1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Rule 26(f) conference
at least 21 days before the court’s scheduling order, parties meet and confer to discuss
production of required initial disclosures
claims
defenses
settlement
preservation of discoverable information
must present a detailed discovery plan no later than 14 days after the conference
views and proposals on timing
issues about discovery of ESI, including how it will be produced and any problems retrieving it
scheduling order
roadmap for how the litigation proceeds up to trial
cut-offs for joinder, amendment, motions, completion of discovery, etc.
pretrial conferences
final pretrial conference determines the issues to be tried and evidence to be proffered at trial
recorded in pretrial conference order, which supersedes the pleadings
jury trials generally
types of trials/hearings
jury trial — determines the facts and returns a verdict
bench trial — judge determines the facts with no jury
motion in limine — pretrial motion outside presence of jury to decide whether the jury should hear certain evidence
right to jury trial
Seventh Amendment — right to jury in civil actions (not in equity)
does not apply to state court
mixed suits of law and equity
facts underlying damage claim — tried to jury first
facts relating wholly to equity claim — tried to judge
fact underlies both claims — jury will decide that fact
party must demand jury in writing no later than 14 days after service of the last pleading addressing a jury triable issue (usually the answer)
selection and composition of jury
for cause challenges
juror may be challenged for cause, such as being impartial
unlimited
peremptory challenges
juror challenged for no reason, but may be used only in race- and gender-netural manner
limited to 3
number of jurors
minimum of 6, maximum of 12
all jurors must participate unless excused for good cause
verdict must be unanimous unless parties otherwise agree
jury instructions
jury decides facts on instruction by the judge
parties submit proposed instructions at the close of all evidence
judge may hold off the record conferences with parties about instructions
before final argument and instruction, and on the record, court informs parties:
what instructions it will give AND
what proposed jury instructions it rejected
parties must be allowed to object on the record and out of the jury’s hearing, even if during off-record conference
if objection not made before jury is charged (given instructions) — objection waived
can be revisited only for clear error affecting a party’s rights
forms of verdicts
determined by judge
general verdict
says who wins and, if plaintiff, what the relief is
special verdict
jury answer, in writing, specific written questions about the facts in dispute
does not say who wins or loses
general verdict with written questions
jury not only gives a general verdict, but also answers specific questions
entry of judgment
if general verdict — clerk of court enters the judgment
if special verdict (or gen. w/ written questions) AND answers consistent with each other and with verdict — judge approves and clerk enters it
if general verdict with written questions AND answers consistent with each other but inconsistent with verdict — court may enter appropriate judgment consistent with answers
or can tell jury to reconsider or order new trial
if general verdict with written questions AND answers inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with verdict — no judgment may be entered
or can tell jury to reconsider or order new trial
juror misconduct
verdict may be impeached upon external matters (juror bribed or verdict based on their investigation made outside of court)
new trial can be ordered
BUT verdict will not be set aside if misconduct was harmless
bench trial
judge must record her findings of fact orally on the record or in writing along with her conclusions of law
judgment also must be entered
motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL)
applies in jury trial
if granted, case will not go to jury
standard
reasonable people could not disagree on the result
evidence viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party
timing
can move any time before case is submitted to the jury BUT
may not be granted until party opposing the motion has been heard at trial on the issue
renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (RJMOL)
comes up after trial
prerequisites
party must have moved for JMOL at the proper time at trial — otherwise is waived
RMJOL motion must be based upon the same grounds as the JMOL motion
if granted — enters judgment for the party that lost the jury verdict
considered in light most favorable to nonmoving party
timing
must be made within 28 days after entry of judgment
motion for new trial
can be granted on an non-harmless error that makes the judge think there should b ea do-over
moving party must make motion within 28 days of judgment
some reasons for new trial
erroneous jury instruction
new evidence discovered that could not have been discovered before with due diligence
misconduct was committed by a juror, party, or lawyer
judgment is against weight of the evidence (serious error of judgment)
damages are inadequate or excessive (standard is whether the figure “shocks the conscience”)
remittitur (for plaintiff)
playing hardball with the plaintiff on damages
court offers plaintiff the choice to remit part of damages award OR go through a new trial
additur (for defendant)
playing hardball with defendant
court offers defendant the choice to add to the damage award OR go through a new trial
NOT ALLOWED IN FEDERAL COURT
offer of judgment
defendant can submit formal offers to settle the case up to 14 days before trial
contains cost-shifting provisions that apply when plaintiff rejects offer to settle but doesn’t do as well at trial
motion for relief form order or judgment (to set aside judgment)
clerical error
any time
mistake, excusable neglect (including viable defense)
reasonable time but never more than one year
fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by opposing party
reasonable time but never more than one year
newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered with due diligence for a new trial motion (newly discovered facts must have existed at the time of trial)
reasonable time but never more than one year
judgment is void (ex: no SMJ)
reasonable time with no maximum