HOS Big ideas- unit 2, the senses

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/117

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

118 Terms

1
New cards

Who wrote De Anima?

Aristotle (384–322 BCE), Greek philosopher and student of Plato.

2
New cards

What is De Anima about?

Aristotle’s treatise on the soul (psyche), exploring its nature, faculties, and relationship to the body, including perception, thought, and life functions.

3
New cards

Where was Aristotle when he wrote De Anima?

Athens, Greece, while teaching at his Lyceum.

4
New cards

What is the significance of De Anima?

  • Foundation of Aristotelian psychology and philosophy of mind.

  • Introduced the idea that the soul is the “form” of the body, uniting mind and matter.

  • Influenced medieval scholastic thought (e.g., Thomas Aquinas).

  • Laid groundwork for later debates on perception, consciousness, and life sciences.

5
New cards

Why did Aristotle write De Anima?

To systematically study life, perception, and cognition, and to explain how the soul enables living beings to act, think, and experience the world.

6
New cards

Who wrote Discourse on the Method?

René Descartes (1596–1650), French philosopher, mathematician, and scientist.

7
New cards

What is Part 4 of Discourse on the Method about?

Descartes applies his method of doubt and reason to the sciences, exploring how humans can acquire certain knowledge and develop scientific understanding through systematic reasoning and experimentation.

8
New cards

Where was Descartes working when he wrote this?

The work was published in Leiden, Netherlands, although Descartes spent much of his life in France and the Dutch Republic.

9
New cards

Why did Descartes write this work?

To provide a methodological approach for attaining truth in science and philosophy, rejecting reliance on tradition or unexamined authority. He aimed to create a universal method to reach certainty in knowledge.

10
New cards

What are the key ideas in Part 4?

  • Knowledge must be built on clear and distinct ideas.

  • Use systematic doubt to eliminate false beliefs.

  • Apply mathematical reasoning and methodical steps to science.

  • Focus on understanding physical nature and human physiology as part of natural philosophy.

  • Demonstrates application of his method to practical scientific problems.

11
New cards

Why is Part 4 significant?

  • Marks a turning point in the Scientific Revolution, linking philosophy and empirical science.

  • Provides a framework for rationalism, emphasizing reason over tradition.

  • Influenced later thinkers in natural science, medicine, and philosophy.

  • Helped establish the principle that scientific knowledge must be systematic, demonstrable, and methodical.

12
New cards

Who wrote On Human Sense and Perception?

Margaret Cavendish (1623–1673), English aristocrat, philosopher, and writer.

13
New cards

What is On Human Sense and Perception about?

Cavendish explores how humans perceive the world, critiquing mechanistic views of the senses and arguing that perception involves active engagement, interpretation, and imagination, not just passive reception.

14
New cards

When was this work written?

Mid-17th century (published in 1666 in Observations upon Experimental Philosophy and related essays).

15
New cards

Where was Cavendish writing and publishing?

England, primarily London; she was active in the intellectual circles of the English court.

16
New cards

Why did Cavendish write about sense and perception?

To challenge the mechanical philosophy of contemporaries like Descartes and Hobbes, emphasizing that humans actively shape their knowledge of the world through their senses and minds.

17
New cards

What are the main ideas in On Human Sense and Perception?

  • Perception is active and interpretive, not passive.

  • Humans interact with matter and motion through senses.

  • Critiques mechanistic reduction of humans to purely physical processes.

  • Imagination and reasoning are essential to understanding the world.

18
New cards

Why is this work important?

  • arly feminist contribution to philosophy of mind and science.

  • Offers an alternative to Cartesian dualism and mechanical philosophy.

  • Emphasizes the interconnectedness of mind, body, and environment.

  • Influenced later debates about perception, knowledge, and scientific method.

19
New cards

what did descartes emphasize about the senses?

René Descartes emphasized that the senses are fallible and can be deceptive, so they cannot be fully trusted as a source of certain knowledge.

  • He argued that reason and rational thought are more reliable than sensory experience.

  • While the senses provide information about the world, Descartes maintained that only clear and distinct ideas, arrived at through methodical reasoning, guarantee certainty.

  • This is why he famously begins with systematic doubt—questioning all sensory-based beliefs to arrive at indubitable knowledge.

20
New cards

and how did cavendish deny this?

Margaret Cavendish denied Descartes’ strict distrust of the senses by arguing that perception is active, interpretive, and essential for knowledge.

  • She believed that humans engage with the world through their senses, not just passively receive information.

  • Cavendish critiqued the mechanistic view that reduces perception to mere physical processes or faulty inputs.

  • For her, reason and imagination work in conjunction with the senses; one cannot fully separate mind from bodily experience.

  • Essentially, she rejected the idea that reason alone provides certain knowledge, emphasizing that senses are indispensable for understanding and interacting with the world.

