colonies
Ex. Canada and Australia
Leased territories
Still exist
Territory in Cuba is leased by US
Pay money, get a degree of control of territory
The standard of civilization
Central idea of 19th century
a putative set of (objective, empirical) criteria states (usually non-western) had to meet before being admitted to the ‘Family of Nations’
Was it an objective set of criteria to be achieved (Gong) or a moving goal that could never be achieved (Anghie?)
Move the goal post when non-western nations started getting close to criteria
Debatable if this criteria was achievable for non-western states
Non-western states which retained their legal sovereignty had an ambiguous position within the international system (japan, China, Siam, Abyssinia, etc)
Got recognized as civilized
Ex. Japan accepted as civilized bc it was able to defeat Russia
Not part of ‘Family of Nations’ but still sovereign countries
Brazil part of family of nations and civilized but considered second tier (not a western country)
What ran parallel with the rise of institutions?
The shift from natural law to positivism
with more state practice to draw on, the positivist approach became more viable
the rise of institutions
Intergovernmental organization (IGOs): first entities other than states to have a distinct legal personality
First IGO: the Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine (1815)
Post napoleon war —> navigation on the Rhine was nationalized
Other important IGOs: International Telegraph Union; Universal Postal Union — rise of permanent secretariats
International NGOs too — Red Cross
Unique: guardian of multiple treaties
Can only be a member of a committee if you are a Swiss citizen since Switzerland is neutral
Growth in technology an important emperors for the development of IGOs
Rise of institutions: codification treaties
utilitarians like Bentham pushed for the codification of IL, in belief that it would enhance its binding effect
Rise of institutions: some important codification landmarks
Congress of Vienna (1815): law on diplomatic agents and diplomatic missions
First Geneva Convention (1864): treatment of wounded combatants and civilians
Hague Conventions (1899 & 1907): permanent court of Arbitration; laws of war; prohibit action on use of certain weapons (aerial bombardment, gases)
Aerial bombardment: banned for 10 years, not renewed —> is now legal
First World War and aftermath
enormous destruction wrought by the 1st WW fueled demands for a new type of international order with aim to ensure peace
The League of Nations 1920: created by Treaty of Versailles to maintain world peace through
Disarmament
Collective security
Peaceful settlement of international disputes
1st WW and aftermath: self-determination
the idea that peoples had the right to their own sovereign states and determine own future
became established after ww1
Who is people? How are boundaries to be drawn?
In practice: did not extend to non-western peoples
Especially for the people under the power of the defeated nations
1st WW and aftermath: League of Nations mixed record
one hand, is solved a number of international disputes, combatted epidemics and slavery, resettled refugees, strengthened IL, concluded disarmament treaties, etc
On the other hand, the collective security mechanisms never fully functioned bc of political consideration and it was unable to prevent the outbreak of the 2nd WW
League of Nations shortcomings: Japan ex
Japanese’s invasion of Manchuria
LoN appointed commission of investigation which found against japan
Reaction: japan withdrew from LoN
League of Nations shortcoming: Italy ex
Italian invasion of Abyssinia
LoN imposed economic sanctions of Italy
The sanctions were ineffective, enforced half-heartedly and soon dropped by most powers
League of Nations shortcomings: Soviet ex
soviet invasion of Finland
in almost its very last act, the LoN expelled the USSR but by then it no longer mattered
What was the post-2nd WW era the birth of?
Birth of modern international criminal justice
2nd WW international criminal system example
defendants in Nuremberg and Tokyo were prosecuted for:
crimes against humanity
Crime of aggression
War crimes
They were never prosecuted for genocide as it was not a separate crime till later
Most were convicted —> hanged for crimes
Contested but they had fair trials
Post 2nd WW new international treaties
Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948
Refugee Convention 1951
GATT 1947
Key UN components for IL
General assembly
power to pass non-binding resolutions — soft law
Security council
Enforcement organ in cases of major breaches of international law
International Court of Justice
Peaceful settlement of international disputes
International La Commission
Progressive codification of IL
Decolonization/self-determination
much post-war decolonization took place before the emergence on an international norm against colonialism
1960: UN GA Resolution 1514
Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial counties and peoples
UN then became a platform for the Third World to delegitimize colonialism — and sovereign states became the only acceptable mode of self-determination
Uti possidetis juris (as you possessed) was the guiding principle
Colonies achieved independence within existing colonial boundaries
This principle was meant to avoid civil conflict, but still numerous was were fought within post-colonial states as result
Post-cold war challenges
end of Cold War was supposed to remove the main remaining obstacle to a new, legalized, international system
But quickly fissures began
Challenges:
Sovereignty/non-interference
Key institutions in post war era
Post Cold War challenges: sovereignty/non-interference
increasingly viewed by many western countries as an obstacle to the spread of human rights and democracy
But remains a core propel of IL prized by non-western countries
Post Cold War challenges: key institutions in post war era
a perception that they have not adjusted to the changes in the international order since their creation