1/60
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is the Sabathé (limited pressure) cycle? How does it compare to the Beau de Rochas (Otto) and Diesel cycles, and what is its specific interest? - [slide 21 CM1]
The Sabathé cycle, combines the features of the Otto (constant volume heat add) and Diesel cycles (constant pressure heat addition).
Heat is added sequentially: first at a constant volume (like an Otto; premix burn), and then at a constant pressure (like a Diesel cycle).
Its specific interest is that it more accurately models the actual pressure-volume evolution of a real internal combustion engine.
While the Otto cycle is theoretically the most efficient for a fixed compression ratio, real engines are structurally limited by their maximum peak pressure. If peak pressure is the limiting constraint, the Sabathé or Diesel cycle actually offers the best efficiency.
What is the interest and functioning principle of an Argon engine? Why do we want to increase the gamma value, and why does this require a low compression ratio?
Why do the compression ratio and the specific heat ratio (gamma) increase the thermodynamic efficiency? Provide a physical explanation. - [slide 13-14-15 CM1]
Higher compression ratio
higher pressure at the start of combustion -> higher peak combustion temperature T_max -> Carnot principle :a larger temperature gradient across the cycle = a higher theoretical conversion of heat to work
expansion stroke starts at this much higher pressure and a smaller volume -> hot gases have a much longer physical distance to push down on the piston
Higher specific heat ratio
Lower C_v means physically less energy is trapped as internal energy -> Higher ΔT during combustion leads to higher peak pressures, which allows the gas to do more work during expansion for the same amount of fuel energy.

How does the equivalence ratio (and thus the temperature) influence the thermodynamic efficiency of an engine?
The thermodynamic efficiency n_th = W / Q_in of an engine is governed by two primary factors: the intrinsic behavior and the extrinsic management of heat.
1. Intrinsic: Specific Heat Ratio γ
- Lower ϕ (leaner) results in a higher concentration of air
- and air has higher γ (compared to combustion products)
- Higher γ -> lower C_v -> higher ΔT for a given heat input -> higher expansion pressure -> higher conversion of heat to work.
2. Extrinsic: Heat Loss
- Heat transfer from the gas to the cylinder walls
- Lower ϕ (leaner) -> lower average combustion temperature -> smaller ΔT heat loss gradient = less leakage through walls (more fraction Q_in for work)
3. Peak Pressure
- Lower T also means lower pressure, weaker explasion force, and thus less work per cycle
Conclusion: Efficiency increases as ϕ decreases because the cycle benefits from a more favorable working fluid γ and lower external heat loss Q_loss
=> trade-off in engine design: running lean gives you great efficiency, but terrible peak power (IMEP)
How does the equivalence ratio mathematically and physically influence the Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (IMEP)? [CM4 slide 6 + extra]
What does the Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (IMEP) represent, is it a "true" physically measurable pressure, and what parameters influence it? [slide 29 CM2]
What are the origins, orders of magnitude, and influencing parameters of wall heat losses? - [page 7 CM3]
What is the origin of radiation in a diesel engine? What would be the effect on the engine's efficiency if we assumed the walls were perfectly adiabatic? - [ ?? ]
Is it physically possible to completely insulate a cylinder to eliminate wall heat losses, and what are the material challenges involved? [page 11 CM3]
What is the physical meaning of the exhaust temperature (T5) compared to the end-of-expansion temperature (T4)? How do you calculate T5 from T4? - [slide 9 CM4 + extra]
What is a turbocharger, and what is its utility in an engine? - [slide 21 / page 6 CM4]
Turbocharger
A turbocharger consists of a compressor and a turbine coupled together on a single shaft.
Instead of letting the hot, high-pressure exhaust gases escape and waste their energy, the exhaust gases go through a turbine to spin it. This spins the compressor, which forces fresh air into the intake manifold.