21
New cards

What is sensory history and how does it differ from the history of the senses?

  • Sensory history studies how humans experience, interpret, and use their senses in social and cultural contexts.

  • History of the senses focuses on theories and physiological understandings of the senses across time.

22
New cards

What is the sensorium?

The central organ or system of the body through which humans perceive the world; classically associated with the five senses: sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch.

23
New cards

How did ancient Greeks theorize the senses?

  • Democritus (c. 460–370 BCE): Two forms of knowledge – genuine (refined, intellectual) vs. obscure (from the senses).

  • Plato (427–347 BCE): Senses are limited and deceptive; reason is superior.

  • Aristotle (384–322 BCE): Hierarchy of senses: sight > hearing > smell > taste > touch.

24
New cards

How did Galen and Ibn Sina understand the senses?

  • Galen (129–c. 216 CE): Distinguished between external senses (sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch) and internal senses (imagination, memory, estimation).

  • Ibn Sina (980–1037): Expanded on Galen; emphasized mental vs. physical senses, and their role in perception and cognition.

25
New cards

What is the difference between mechanism and sensualism in sensory theory?

  • Mechanism (Descartes, 1596–1650): Mind and body are separate (Cartesian dualism); senses are fallible and mechanistic, reason is primary.

  • Sensualism (Locke, 1632–1704): Knowledge comes from experience via the senses; the mind is a blank slate.

  • Cavendish (1623–1674): Advocated vitalist mechanism and sensualism, arguing that senses actively contribute to knowledge.

26
New cards

Why are debates about the senses important?

  • They are debates about how perception and thought work.

  • They shape the foundation of scientific knowledge, influencing how humans study nature and interact with the world.

27
New cards

How did Aristotle understand the senses?

Hierarchy of senses: sight > hearing > smell > taste > touch; senses connect the body to knowledge but are less reliable than reason.

28
New cards

How did Descartes understand the senses?

Mechanistic and dualist: senses are fallible instruments; reason alone provides certainty (Cogito ergo sum).

29
New cards

How did Locke understand the senses?

Sensualism: all knowledge comes from experience via the senses; mind begins as a tabula rasa.

30
New cards

How did Cavendish understand the senses?

Vitalist mechanism + sensualism: senses are active and interpretive, inseparable from reason and imagination; perception is central to knowledge.

31
New cards

What is the main difference between these thinkers?

  • Aristotle: senses feed reason; hierarchy matters.

  • Descartes: senses are deceptive; reason rules.

  • Locke: senses are foundation of knowledge.

  • Cavendish: senses actively shape knowledge, alongside imagination and reason.

32
New cards

What did Galileo observe in The Starry Messenger?

Moons of Jupiter, stars invisible to the naked eye, surface details of the Moon, and Milky Way as composed of many stars.

33
New cards

Who was Galileo Galilei?

Italian astronomer, physicist, and mathematician (1564–1642) who pioneered telescope-based observations.

34
New cards

When was The Starry Messenger published?

1610.

35
New cards

Where did Galileo make his observations?

Italy (primarily Venice), using a telescope.

36
New cards

Why did Galileo write The Starry Messenger?

To document celestial discoveries and challenge Aristotelian-Ptolemaic cosmology while supporting the Copernican heliocentric model.

37
New cards

What is the significance of The Starry Messenger?

Revolutionized astronomy, emphasized instrumental observation, and helped establish the Scientific Revolution.

38
New cards

Who was Robert Hooke?

English scientist, architect, and Royal Society member (1635–1703) known for microscopy.

39
New cards

What did Hooke observe in Micrographia?

Microscopic structures of plants, insects, and materials; introduced the term “cell” for cork structures.

40
New cards

When was Micrographia published?

1665.

41
New cards

Where did Hooke conduct his studies?

London, England.

42
New cards

Why did Hooke write Micrographia?

To reveal previously unseen microscopic structures and demonstrate the value of magnified observation.

43
New cards

What is the significance of Micrographia?

Opened microscopy as a scientific method, laid groundwork for cell theory, and emphasized precise visual documentation.

44
New cards

Who was Margaret Cavendish?

English aristocrat, philosopher, and writer (1623–1673) critical of mechanistic science.

45
New cards

What did Cavendish argue in “Of Micrography”?

Critiqued over-reliance on microscopes, emphasizing senses, reason, and imagination in studying nature.

46
New cards

Where did Cavendish live and write?

England.

47
New cards

When was “Of Micrography” published?

1668.

48
New cards

Why did Cavendish critique micrography?

To caution against blind trust in instruments and advocate for a more holistic approach to knowledge.

Cavendish argued for the importance of subjectivity and embodied knowledge in science, questioning gendered exclusions from experimental practice and influencing early debates about the role of the senses and perception in knowledge production.

