1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Becker
through interview of 60 teachers, found that teachers judge how closely pupils fit to the ‘ideal pupil’
Rist
fast learners MC sat at the front whilst WC and slower people sit at the back
Jorgensen
teachers have different expectations of ideal pupils: WC its obedient/shy whilst for MC its be smart and have a personality
Dunne
from 9 interviews they found that teachers normalised the underachievement of WC, they didn’t do anything to help them → focused on the smart MC
Rosenthal and Jacobson
done a study in California which suggested that teacher’s belief about the pupil is based on tests they do
Gillborn and Youdell
‘A to C economy’ and ‘educational triage’
Lacey
differentiation and polarisation
Woods
the responses to labelling: ingratiation, ritualism, retreatism, rebellion
Bourdieu
schools have MC habitus → so they get symbolic gain → WC don’t have this habitus so called symbolic violence
Archer
WC students felt they need to change how they talked and presented themselves to be academically successful → includes clothing (Nike Identities)
Ingram
study on 2 WC boys, one went to a grammar school and to fit in he wore tracksuits to get MC habitus but in result he got laughed at
Evans
WC girls from London were reluctant to apply to elite universities and those who did felt a sense of hidden barriers and of not fitting in