Utility :
primary goal = increase the mass and density of air trapped in the cylinde (more air = more work)
packing more air in same volume (same engine size) = you can inject more fuel (for same ϕ) = increases the engine's power (IMEP)
What are the specific advantages of supercharging? Explain how Variable Turbine Geometry (VTG) and electric assistance improve this process. - [slide 21 / page 7 CM4]
Turbocharger and Supercharger both pack more air into cylinder via compressor. Turbocharger via exhaust gases in turbine that spins a compressor, Supercharger directly via crankshaft that spins a compressor.
physical advantage = no "turbo lag" (response time due to inertia of turbo for large turbos / at low rpm). Supercharger mechanically linked to the engine speed, so it provides an immediate boost (even at low rpm)
it’s important to mention that we design oversized turbochargers and use regulation (like VTG) to provide safe boost at lower rpm and bypasses exhaust gas around the turbine at higher rpm (with wastegate).
Variable Turbine Geometry (VTG) :
at low rpm (exhaust flow to weak), VTG adapts the incoming air flow (by narrowing the valve, exhaust flow accelerates and hits turbine blades with high velocity)
at high rpm (turbo can’t spin past it’s rpm limit / chocking risk) : the vane opens
engine computer physically changes the angle of these vanes to optimize the velocity and angle of the exhaust gases hitting the turbine blades
Electric Assistance:
At low RPMs or light loads = not enough exhaust energy spin a large turbocharger, so we add an electric motor directly to the compressor shaft (no more turbo lag / instant boost)
Which system is better for cylinder filling: a turbocharger or a mechanically driven supercharger?
A turbocharger is better for thermodynamic efficiency because it reuses normally wasted exhaust gas energy to compress the intake air and increase cylinder filling
but turbolag (response time due to inertia of turbo for large turbos / at low rpm)
systems like Variable Turbine Geometry (VTG) or Electric Assistance solve turbolag (but cost)
A supercharger uses mechanical power directly from the engine's crankshaft to increase cylinder filling (
= steals a part of usefull work → penalizes engine's overall efficiency
more reactive and provides high torque instantly (no turbo lag, even at low rpm)
What are the main sources and types of mechanical friction in an engine? - [slide 6-7 + graph on 10 CM5 + extra]
mechanical friction sources :
up to 75% : (majority) comes from the piston assembly (the rings scraping the cylinder and the skirt slapping the walls)
journal bearings (crankshaft and camshaft)
valve train (open/close engine valves) : only limited fraction of mechanical friction
auiliarie frictions (oil pump, water pump; scanvenge pumps,…)
different friction regimes :
thick film of pressurized oil completely separates the moving metal parts
occurs in the journal bearings and the piston skirt during the middle of the stroke
lineraly dependant on engin speed : the faster the engin speed = the more fluid shears
fmep (friction mean effective pressure) ~100…200 kPa
In terms of engine parts :
fmep_s : Piston ring friction (boundary friction, +-contant) ~50…100 kPa
fmep_p : Piston skirt friction (hydrodynamic friction, speed + B dependant) ~ 10…30 kPa
fmep_n : Journal bearing friction (speed + aspect design S/B dependant) ~ 10…30 kPa
in terms of physical contributions :
fmep_0 : constant elastic ring pre-tension, valve-train, …
load dependant term = proportional to gas pressure
speed dependant term = mean piston speed ( u/B)
Why do the Friction Mean Effective Pressure (FMEP) curves have a slight squared component as a function of engine speed, rather than being purely linear? - [slide 25 CM5]
Pure mechanical friction (rings, bearings) relies heavily on hydrodynamic oil shear, which increases mostly linearly with engine speed u
in some experimental settings (as it is difficult to isolate every individual loss) : FMEP_tot = FMEP + PMEP + AMEP (accessories).
the work required to pump gas into and out of the cylinder ("pumping of gas above the piston") is fundamentally excluded from pure mechanical FMEP (??)