49
New cards

Who was Jonathan Swift?

Irish satirist and author (1667–1745).

50
New cards

What did Swift do in Gulliver’s Travels?

Satirized scientists and intellectuals, mocking extreme attention to detail and impractical scholarship (e.g., the Laputans).

51
New cards

When was Gulliver’s Travels published?

1726.

52
New cards

Where was Swift from and where was it published?

Ireland (Swift); published in England.

53
New cards

Why did Swift write Gulliver’s Travels?

To critique scientific rationalism, society, and politics, and highlight absurdities in knowledge detached from practical reality.

54
New cards

What is the significance of Gulliver’s Travels?

cultural perceptions of science and knowledge, exposing the social consequences of scientific authority and the limits of human understanding, influencing both literature and discussions of scientific ethics.

55
New cards

What was Plato’s theory of vision?

Emission/extramission theory – vision occurs when the eye emits rays that touch objects.

56
New cards

What was Aristotle’s theory of vision?

Early intromission theory – objects send off forms or particles that enter the eye via a medium.

57
New cards

What is the difference between intromission and extramission theories of sight?

Intromission: objects emit particles that enter the eye. Extramission: the eye emits rays to perceive objects.

58
New cards

How did Leonardo da Vinci contribute to understanding vision?

Studied optics, anatomy of the eye, and the mechanics of perception; emphasized the role of light and the lens.

59
New cards

How did Descartes understand vision?

Mechanistic perspective: the eye as a physical instrument transmitting images to the brain; emphasized Cartesian dualism.

emphasizing the separation of mind and body; explored mechanistic explanations for bodily and sensory functions; promoted rational deduction as the basis for scientific knowledge.

prioritizing reason and mechanistic explanations over purely sensory experience, shaping early modern debates about perception, the body, and the mind in science.

60
New cards

What experiments did Newton perform related to vision?

Prism experiments (1666, 1704) showing that white light is composed of colors; studied optical phenomena and afterimages.

Newton revolutionized science by combining empirical observation with mathematical description, showing how human senses (enhanced with experiments) could uncover natural laws, and establishing a model of modern experimental physics and optics.

61
New cards

Why was sight historically considered the most important sense?

Sight enables knowledge of the world, supports reasoning, and has symbolic value (e.g., “Eye of Providence”).

62
New cards

How did perspective painting (15th c.) relate to vision?

Used geometry to create realism, showing how visual theory shapes artistic representation.

63
New cards

Which technologies changed how people saw the world?

Telescope (c. 1608-9), microscope (c. 1620), magic lanterns, phantasmagoria; enhanced observation and imagination.

64
New cards

How did Kepler contribute to vision science?

Wrote Astronomiae Pars Optica (1604); explained optics and the retinal image; improved telescope understanding.

65
New cards

How did Galileo advance vision and observation?

Used the telescope (1609) to observe celestial bodies; improved empirical understanding of vision and astronomy.

66
New cards

Who was Antonie van Leeuwenhoek?

Dutch scientist (1632-1723), pioneer of microscopy; observed microscopic organisms and detailed natural structures.

Leeuwenhoek opened up an entirely new world of observation, laying the foundation for microbiology, demonstrating the value of careful sensory observation enhanced by instruments, and advancing the scientific method by emphasizing direct, empirical evidence.

67
New cards

What was Hooke’s contribution to vision and science?

Micrographia (1665) documented microscopic structures, coined “cell,” linking observation to discovery.

68
New cards

How did Hevelius contribute to vision and science?

Mapped the Moon (1647) using telescopic observation; improved accuracy in astronomical visuals.

69
New cards

How does Gulliver’s Travels relate to vision?

Satirized observation and scientific perception, questioning the limits of what we see and understand.

70
New cards

How did advances in vision science affect culture?

Shaped art, literature, and imagination; enabled new ways of seeing the world and understanding nature.

71
New cards

How does how we see shape what we can imagine?

Tools and theories of vision expand perception, allowing humans to conceptualize things beyond unaided sight.

72
New cards

Who was René-Théophile-Hyacinthe Laennec?

French physician (1781–1826), known for inventing the stethoscope and advancing clinical methods in chest medicine.

73
New cards

What is A Treatise on the Diseases of the Chest and on Mediate Auscultation?

Laennec’s 1818 work introducing mediate auscultation (using the stethoscope) to listen to heart and lung sounds for diagnosing chest diseases.

74
New cards

When was Laennec’s treatise published?

1818.

75
New cards

Where did Laennec develop and practice his methods?

Paris, France; primarily at the Necker Hospital.

76
New cards

Why did Laennec develop mediate auscultation?

To improve accuracy in diagnosing chest diseases, especially when direct auscultation (ear to chest) was impractical or imprecise.

