Mod. 4 Choosing Projects & Investment Decision Rules

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:47 AM on 5/20/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

20 Terms

1
New cards

mutually exclusive projects

  • when you must choose only one project among several possible projects

  • NPV rule: select the project with the highest NPV

  • IRR rule: selecting the project with the highest IRR may lead to mistakes

2
New cards

Net Present Value (NPV)

rule: take the project with the highest NPV

PV benefits - PV costs =

NPV rule: net profit created by project, is a $ (dollar) amount

3
New cards

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

NPV = 0 → PV benefits - PV costs

  • take any investment where this exceeds the cost of capital

  • turn down any investment where this is less than the cost of capital

  • is a % return on the project (% at full recovery of the project based on spending)

4
New cards

payback rule

the sense of time, how long it takes to recover from all the costs of the project

  • ranges from short term to a few decades

  • amount of time it takes to recover or pay back the initial investment.

•If the payback period is less than a pre-specified length of time, you accept the project.

•Otherwise, you reject the project.

•The payback rule is used by many companies because of its simplicity.

5
New cards

Perpetual Project

  • if the project lasts forever, how to solve?

  • CANNOT use financial calculator

  • need to use PV of a perpetuity: C / r

NPV = (Cash flow / return) - cost of project (the PV)

  • NPV is dependent on the discount rate (cost of capital)

6
New cards

NPV v. IRR rules

• The IRR Investment Rule will give the same answer as the NPV rule

in many, but not all situations.

• In general, the IRR rule works for a stand-alone project if all of the

project’s negative cash flows precede its positive cash flows.

• In other cases, the IRR rule may disagree with the NPV rule and

thus be incorrect.

• Situations where the IRR rule and NPV rule may be in conflict:

• Delayed Investments

• Nonexistent IRR

• Multiple IRRs

7
New cards

Project Choice

  • take when r < IRR and NPV > 0

  • Reject project when r > IRR and NPV < 0

<ul><li><p>take when r &lt; IRR and NPV &gt; 0</p></li><li><p>Reject project when r &gt; IRR and NPV &lt; 0</p></li></ul><p></p>
8
New cards

Delayed Investments (example)

•Assume you have just retired as the C E O of a successful company. A major publisher has offered you a book deal. The publisher will pay you $1 million upfront if you agree to write a book about your experiences. You estimate that it will take three years to write the book. The time you spend writing will cause you to give up speaking engagements amounting to $500,000 per year. You estimate your opportunity cost to be 10%.

  • Pitfall #1 of IRR

<p><span>•Assume you have just retired as the C E O of a successful company. A major publisher has offered you a book deal. The publisher will pay you $1 million upfront if you agree to write a book about your experiences. You estimate that it will take three years to write the book. The time you spend writing will cause you to give up speaking engagements amounting to $500,000 per year. You estimate your opportunity cost to be 10%.</span></p><ul><li><p>Pitfall #1 of IRR</p></li></ul><p></p>
9
New cards

Multiple IRR’s (example)

•Suppose Star informs the publisher that it needs to sweeten the deal before he will accept it. The publisher offers $550,000 advance and $1,000,000 in four years when the book is published.

•Should he accept or reject the new offer?

pattern: +, -, -, -, + (has a sign change twice)

  • pitfall #2 of IRR

<p>•Suppose Star informs the publisher that it needs to sweeten the deal before he will accept it. The publisher offers $550,000 advance and $1,000,000 in four years when the book is published.</p><p>•Should he accept or reject the new offer?</p><p>pattern: +, -, -, -, + (has a sign change twice)</p><ul><li><p>pitfall #2 of IRR</p></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

Noneexistent IRR

•Finally, Star is able to get the publisher to increase his advance to $750,000, in addition to the $1 million when the book is published in four years.

•No I R R exists.

  • Pitfall #3 of IRR

<p><span>•Finally, Star is able to get the publisher to increase his advance to $750,000, in addition to the $1 million when the book is published in four years.</span></p><p><span>•No I R R exists.</span></p><ul><li><p>Pitfall #3 of IRR</p></li></ul><p></p>
11
New cards

Project Choice Notes

  • When NPV and IRR disagree, always follow NPV

  • There is a disagreement due to upward curve (opposing recommendations)

  • shape of the curve decides whether NPV or IRR gives the same or opposing answers

  • cash flows impact the shape of the curve

12
New cards

option A

A: cost is first, then benefits after

B: cash flow changes twice, U-shape = multiple IRR’s

C: cash flows change, + early on, - after = delayed investment

D: Cash flows change twice nonexistent IRR (only seen when graphed)

<p>A: cost is first, then benefits after</p><p>B: cash flow changes twice, U-shape = multiple IRR’s</p><p>C: cash flows change, + early on, - after = delayed investment</p><p>D: Cash flows change twice nonexistent IRR (only seen when graphed)</p><p></p>
13
New cards

Paybacks strengths and weaknesses

•Strengths:

•Provides an indication of a project’s risk and liquidity.

•Easy to calculate and understand.

•Weaknesses:

•Ignores the TVM.

•Ignores CFs occurring after the payback period.

•No specification of acceptable payback.

requires using discounted CF’s = find the PV of each cash flow then do the method

<p><span>•Strengths:</span></p><p><span>•Provides an indication of a project’s risk and liquidity.</span></p><p><span>•Easy to calculate and understand.</span></p><p></p><p><span>•Weaknesses:</span></p><p><span>•Ignores the TVM.</span></p><p><span>•Ignores CFs occurring after the payback period.</span></p><p><span>•No specification of acceptable payback.</span></p><p></p><p><span>requires using discounted CF’s = find the PV of each cash flow then do the method</span></p>
14
New cards

time value of money (requires finding discounted CF’s)

what does the payback rule violate?

15
New cards

Mutually Exclusive Projects

•When you must choose only one project among several possible projects, the choice is mutually exclusive.

•N P V Rule: pick the highest

•Select the project with the highest N P V

•I R R Rule: may lead to mistakes in choice

•Selecting the project with the highest I R R may lead to mistakes

16
New cards

IRR difference from NPV

  1. Scale of investment

  2. timing of cash flows

  3. riskiness

17
New cards

Difference in Scale

•If a project’s size is doubled, its N P V will double. This is not the case with IRR.

•Thus, the IRR rule cannot be used to compare projects of different scales.

<p>•If a project’s size is doubled, its N P V will double. This is not the case with IRR.</p><p>•Thus, the IRR rule cannot be used to compare projects of different scales.</p><p></p>
18
New cards

Timing of Cash flows

•the IRR can be affected by changing the timing of the cash flows, even when the scale is the same.

<p>•the IRR can be affected by changing the timing of the cash flows, even when the scale is the same.</p><p></p>
19
New cards

Difference in Risk

•not affected by the cost of capital (risk) while NPV is sensitive to the risk.

<p><span>•not affected by the cost of capital (risk) while NPV is sensitive to the risk.</span></p><p></p>
20
New cards

Profitability index

can be used to identify the optimal combination of projects to undertake

  • measures bank for buck

  • warning: multiple resource constraints, can be broken down completely

  • have to pay attention to the cost constraints of choosing a project