1/87
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Post Hoc Tests
tell us which groups differ from the rest
Scheffe Test
post hoc test
comparing all pairs of two means when the sample sizes are unequal
equal or unequal sample sizes
Tukey Test
post hoc test
comparing all pairs of two means when the sample sizes are equal
equal sample sizes
What is the symbol for the Tukey test?
q
Bonferroni Test
post hoc test
probably the simplest but most conservative
least likely to make a type 1 error
What type of data is used for a histogram?
used to visualize the distribution of continuous, numerical, or quantitative data
Main difference between standard deviation graph, positively skewed graph, and negatively skewed graph?
the shape of the graph
Standard deviation graph
normal distribution
symmetrical shape: mean, median, mode are all the same
data is spread evenly on both sides
positively skewed graph
skewed to the right
tail stretches to the right
most data is on the left
example of a positively skewed graph
income distribution (a few people earn very high incomes)
Negatively skewed graph
skewed to the left
tail stretches to the left
most data is on the right
example of negatively skewed graph
easy test scores (most people score high, few score low)
What is the empirical rule?
68-95-99.7
tells you how the data is being spread around the mean
normal distributions (bell-shaped curve)
How much data falls within one standard deviation of the mean?
68%
How much data falls within two standard deviations of the mean?
95%
How much data falls within 3 standard deviations of the mean?
99.7%
What is the symbol of correlation coefficient?
r
What does the correlation coefficient tell you?
direction (positive or negative)
strength (how strong the relationship is)
r value of a positive correlation
r>0 as one variable increases, the other increases
r value of negative correlation
r<0 as one variable increases, the other decreases
what does an r value of 0 mean?
no correlation
for strength, what does an r value close to 1 mean?
strong correlation
does correlation mean causation?
NO
definition of statistical power?
probability that a test correctly detects a real effect (rejects the null hypothesis)
if a study has 80% power what does that mean?
80% chance you’ll detect a true effect and a 20% chance you’ll miss it
when to not use a parametric test
data is not normally distributed (skewed)
small sample size
data is ordinal (ranked)
extreme outliers
data is categorical
what nonparametric test should you use when comparing two independent groups?
mann-whitney U test
what nonparametric test should you use when comparing two paired groups?
wilcoxon sign-rank test
what nonparametric test should you use when comparing three plus independent groups?
kruskal-wallis test
what nonparametric test should you use when comparing three plus paired groups?
friedman test
what nonparametric test should you use when looking at relationships between groups?
spearman rank correlation
what are nonparametric tests?
they use rank, are more flexible, and slightly less powerful
odds and risk ratio of 1
no difference between groups
odds and risk ratio >1
increased risk/odds
odds and risk ratio <1
decreased risk/odds
if a 95% confidence interval includes 1…
its not statsically significant
if a 95% confidence interval does NOT include 1…
its statistically significant
relative risk of 1.5 and confidence interval of 1.2-1.8
50% higher risk
statically significant
selection bias
groups being compared are not truly similar at baseline (healthier people are more likely to enroll in study)
sampling bias
your sample does not represent the population (only surveying college students for general population health)
recall bias
people don’t accurately remember past events (sick patients remember exposures more than healthy controls)
observer bias
researcher’s exceptions influence results (researchers subconsciously rate treatment groups better)
interviewer bias
asking questions differently between groups
response bias
participants give inaccurate answers (underreporting alcohol use)
attrition bias
people drop out and it affects results (sicker patients leave the study)
confounding bias
a third variable distorts the relationship (coffee appears linked to lung cancer, but smoking is the real cause)
publication bias
positive results are more likely to be published
lead-time bias
early detection makes survival time look longer without changing outcome
length-time bias
screening detects slow, less aggressive disease
categorical (qualitative) data
data that falls into groups or categories
examples of categorical data
blood type, gender, yes/no outcomes, injury type
continuous (quanitative) data
data that is numerical and measurable, answers how much or how many
examples of continuous data
height, weight, BP, time
nominal data
in name only, most primitive, categorical and qualitative, cannot add, subtract, multiply divide
examples of nominal data
heart rate, nm wavelength, height, weight, cost, distance, age, salaries
advantages of a cross over study
each person is their own control which (reduces differences)
small sample size
more statical power
efficient comparison of treatments
disadvantages of cross over study
carryover effects
not suitable for all conditions
washout periods could be issue
time related effects
dropouts
what is the intention to treat analysis?
when you analyze participants in the groups they were originally assigned to, regardless of what actually happened later
how to use intention to treat analysis?
if someone stops treatment, switches groups, or doesn’t follow protocol, you still have to analyze them as if they stayed in their original group
number to treat equation
1 patient to benefit
1/control event rate-experimental event rate
number to harm
1 patient harmed
1/experimental event rate- control event rate
why would you want to do a meta-analysis?
to combine results from multiple studies addressing the same question to get a stronger and more reliable conclusion
reasons to do a meta-analysis
increases statistical power
improves precision
resolves conflicting results
generalizability
identifies patterns or subgroups
foundation for evidence-based medicine
sensitivity
measures a test’s ability to correctly identify people who have the disease
specificity
measures a test’s ability to correctly identify people who do NOT have the disease
when do you use a randomized control trial?
studying a treatment, medication, or intervention
its ethical and feasible
you want the strongest evidence for efficacy
when do you use a case control study?
disease is rare
disease takes a long time to develop
you want to study possible risk factors
when to use a retrospective cohort study?
exposure is rare
data already exists
randomization would be unethical
requirements for data to be parametric
normal distribution
continuous data
equal variance
independence of observations
absence of outliers
what does the P in PICOT stand for?
participants/population
what does the I in PICOT stand for?
intervention/indication
what does the C in PICOT stand for?
comparator/control
what does the O in PICOT stand for?
outcome
what does the T in PICOT stand for?
time frame
in studies with very small numbers, what is the best type of test to use categorical or continuous?
categorical (nonparametric) because they make fewer assumptions about the data distribution
what is ratio data?
data that has a true zero
r value of -0.66 would represent what?
a strong negative correlation
mean
average
median
middle number
mode
most frequency occurring number in data set
what is different about the variance equation for population vs sample
population: divide by N
sample: divide by N-1
how to find the standard deviation?
square root of variance
when to use z score?
population and you know standard deviation
when to use t score?
standard deviation is unknown and small sample
How to find E for chi squared?
population percentage multiplied by sample size
z score for 90% CI
1.65
z score for 95% CI
1.96
z score for 99% CI
2.58