1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
gender socialisation
learning of socially approved behaviours
gender norms, values and attitudes that have been associated with a biological sex
social learning theory
learn gender specific behaviours from our same sex parent
men: typically at work
boys being socialised by mothers rebel against feminine behaviour in search of masculine influence
socialisation through male peer groups
encourage behaviours that are likely to lead to criminal behaviours
sex role theory
girls socialised: supervised, controlled
boys socialised: rougher, more opportunity to be deviant
women internalise values of care and empathy; reduce likelihood of committing crime → less likely to harm others
gender eval: chivarly factor
women don’t commit less crime, treated less harshly when they do
CJS male dominated, socialised to have protective attitudes towards women
leads to less sentences, less chance of conviction compared to male offenders
therefore, lower numbers seen in crime statistics for women
gender eval: ignores nature
testosterone levels - high levels linked to aggression, higher in males
evolutionary influence - males: protector, females: carer
oestrogen - linked to empathy/ caregiver behaviours, higher in women
gender eval: crime stats
heidensohn suggested gender differences are most significant feature of recorded crime
95% of uk prison pop male, men more cautioned than women
men are 8x more likely for robbery and drug offences
therefore, showcases gender differences in crime
differential association
considered social learning theory
slt: behaviour is learned through observation, imitating and vicarious reinforcement
criminal behaviour is learnt from intimate groups
insider trading, purse snatching
family, school friends, neighbourhood
three conditions to engage in criminal behaviour
person has learned requisite skills for committing crime
person has learned excess definitions favourable to crime of unfavourable
has objective opportunity to carry out crime
child born into family where parents tax fraud
‘everyone cheats on their taxes’
child hears reasons until join family business
understate earnings on tax bills
diff assco: osborn and west
found that 13% of sons with non-crime fathers had criminal convictions, compared with 40% of sons with crime fathers
therefore, supports DA theory, suggests that crime behaviour can be learned from intimate parent child relationships
diff assco: practical applications
three conditions needed to commit crime: necessary skills, high ratio of favourable definitions, opportunity
all conditions removed, amount of crime behaviour demonstrated should be reduced
e.g. if family is known to be criminal, any children should be removed
therefore, shows understanding of DA theory is useful
diff assco: difficult to explain smaller crimes
burglary, pickpocketing - easy to learn skills from others and find opportunity
struggles to explain violent, impulsive crimes that are often committed alone such as murder
unlikely that these crimes learned or many people have favourable definitions for them
therefore, shows that theory is limited, reduces understanding of crim behaviour