PMEP = work required to pump air into and out of the engine → forcing gases past narrow valves = pressure drop (∝v² fluid velocity) → piston speed u∝ v ⇒ pressure drop ∝u² (Pumping work increases quadratically with rpm)
mechanically driven accessories like the water pump require torque that scales quadratically with rpm
windage = aerodynamic drag inside the crankcase (crankshaft generates turbulent flow that resists motion) → ∝v² fluid velocity ⇒ ∝u² piston speed
Why is it preferable to operate an engine at high load rather than part load, and how do downsizing and supercharging help achieve this? - [slide 30 CM5]
Downsizing = replace a large engine with a smaller one to drastically reduce mechanical friction and pumping losses
rappel - fmep physical contributions :
fmep_0 : constant elastic ring pre-tension, valve-train, …
load dependant term = proportional to gas pressure
speed dependant term = mean piston speed ( u/B)
running smaller engine at higher relative load (α = current power / max power) = reduces relativly the punitive effect of fmep_0
BUT !! maller displacement naturally = less power, so supercharging (or turbocharging) becomes indispensable → more air = allows to burn more fuel = higher IMEP
also reduces puming losses : the turbocharged engine operates closer to ambient intake pressure → for SI running at a higher load = throttle valve is kept wider open = eliminates wasteful pumping losses
combination maintains the vehicle's high power output while significantly cutting fuel consumption and CO2 emissions
What are the origins of the mechanical loads in a single-cylinder engine? - [slide 5 + extra CM6]
Gas Pressure (The Engine Cycle) :
during combustion, expanding gases exert a massive force pushing down on the piston and simultaneously pushing up on the cylinder head (naturally cancel each other out = internally balanced)
force is transmitted to bearing → crankshaft
pressure = generates the useful torque on the crankshaft
Inertia (Acceleration of Parts):
piston and connecting rod violently change direction and speed at the top and bottom of every stroke = inertia
inertial loads = vertical (oscillating) + rotational components
inertial loads ∝ rpm
not internally balanced → forces are transmitted directly to the engine mounts ⇒ cause the engine to vibrate
these sources change throughout engine cycle (time dependant) and introduce pitch / roll / yaw on engine block and crankshaft
How can you avoid or balance these mechanical loads in a multi-cylinder engine? - [slide 38 CM6]
Why is the Lanchester balancer used to compensate for second-order forces and not first-order forces? - [extra slide 26 + 38 CM6]
How do you justify the firing order of cylinders in a multi-cylinder engine, and is a perfectly regular firing order always possible?
What aerodynamic and geometric parameters dictate the dimensions of the intake and exhaust valves? - [slide 19 CM7]
at high rpm, if the flow accelerates past the speed of sound c, it chockes = cilinder cannot be filled, backward flow, vibrations,…
dimensionless number Mach index (Z ) is the ratio = (engine’s piston speed) / (speed of sound of air though valve)
To maintain good volumetric efficiency, we aim to keep the Mach index below Z < 0.6
Aerodynamic Parameters (c and T)
The local speed of sound c in a gas is dependant on its temperature
the speed of sound in cold intake air << speed on sound in hot exhaust gases (= cold intake air is much closer to chocking) ⇒ intake flow area must be larger than the exhaust flow area
the exhaust-to-intake area ratio is typically 70% to 80%
Geometric Parameters (u and B)
Because the piston speed u increases with rpm, to keep Z < 0.6 → need to increase valve “average opening area A” at higher rpm
this is why high performance engine cylinders use 4+ valves!
we also angle valves in a "pent-roof" shape to maximize the available surface area
Because the volume of gas that must be moved in and out of the engine ∝ B², the required valve area must also scale up proportionally ↔ the physical space available to fit these valves is strictly limited by the exact same bore diameter
When is it useful to open and close the different valves during the cycle, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of valve timing advances and delays? - [slide 31 + extra CM7]
Valve timing is highly dependent on engine speed (RPM) and load. We advance or delay valve openings and closings to balance volumetric efficiency, expansion work, and internal exhaust gas recirculation (EGR).
