managing class actions

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:14 PM on 4/28/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

26 Terms

1
New cards

personal jurisdiction in a class action

so long as Rule 23's notice and opt-out provisions complied with there is PJ

2
New cards

is there PJ in mandatory class/classes without opt out or notice?

yes--> there is only PJ is class actions that bind known plaintiffs

3
New cards

allstate standard

For a state's law to be applied, that state "must have a significant contact or significant aggregation of contacts, creating state interests, such that choice of its law is neither arbitrary nor fundamentally unfair

4
New cards

subject matter jurisdiction

comes from 1331 federal q and 1332 diversity

5
New cards

1331 jurisdiction

if class rep pleads federal COA then the fed court has original SMJ so the case can filed here or removed here

6
New cards

1332 jurisdiction

when parties are citizens of different states + amount in controversy exceeds $75k

7
New cards

diversity in class action

only need complete diversity of named parties

8
New cards

amount in controversy req

members must independently meet AIC

no piggyback

if one member meets AIC can't aggregate claims to reach $75k

9
New cards

1367 jurisdiction

supplemental jurisdiction

if one claim can be heard in fed court then all claims can be heard

10
New cards

1367 supplemental jurisdiction literally

if one members met AIC + all named parties are diverse then other members could attach even if they didnt meet the AIC

11
New cards

1367 supplemental jurisdiction statutory

Zahn ruling persists

all members must independently meet AIC

no piggybacking

12
New cards

class action fairness act

reformed to get class actions into federal court easier

only need minimal diversity

only need one defendant to remove to get to federal court

13
New cards

local controversy exception

exception to removal to federal court under class action fairness act

keeps the case in state court

14
New cards

local controversy elements

  1. where majority of the class are citizens of forum

  2. at least 1 local defendant is significant and

  3. no other class action about this event in the last three years

15
New cards

what makes a defendant "significant"?

significant role in the litigation and significant relief sought from

16
New cards

pathways to get a class action into federal court

  1. case arises under federal law -> 1331

  2. true diversity + each plaintiff meets AIC -> 1332

  3. complete diversity of named parties + one plaintiff meets AIC -> 1332 + 1367

  4. minimal diversity + aggregate $5M damages -> 1332(d)

17
New cards

rule 23(e)

demands notice when court approves a settlement

anyone can object to the settlement

the form of notice is at the court's discretion

18
New cards

rule 23(c)

permits notice to be given when a class is certified

requires notice to a damages class + opt out info

19
New cards

court approval of settlement requirement

settlement must be fair, reasonable, and adequate

20
New cards

why does court have to approve a class action settlement?

because the class isn't representing itself in requesting the settlement agreement or amount

acts as a safeguard against the inherent conflict of interest between counsel, payment, and good representation

21
New cards

how does a court approve a settlemt?

  1. fairness hearing that there is a mutual interest not to litigate

  2. Reed reasonableness factors to ensure settlement is in the best interest

22
New cards

reed factors

  1. existence of fraud/collusion

  2. complexity, expense, and likely duration of litigation if no settlement

  3. stage of proceedings + amount of discovery completed

  4. probability of plaintiff's success on merits

  5. range of possible recovery

  6. opinions of class counsel, class reps, and absent members

23
New cards

the two most important Reed reasonableness factors

probability of plaintiffs success on merits and range of possible recovery

24
New cards

cy pres + fluid recoveries

when giving money to the class is not practically feasible because finding the missing class is too difficult or the small recovery to plaintiffs would be consumed by administrative costs

25
New cards

cy pres relief

using funds to pay for something that offers some potential benefit to the class

such as building a park near affected class or teaching similarly situated groups

26
New cards

fluid recovery

distributing the funds to the class through a market system

like coupons or rebates