1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Paragraph Focus
Para 1 = Head of State
Para 2 = Power of Patronage
Para 3 = Supreme Court
Para 1 = President
eg. May 2026, Trump hosted King Charles III for the first official state visit of his second term
this shows that the President Hold the role of Head of State by representing the US on the international stage
this allows them to shape US foreign policy and enhance their political agenda and authority on the global stage
Para 1 = PM
eg. Trumps 2025 visit to the UK, King Charles III performed the ceremonial hosting duties while PM Kier Starmer handled the political and diplomatic discussions
this shows that the PM is solely to the head of the executive
this separation limits the PMs authority to represent the country symbolically in times of crisis and in ceremonies
Comparative Theory
this can be explained by the cultural theory
US history leads it to being strongly opposed to monarchy and supportive of democracy, the Founding Fathers therefore chose an elected head of state
the separation of the 2 roles in the UK is rooted in the UK’s long history as a constitutional monarchy and popular support for the monarchy
Para 2 = President
eg. Sept 2025, Keir Starmer carried out major cabinet reshuffle as he announced ‘phase 2’ of his government, including appointing allies such as David Lammy to Deputy Prime Minister
this shows that the PM wields the power of patronage, allowing them to appoint and dismiss members of Cabinet
this means the PM is able to shape the executive to ensure loyalty and keep backbenchers in check if they want to serve in government one day
Para 2 = PM
eg. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski tanked Trump’s SAVE America Act (“026) by failing to support it, du to the fact that many voter in rural Alaska rely on mail in ballots
this shows that the President does not have power of patronage which enables them to control their party members in Congress
this means that President has to rely on Congress to pass their agenda which can be hard as members are incentivised to represent their constituents in order to be re-elected
Para 3 = President
eg. President Trump appointed 3 conservative SCOTUS justices such as Neil Gorsuch during his first term, which created a strong 6-3 conservative majority and led to rules such as Dobbs vs Jackson Health Organisation
this shows that the President has the power to nominate justices to the supreme court
this allows the President to shape the judicial branch to their ideological compatibility and influence the interpretation of the constitution
Para 3 = PM
since the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, judicial appointments are made by an independent Judicial Appointments Commission
this shows that the PM does not have power over appointments to the supreme court
this ensures the court is independent and neutral so the PM has no influence of judicial rulings