Intake
Opening
Early : air has longer time window to mix homogeneously
Late : at high rpm = more work to cleat out cylinder ; at low rpm = reduces internal EGR (stable combustion)
Closing = Has the largest impact on volumetric efficiency
Early : for low rpm = traps air perfectly ; at partial loads = replaces needs for throttle valve to regulate engine power (cuts pumping losses)
Late : at high rpm = packs extra air into cylinder ; at low rpm = fresh mixture flows backwards out
Exhaust
Opening
Early : at low rpm = waist high pressure energy (expansion work) ; at high rpm = MUST open early or huge back-pressure en puming losses
Late : at low rpm = extract maximum to expansion stroke ; at high rpm = puming losses
Closing
Early : at low rpm = imporved heating and evaporation of fresh mixture (high EGR) ; at high rpm = requieres more puming work to push exhaust out
Late : at high rpm = improved suction of fresh intake air (vacuum effet) ; at low rpm = sucks exhaust gas back into cylinder (EGR)
modern engines physically adapt these timings on the fly (Variable Valve Timing (VVT) )
What is the interest and principle of Variable Valve Timing (VVT) or a 3D variable camshaft? - [slide 33 CM7]
What parameters directly influence the volumetric efficiency (cylinder filling) in a 4-stroke engine? - [slide 35 CM7]
How does the scavenging/filling process work in a 2-stroke engine, and what are the specific problems linked to it?- [slide 45 + extra CM7]
Why is there a critical auto-ignition temperature for fuels, does pressure influence it, and what are its physical limits? - [slide 24-25 + extra + 15 CM8]
For the reaction to cause auto-ignition, the rate of creation (ramification) must exceed the rate of destruction (termination)
As the piston compresses and heats the mixture, the rates k change non-linearly until threshold and triggers the explosion
At this exact critical temperature, the reactions that create new radicals and the reactions that consume them are perfectly balanced
temperature provides kinetic energy to break bonds and pass activation barrier E_a more easily
Pressure does influence this critical temperature, but only slightly and mostly at very low values (no impact after 10 bars = easily reached during an engine's compression stroke). More pressure = packs molecules together and increases collison frequency A
physical limits of this critical temperature
Heavy fuels (diesel) : long carbon chains easliy break and form reactive radicals = easily auto-ignite (~ 250°C)
Light fuels (gasoline) : highly stable short molecular chains = resist auto-ignition (~ 400°C - 500°C)
What are the different types of radical reactions during combustion (initiation, propagation, branching, termination), and what is the interest of studying them separately? - [slide 24 + extra CM8]
Explain the Octane and Cetane numbers, the link between them, and what chemical structures make a "good" fuel for each? - [slide 18 - CM7 + slide 45 CM9 (SI) + ]
Octane Number (SI Engines) = Measures a fuel's resistance to auto-ignition (to prevent engine knock)
from 0 (n-heptane) → 100 (iso-octane) (standard min ~50)
Good Chemical Structures: Short carbon chains, branched (ramified) chains, unsaturated compounds (double bonds), and cyclic/aromatic compounds
Cetane Number (CI Diesel Engines) = fuel’s readiness to auto-ignite (= minimizes the ignition delay)
from 0 (alpha-methylnaphthalene) → 100 (n-cetane/hexadecane)
Good Chemical Structures: Long, straight, saturated, and non-cyclic carbon chains
Link Octane/Cetane Number : Because spark-ignition engines want to prevent auto-ignition while compression-ignition engines rely on it, a high Octane number inherently dictates a low Cetane number, and vice versa (!not the same scale!)
Explain the overall combustion process and flame propagation in an SI engine. - [slide 12 CM9]
Spark Ignition process :
takes place in a +- homogeneous mixture air-fuel (≠ diesel : combustion happens AS fuel is injected)
relies on a propagating flame front that travels across the entire combustion chamber
Main phases :
Initiation (Flame Genesis) ~ 5-10% of mixture burns :
A spark (electrical discharge across the spark plug electrodes) transfers electrical energy to the fuel-air mixture
a tiny, spherical volume of hot burned gas, surrounded by unburned gases, is created = flame kernel (very vulnerable!)
