conferences, trials, judgment, and post-trial motions

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:48 PM on 6/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

17 Terms

1
New cards

Rule 26(f) conference

at least 21 days before the court’s scheduling order, parties meet and confer to discuss

  • production of required initial disclosures

  • claims

  • defenses

  • settlement

  • preservation of discoverable information

must present a detailed discovery plan no later than 14 days after the conference

  • views and proposals on timing

  • issues about discovery of ESI, including how it will be produced and any problems retrieving it

2
New cards

scheduling order

roadmap for how the litigation proceeds up to trial

  • cut-offs for joinder, amendment, motions, completion of discovery, etc.

3
New cards

pretrial conferences

final pretrial conference determines the issues to be tried and evidence to be proffered at trial

  • recorded in pretrial conference order, which supersedes the pleadings

4
New cards

jury trials generally

types of trials/hearings

  • jury trial — determines the facts and returns a verdict

  • bench trial — judge determines the facts with no jury

  • motion in limine — pretrial motion outside presence of jury to decide whether the jury should hear certain evidence

right to jury trial

  • Seventh Amendment — right to jury in civil actions (not in equity)

    • does not apply to state court

  • mixed suits of law and equity

    • facts underlying damage claim — tried to jury first

    • facts relating wholly to equity claim — tried to judge

    • fact underlies both claims — jury will decide that fact

  • party must demand jury in writing no later than 14 days after service of the last pleading addressing a jury triable issue (usually the answer)

5
New cards

selection and composition of jury

for cause challenges

  • juror may be challenged for cause, such as being impartial

  • unlimited

peremptory challenges

  • juror challenged for no reason, but may be used only in race- and gender-netural manner

  • limited to 3

number of jurors

  • minimum of 6, maximum of 12

  • all jurors must participate unless excused for good cause

  • verdict must be unanimous unless parties otherwise agree

6
New cards

jury instructions

  • jury decides facts on instruction by the judge

  • parties submit proposed instructions at the close of all evidence

  • judge may hold off the record conferences with parties about instructions

before final argument and instruction, and on the record, court informs parties:

  • what instructions it will give AND

  • what proposed jury instructions it rejected

parties must be allowed to object on the record and out of the jury’s hearing, even if during off-record conference

  • if objection not made before jury is charged (given instructions) — objection waived

    • can be revisited only for clear error affecting a party’s rights

7
New cards

forms of verdicts

determined by judge

general verdict

  • says who wins and, if plaintiff, what the relief is

special verdict

  • jury answer, in writing, specific written questions about the facts in dispute

  • does not say who wins or loses

general verdict with written questions

  • jury not only gives a general verdict, but also answers specific questions

8
New cards

entry of judgment

if general verdict — clerk of court enters the judgment

if special verdict (or gen. w/ written questions) AND answers consistent with each other and with verdict — judge approves and clerk enters it

if general verdict with written questions AND answers consistent with each other but inconsistent with verdict — court may enter appropriate judgment consistent with answers

  • or can tell jury to reconsider or order new trial

if general verdict with written questions AND answers inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with verdict — no judgment may be entered

  • or can tell jury to reconsider or order new trial

9
New cards

juror misconduct

  • verdict may be impeached upon external matters (juror bribed or verdict based on their investigation made outside of court)

    • new trial can be ordered

  • BUT verdict will not be set aside if misconduct was harmless

10
New cards

bench trial

  • judge must record her findings of fact orally on the record or in writing along with her conclusions of law

  • judgment also must be entered

11
New cards

motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL)

  • applies in jury trial

  • if granted, case will not go to jury

  • standard

    • reasonable people could not disagree on the result

    • evidence viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party

  • timing

    • can move any time before case is submitted to the jury BUT

    • may not be granted until party opposing the motion has been heard at trial on the issue

12
New cards

renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (RJMOL)

  • comes up after trial

  • prerequisites

    • party must have moved for JMOL at the proper time at trial — otherwise is waived

    • RMJOL motion must be based upon the same grounds as the JMOL motion

  • if granted — enters judgment for the party that lost the jury verdict

    • considered in light most favorable to nonmoving party

  • timing

    • must be made within 28 days after entry of judgment

13
New cards

motion for new trial

  • can be granted on an non-harmless error that makes the judge think there should b ea do-over

  • moving party must make motion within 28 days of judgment

  • some reasons for new trial

    • erroneous jury instruction

    • new evidence discovered that could not have been discovered before with due diligence

    • misconduct was committed by a juror, party, or lawyer

    • judgment is against weight of the evidence (serious error of judgment)

    • damages are inadequate or excessive (standard is whether the figure “shocks the conscience”)

14
New cards

remittitur (for plaintiff)

  • playing hardball with the plaintiff on damages

  • court offers plaintiff the choice to remit part of damages award OR go through a new trial

15
New cards

additur (for defendant)

  • playing hardball with defendant

  • court offers defendant the choice to add to the damage award OR go through a new trial

NOT ALLOWED IN FEDERAL COURT

16
New cards

offer of judgment

defendant can submit formal offers to settle the case up to 14 days before trial

  • contains cost-shifting provisions that apply when plaintiff rejects offer to settle but doesn’t do as well at trial

17
New cards

motion for relief form order or judgment (to set aside judgment)

  • clerical error

    • any time

  • mistake, excusable neglect (including viable defense)

    • reasonable time but never more than one year

  • fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by opposing party

    • reasonable time but never more than one year

  • newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered with due diligence for a new trial motion (newly discovered facts must have existed at the time of trial)

    • reasonable time but never more than one year

  • judgment is void (ex: no SMJ)

    • reasonable time with no maximum