Behavioural Approach to Explaining Phobias: Two - process model (2)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:49 AM on 4/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

9 Terms

1
New cards

What is the Two - Process model ?

  • The Two-Process Model (TPM) assumes that behaviour is learned through experience via environmental stimuli

2
New cards

What is the key to understanding the TPM ?

  • Behaviourism is key to understanding the TPM

  • The key assumptions and  mechanisms of behaviourism are:

    • Behaviour can be conditioned (learned) via classical conditioning and operant conditioning

    • Classical conditioning explains the development of phobias and operant conditioning explains the maintenance of phobias

    • Classical conditioning involves the transformation of a neutral stimulus into a conditioned stimulus, e.g., the bell rung by Pavlov which produced salivation in dogs 

    • Classical conditioning is learning by association e.g., the association of the bell with food (which is the unconditioned stimulus, as dogs - and people - do not have to learn to want to eat food)

    • Operant conditioning involves the role of reinforcement in behaviour e.g., the rats in Skinner’s experiments learnt to tap a lever in order to be rewarded with food (positive reinforcement) or to tap a lever in order to avoid an electric shock (negative reinforcement)

    • Operant conditioning is learning via consequences

3
New cards

What does the TPM state?

  • The TPM states that behaviours (such as phobias) are originally learned via the mechanisms of classical conditioning and are then maintained via the mechanisms of operant conditioning

4
New cards

How can classical conditioning be the starting point of the origin of a phobia (according to the TPM) ?

the onset of a phobia is as follows:

  • Ivan has no real feelings towards cats: he neither likes nor dislikes them so cats are the neutral stimulus (NS)

  • Every time Ivan visits his aunt, her cat scratches him (this is the unconditioned stimulus), which Ivan finds frightening and unpleasant (this is the unconditioned response)

  • After a few months Ivan finds that all cats now induce fear in him thus, all cats are now the conditioned stimulus and Ivan’s fear of them is the conditioned response

  • Ivan’s fear of one specific cat has now generalised to all cats, i.e., he has a cat phobia (ailurophobia) 

5
New cards

What is an example of how operant conditioning may be responsible for the maintenance of a phobia ?

  • Ivan goes out of his way to avoid cats

    • He stops visiting his aunt

    • He turns the television off if a cat appears on a programme

    • He walks a different way to work so that he won’t pass a house in which a ginger cat sits in the window

  • Ivan’s avoidance of cats is an example of negative reinforcement, as Ivan is taking steps to keep away from the phobic stimulus

  • Ivan’s avoidance of cats brings with it feelings of relief (his reward), which is an example of positive reinforcement thus, he will repeat the behaviours that bring this reward by continuing to avoid cats, resulting in his phobia persisting

6
New cards

Strength 1 Evaluation of the two - process model explanation of phobias

  • The case study of Little Albert (Watson & Rayner, 1920) offers research support for the development of phobias

    • Little Albert (9-month-old baby) showed no anxiety or fearwhen initially presented with a white rat

    • As part of the conditioning process, when the white rat was presented to Albert it was accompanied by a loud, frightening noise (made by banging an iron bar close to Albert's head)

    • The noise (UCS) created a fear response (UCR) in Albert

    • The pairing of the rat (NS) with the noise (UCS) initially created the fear response

    • Albert started to display fear when he saw the rat (NS) without the noise (UCS)

    • The rat became the CS producing the CR of fear

      • Thus the findings suggest the phobia was established via classical conditioning

7
New cards

Strength 2 Evaluation of the two - process model explanation of phobias

  • The TPM sets out the mechanisms via which phobias are conditioned, resulting in the development of  therapies such assystematic desensitisation, which work to reverse this process to successfully treat phobias

    • This means the TPM has useful application to treating phobias

8
New cards

Limitation 1 Evaluation of the two - process model explanation of phobias

  • The TPM only focuses on conditioning as a determinant of phobia development, which does not account for phobias that may have an evolutionary origin, e.g.,

    • fear of snakes (snakes may harm or kill humans thus, it makes sense to fear them)

    • heights (falling from a height will result in injury or death)

    • the dark (an enemy or predator may attack at night)

9
New cards

Limitation 2 Evaluation of the two - process model explanation of phobias

  • The TPM cannot explain why some people may have continuous aversive experiences and yet do not develop a phobia, e.g.:

    • people who were physically punished at school who do not develop school phobia (scolionophobia)

    • someone who was bitten by a dog as a child who does not develop cynophobia