1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Leasehold covenants enforceability
Issue is whether covenants bind successors after assignment of lease or reversion
Privity of contract
Exists between original landlord and tenant → all covenants enforceable between them
Effect
Original parties remain liable under contract
Privity of estate
Exists between current landlord and current tenant → only while both hold estates
Effect
Allows enforcement of covenants that run with land
After assignment
Original parties → retain privity of contract New parties → have privity of estate only (no contract)
Problem
Need rules to balance enforceability vs fairness to successors
Old leases
Leases before 1 Jan 1996 → old rules apply
Key rule
Original landlord and tenant remain liable for full lease term
Effect
Liability continues even after assignment
Privity of estate
Allows covenants that “touch and concern” land to bind successors
Problem
Harsh on original tenant (liable long after assignment)
New leases
Leases from 1 Jan 1996 → governed by Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995
Abolition of privity of contract
Original parties not liable for entire term anymore
Tenant assignment (s5)
Automatic release of tenant on assignment. Tenant only liable while in possession
Exception
AGA or excluded assignment
Landlord assignment (s6)
No automatic release of landlord Must apply to tenant for release within 4 weeks
If refused → apply to court
Continuing liability (s23)
Party remains liable for breaches occurring during their ownership period
Transmission of covenants (s3)
Benefit and burden of all covenants pass automatically on assignment
Applies to both landlord (reversion) and tenant (lease)
Exception (s3(6))
Covenants expressed to be personal do not pass
Effect
Assignee tenant → bound by and can enforce covenants. Assignee landlord → bound by and can enforce covenants
Suing former tenant
Former tenant not liable if released under s5. If AGA given → landlord can sue former tenant as guarantor
AGA
Outgoing tenant guarantees immediate assignee’s obligations only
AGA ends when assignee assigns lease further
Landlord’s choice
Can sue current tenant (for performance) Or sue former tenant under AGA (damages only)
Indemnity
Assignee promises to reimburse outgoing tenant for losses
Purpose
Protects outgoing tenant if sued under AGA
Moule v Garrett
Common law indemnity → former tenant can recover losses from defaulting assignee
Sublease
No privity between head landlord and subtenant
Effect
Landlord cannot directly enforce covenants against subtenant
Exception (s3(5))
Restrictive covenants enforceable against occupiers (including subtenants)
Positive covenants not enforceable
Protection mechanisms
Tenant makes subtenant covenant to comply with head lease
Landlord may require direct covenant from subtenant
Forfeiture effect
If head lease forfeited → sublease also ends
Core exam rule
New leases → covenants run automatically, liability limited to period of ownership, tenant released, landlord not automatically released