77
New cards

What is the significance of Laennec’s work?

Revolutionized clinical medicine, introduced systematic auscultation, influenced pulmonary and cardiac diagnosis, and led to the modern stethoscope.

aennec revolutionized clinical medicine by showing that the physician’s senses could be mediated through instruments, combining objectivity with careful observation, and establishing modern auscultation as a standard diagnostic tool.

78
New cards

Who was J. Nicholas Mitchell?

American physician and medical writer, active in the late 19th century, focused on the moral, emotional, and intellectual aspects of medical practice.

79
New cards

What is The Physician or Doctor of Medicine, from the Intellectual, the Emotional, and the Moral Standpoint?

A 1893 text exploring the qualities and ethical responsibilities of physicians, emphasizing professionalism and moral character.

80
New cards

When was Mitchell’s book published?

1893.

81
New cards

Where was Mitchell’s work published and practiced?

United States, likely within American medical education and professional contexts.

82
New cards

Why did Mitchell write this work?

To address the holistic development of physicians, stressing that medical expertise must include intellectual rigor, emotional sensitivity, and moral integrity.

83
New cards

What is the significance of Mitchell’s work?

Mitchell highlights the centrality of the senses in medical diagnosis and practice, showing how subjective experience and observation were essential to building reliable medical knowledge before full reliance on instruments and laboratory methods.

84
New cards

How did physicians historically use their senses in diagnosis?

Physicians used sight, touch, hearing, smell, and taste to observe patients (e.g., countenance, pulse, urine) to detect disease. This included pulse-taking, uroscopy, percussion, and mediate auscultation (Laennec).

85
New cards

What did Hippocrates emphasize about observation in acute diseases?

Observing the patient’s countenance and bodily signs was crucial; deviations from healthy appearance indicated disease severity.

86
New cards

What did Galen argue about using the senses in medicine?

He emphasized trusting sensory observation over mere theoretical reasoning; certain bodily faculties could be directly recognized by the senses.

87
New cards

What did 19th-century physicians say about training the senses?

Physicians must cultivate all five senses to reason from cause to effect effectively; sensory training was essential for clinical expertise.

88
New cards

Why were the physician’s senses long-lasting and widespread diagnostic tools?

They allowed direct, immediate assessment of disease, provided a basis for standardized clinical observation, and were trainable skills that enhanced expertise.

89
New cards

How did early scientists use their senses to study nature?

Scientists like Redi, Vesalius, Aldrovandi, and Galileo relied on direct observation, dissection, telescopes, microscopes, and careful sensory experimentation to produce new knowledge.

90
New cards

How did Francesco Redi use his senses in experiments?

Through observation and controlled experiments (e.g., 1668 Experiments on the Generation of Insects) to challenge ancient authority on spontaneous generation.

91
New cards

How did Vesalius use the senses in anatomy?

Vesalius conducted direct dissections and visual observation of the human body (De Humani Corporis Fabrica, 1543), moving beyond reliance on ancient texts.

92
New cards

How did instruments mediate human senses?

Telescopes, microscopes, and stethoscopes extended vision, touch, and hearing, allowing scientists to detect phenomena beyond natural sensory limits.

93
New cards

How did Galileo use his senses in science?

Galileo observed celestial bodies through the telescope (Starry Messenger, 1610), producing new knowledge about the heavens beyond unaided sight.

Galileo advanced scientific observation and experimentation, bridging the senses and instruments (like the telescope) to generate knowledge; he exemplifies the shift toward objectivity and empirical evidence in early modern science.

94
New cards

What is the epistemological lesson from sensory-based science?

Trusting trained senses, validating observations through repeatable experiments, and using instruments were central to moving from subjective experience to objective scientific knowledge.

95
New cards

when was the fabrica written

De Humani Corporis Fabrica by Andreas Vesalius was written in 1543.

96
New cards

Who wrote Scientific Culture and what was his profession?

Josiah Parsons Cooke, an American chemist and Harvard University professor.

97
New cards

What is Scientific Culture about?

It is an essay advocating the integration of science into general education, emphasizing scientific literacy and rational thinking.

98
New cards

Why did Cooke write Scientific Culture?

To promote the idea that scientific education cultivates rational thought, moral improvement, and cultural enrichment.

99
New cards

Why is Scientific Culture significant?

  • He argued that scientific knowledge relied on the trained senses, careful observation, and personal experience.

  • Significance: Cooke represents a strand of 19th-century scientific culture that valued sensory experience, judgment, and embodied expertise, in contrast to purely quantitative, mechanical approaches.

Cooke championed the role of subjectivity, perception, and human judgment in making science reliable.

100
New cards

Who wrote The Grammar of Science and what was his profession?

Karl Pearson, a British mathematician, statistician, and philosopher of science.