1/59
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Presumption of Innocence
Defendant presumed innocent; prosecution must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. Exam hook: burden never shifts
Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
Highest standard required for criminal conviction. Exam hook: due process requirement
Jury Nullification
Jury may acquit despite evidence but is not told of this power. Exam hook: power not right
Actus Reus
Criminal liability requires a voluntary act. Exam hook: thoughts alone not punishable
Voluntary Act
Willed bodily movement required for liability. Exam hook: involuntary acts excluded
Omissions Liability
Failure to act only criminal if legal duty exists. Exam hook: no general duty to rescue
Sources of Legal Duty
Statute, special relationship, contract, creation of risk, voluntary assumption. Exam hook: narrow categories
Mens Rea
Mental state required for each element of offense. Exam hook: element-by-element analysis
Purpose
Conscious objective to cause result. Exam hook: highest culpability
Knowledge
Awareness that result is practically certain. Exam hook: includes willful blindness
Recklessness
Conscious disregard of substantial and unjustifiable risk. Exam hook: awareness required
Negligence
Failure to perceive substantial and unjustifiable risk. Exam hook: should have known
Malice
Intent to kill or extreme indifference to human life. Exam hook: murder baseline
Strict Liability
No mens rea required; usually limited to minor offenses. Exam hook: disfavored for serious crimes
Mistake of Fact
Defense if it negates required mens rea. Exam hook: not an affirmative defense
Mistake of Law
Generally not a defense. Exam hook: ignorance no excuse
Causation
Requires cause-in-fact and proximate cause. Exam hook: two-step analysis
But-For Cause
Result would not occur without defendant’s conduct. Exam hook: baseline test
Substantial Factor
Used when multiple sufficient causes exist. Exam hook: overdetermination
Proximate Cause
Liability limited to foreseeable results. Exam hook: fairness limitation
Intervening Cause
Breaks chain if unforeseeable and abnormal. Exam hook: superseding cause
Intentional Murder
Unlawful killing with intent to kill (express malice). Exam hook: highest homicide
Premeditation
Requires reflection before killing. Exam hook: not instantaneous
Second-Degree Murder
Killing with malice but without premeditation. Exam hook: default murder
Voluntary Manslaughter
Intentional killing with adequate provocation. Exam hook: heat of passion
Adequate Provocation
Would cause reasonable person to lose control. Exam hook: objective standard
Extreme Emotional Disturbance
Mitigation based on reasonable explanation for loss of control. Exam hook: broader than provocation
Reckless Manslaughter
Killing with conscious disregard of risk. Exam hook: awareness key
Negligent Homicide
Killing from failure to perceive risk. Exam hook: lowest culpability homicide
Felony Murder
Death during felony = murder without intent to kill. Exam hook: strict liability shortcut
Merger Doctrine
Felony must be independent of killing. Exam hook: no bootstrapping assault
Inherently Dangerous Felony
Felony must pose risk to human life. Exam hook: limits doctrine
Agency Theory
Felony murder only if killing by felon or accomplice. Exam hook: majority rule
Proximate Cause Theory
Liability for any foreseeable death caused. Exam hook: minority rule
Attempt
Requires specific intent + substantial step. Exam hook: intent to complete crime
Substantial Step
Conduct strongly corroborates criminal intent. Exam hook: MPC approach
Dangerous Proximity
Must be very close to completing crime. Exam hook: CL approach
Impossibility
Not a defense if defendant believes crime possible. Exam hook: focus on belief
Abandonment
Defense if voluntary and complete renunciation. Exam hook: must not be external
Conspiracy
Agreement between two or more to commit crime. Exam hook: agreement is key
Specific Intent (Conspiracy)
Intent to agree and achieve criminal goal. Exam hook: dual intent
Overt Act
Some jurisdictions require act in furtherance. Exam hook: minimal step
Pinkerton Liability
Liable for foreseeable crimes of co-conspirators. Exam hook: vicarious liability
Withdrawal
Requires affirmative act to disavow conspiracy. Exam hook: stops future liability only
Accomplice Liability
Liable for aiding or encouraging crime. Exam hook: derivative liability
Actus Reus (Accomplice)
Must assist, encourage, or facilitate. Exam hook: mere presence not enough
Mens Rea (Accomplice)
Must intend to help crime succeed. Exam hook: purpose required
Natural & Probable Consequences
Liable for foreseeable additional crimes. Exam hook: controversial expansion
Self-Defense
Reasonable belief force is necessary to prevent imminent harm. Exam hook: necessity + imminence
Imminence
Threat must be immediate. Exam hook: no future harm
Duty to Retreat
Must retreat if safe (some jurisdictions). Exam hook: exceptions apply
Castle Doctrine
No duty to retreat in one’s home. Exam hook: home protection
Reasonableness (Self-Defense)
Subjective belief + objective reasonableness. Exam hook: hybrid standard
Proportionality
Deadly force only for deadly threats. Exam hook: match force
Imperfect Self-Defense
Unreasonable belief reduces murder to manslaughter. Exam hook: partial defense
Necessity
Crime justified to avoid greater harm. Exam hook: utilitarian defense
Duress
Crime committed under threat of imminent harm. Exam hook: coercion
Duress Limitation
Not a defense to murder (CL). Exam hook: strict rule
Intoxication (CL)
Only negates specific intent crimes. Exam hook: limited use
Involuntary Intoxication
Complete defense if not defendant’s fault. Exam hook: rare but powerfu