the kernel survives if it reaches a critical diameter and a sufficiently high temperature (the heat flux released by combustion must = heat demanded by surrounding unburned gas to initiate flame propagation process ↔ or else the cold unburned gas absorbes heat faster than the flame can generate it, and kerne dies)
Flame Propagation ~ 5-90% of mixture burns
What parameters influence the laminar flame speed, and what is its typical value compared to actual turbulent flame speeds? - [slide 22 CM9]
Why do we usually operate SI engines at a stoichiometric equivalence ratio (ϕ = 1)? - [slide 23 CM9 + CM11]
Equivalence ratio : controls flame speed because it changes how strong and how hot the flame is (⇒ radical production+ adiabatic flame temp + reaction rate k)
Rich mixtures (ϕ>>1): too much fuel, insufficient oxygen → less radical production → less efficient heat release → slower reaction rates + reduced flame speed
Lean mixtures (ϕ << 1): too much air, insufficient fuel → lower fuel concentration and reduced radical pool → lower heat release rate and flame temperature → slower reaction rates + reduced flame speed
(SI) engines operate at a stoichiometric equivalence ratio (ϕ=1) primarily to meet strict environmental regulations :
At ϕ=1 ⇒ delicate chemical balance of a three-way catalyst is met → simultaneously neutralize the three major engine pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NOx)
Operating slightly lean (ϕ≈0.85) =
highest thermal efficiency + lowest fuel consumption
catalyst cannot effectively reduce toxic NOx in N2
Operating slightly rich (ϕ≈1.1) =
maximum engine power
not enough oxygen ⇒ surplus of unburned (unoxidized) CO and HC in the exhaust
What is engine knock, what causes it, and how can it be avoided through engine design and operating parameters? - [slide 42 CM9]
During flame propagation : the burned gases (between cylinder head and flame front) heat up and expand → act as a solid piston and compress remaining unburned gases ahead → temperature/pressure of those gases rise ⇒ burn faster (faster flame speed) BUT also increased knock tendency (auto-ignition arrives earlier)
knock = spontaneous auto-ignition of the unburned "end gas" ahead of the propagating flame front (creates violent, high-frequency pressure waves ⇒ damage the cylinder walls)
If this end gas stays above its critical auto-ignition temperature long enough before the flame reaches it, it explodes (so auto-ignition depends on temp AND on duration above that temp)
How to avoid knock :
Avoidance through Engine Design:
Chamber Geometry : small-diameter combustion chambers= small physical distance the flame must travel
Spark Placement: spark plug near the hot exhaust valves ⇒ unburned end gas is pushed into the cooler parts of the cylinder = preventing it from overheating
Turbulence: Maximizing in-cylinder turbulence (via geometries) = accelerates the flame speed
Compression Ratio: Lowering compression ratio = reduces peak cylinder temperatures and pressures = keeping the end gas cooler
Avoidance through Operating Parameters:
Spark Timing: Retarding the spark ignition timing shifts combustion slightly later into the expansion stroke, which naturally lowers the peak pressures and temperatures
EGR : exhaust gases reinjected act as a thermal sink → lowers the peak pressures and temperatures
Limiting turbocharger boost : lowers the peak pressures and temperatures
Fuel : high-octane fuels = better resistance to auto-ignition
Why are SI engines typically designed to be compact (small cylinder diameters)? - [slide 50 CM9]
What are the main differences, advantages, and disadvantages of Port Fuel Injection (PFI) versus Direct Injection Spark Ignition (DISI)? - [slide 65- CM9]
In SI engines, the way fuel is introduced controls : mixture formation, combustion quality, and efficiency → different injection strategies exist
PFI (Port Fuel Injection):
= fuel is sprayed into the intake port (just before intake valve), and there it mixes with incoming fresh air
DISI (Direct Injection Spark Ignition):
= fuel is sprayed directly into the combustion chamber
Advantages
injecting liq fuel on metal cylinder → fuel vaporizes by absorbing heat = cooling effect ⇒ lower peak temperatures = improves knock resistance + (at high loads) intake air less heated, more dense, more air can be packed, so better volumetric efficiency
at low loads, SI engine with DI can operate “unthrottled” = cuts pumping losses (engine output is controlled by fuel (late) injection instead of a throttle valve = “stratified charge”, ignitable cloud concentrated at sparkplug)
heat losses : concentrating the combustion in the center of the chamber limits heat transfer losses to the cylinder walls
Disadvantages
Increased Pollution: fuel has less time to mix with the air → increased emissions (production of ultra-fine particulate matter (soot), + higher levels of unburned hydrocarbons and NOx)
What is the specific interest of using a stratified charge in an SI engine? - [slide 67-69 CM9]
and excess air → air acts as insulation from cylinder walls = reduces heat losses
What is the utility and functioning principle of a pre-chamber, particularly in stationary gas engines? - [slide 78 CM9]
Explain the chemical and physical evaporation process of a fuel droplet in a CI engine. - [slide 15 CM10]
The liquid droplet turns into vapor (phase change = temperature remains constant).
