1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are intrinsic aids
Found within acts of parliament
Headings
Long title
Interpretation sections
Short title
Explanatory notes
Schedules
Preamble (comprehensive long title)
What are the rules of language
General rule
Specific rule
Context rule
What is the general rule
Where there is a list of words followed by general words, the general words include other things of the same kind as those on the list
‘Words of the same kind’
Case example for the general rule
Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse - “or other place” (betting act 1853) referred to bets taken in indoor spaces
D was not liable - Took bets in an open air enclosure
What is the specific rule
The express mention of one thing excludes another
Case example for the specific rule
R v Inhabitants of Sedgley - D didnt have to pay tax on his limestone mine as the express mention of coal mines excluded other types of mines
What is the context rule
The word is known by the company it keeps
(The meaning of the word can be known from the words around it i.e the context)
Case example for the context rule
Muir v Keay - entertainment included other forms of enjoyment (such as drinking coffee late at night)
D required a licence & committed an offence
Advantages of intrinsic aids
Easy to use, as the judge only needs to look at the statute itself
Quicker, saves time & money compared to extrinsic aids
Upholds sovereignty by considering only what was enacted
Disadvantages of intrinsic aids
May not provide the judge with a solution, particularly if parliaments true intention was not obvious
Acts before 1999 do not contain explanatory notes
What are extrinsic aids
Found outside the act of parliament
Hansard - record of everything said in parliament
Law commission reports
Academic textbooks & articles
International treaties
Oxford English Dictionary - from the year the relevant act was passed
What was stated in the decision of Pepper v Hart
Hansard should only be used where:
The words of the act are ambiguous, unclear, or absurd
The statements in Hansard are clear
The statement in Hansard is made by the Minster responsible for the bill
Advantages of extrinsic aids
Give a more comprehensive view of parliaments intention
Allow judges to consult a greater range of material than intrinsic aids
Lord Denning in Davis v Johnson - to ignore Hansard would be “to grope in the dark for the meaning of an act without switching on the light”
Disadvantages of extrinsic aids
Conflicts with sovereignty - allows judges to place their own interpretation on the words used by parliament, rather than sticking to their ordinary meaning
Lengthy & costly process
Lord Scarman - the use of Hansard can be “unreliable” & “promote confusion” which is contrary to the rule of law (law should be ascertainable)
What is stated in s3 & s4 of the Human Rights Act 1998
Judges must read & give affect to primary & secondary legislation in a way which is compatible with the convention rights so far as it is possible to do so
If an act of parliament breaches convention rights the higher courts can declare the legislation to be incompatible
(This is an extrinsic aid)
Case example for HRA
Mendoza v Ghaidan - A14 prevents discrimination, so the Rent Acts had to be interpreted in a way which did not discriminate against the property rights of same-sex couples
What is stated in s6(3) EU Withdrawal Act 2018
Retained EU law shall be interpreted in accordance with any relevant retained case law & retained EU law principles
Case law - pre-brexit domestic courts decisions & CJEU decisions interpreting EU law