As the fuel vaporizes,vapor expands away from drolet and mixes with the surrounding air.
After evaporation is complete, the fuel vapor temperature continues to rise.
Chemical Process (Diffusion and Radical Proliferation)
once temperature is high enough (exceeds the fuel's auto-ignition temperature) → fuel molecules start breaking down
!! not strictly sequential → The chemical delay begins the moment the first fuel vapors appear, meaning it actively overlaps with the ongoing physical evaporation of the liquid droplet
chemical delay = time it takes for these radicals to multiply and reach a critical concentration necessary to trigger self-sustaining combustion.
physical delay = time required for jet penetration, droplet formation, heating, and evaporation
What is the interest of inducing swirl or tumble flows in the cylinder? - [slide 16 CM10 + slide 22 CM9]
to speed up evaporation and mixing, we force air intake into a swirl (rotation around the cylinder axis) + tumble (rotation perpendicular to the axis)
Diesel (CI) engines:
Swirl = strips vapor away from liq fuel droplets as they evaporate, and mix it with air
improves mixing and prevents the liquid fuel from wetting (= liquid fuel doesn’t evaporate) cylinder walls (especially critical in small-bore engines)
Spark Ignition (SI) engines:
To avoid knock we use turbulence: Maximizing in-cylinder turbulence (via geometries) = accelerates the flame speed (eddies distort flame front = increase total surface area = consume the unburned gas faster + higher apparent flame speed)
BUT generating these flow patterns comes at the cost of : reducing vol. efficiency + convective heat losses to cylinder walls
Why do CI engines typically produce more torque than SI engines? - [slide 30 + 32 CM10]
What specific pollutants are emitted by gasoline and diesel engines, and what are their respective formation mechanisms? - [slide 16 + 25 - CM11]
Carbone Monoxide (CO) :
operating at a rich equivalence ratio = lack of oxygen to fully oxidize CO into CO2
SI engines operate near a stoichiometric ratio (ϕ≈1; for 3 way catalyst) → they produce high levels of CO (~70 % pollutant emissions for SI) + CO formation at peak combustion temperatures (dissociation of CO2)
CI engines run lean and naturally produce much less CO (can still form during full-load operation or if the flame is quenched at partial loads)
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx):
NOx forms at high temperatures (>1800K) + and needs available oxygen to force atmospheric nitrogen to react (N2 + O → NO + N)
SI engines (NOx ~10% pollutants) : when the mixture is slightly lean (ϕ≈0.9) → high heat + spare oxygen ⇒ NOx production peaks
CI engines (NOx ~50% pollutants) : NOx forms heavily in the high-temperature diffusion flame = higher engine load → more fuel injected and burned per cycle → higher local flame temperatures → higher NOx production
Unburned Hydrocarbons (HC) :
occure when fuel doesn’t burn
SI engines (HC ~20% pollutants) : HC espaces engine because of physical imperfections in combustion chamber :
if the air-fuel mixture is forced into tight cylinder crevices where the flame cannot reach
oil layers / deposits aborbe/disolve flame
HC escapes straight out the exhaust during valve overlap
CI engines :
fuel that mixes is too lean to auto-ignite → unburned fuel
fuel too rich to burn completely before the exhaust valve opens
Particulate Matter (PM / Soot) :
Soot forms in fuel-rich zones where there isn't enough oxygen to convert carbon into CO2
CI Engines (PM ~40% pollutants) : major problem ! Core of the injected diesel jet is extremely rich (ϕ≈2…4 !)→ soot forms and are not completely oxydized→ leave through exhaust
SI engines — in modern direct injection (DISI) → liquid fuel injection reaches cylinder walls (wall wetting) → formation of liquid fuel films = locally rich zones during combustion → incomplete oxidation→ soot formation
Explain the principle of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR). Under what conditions is it used, and what is the main difference between its application in SI and CI engines? - [slide 59 CM11]
Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) = replace a part of intake charge with exhaust gas, to mix with the fresh fuel-air charge. Because the exhaust gases injected have a high heat capacity, it aborbs heat (thermal sink) → lowers the peak combustion temperatures → NO doesn’t form (NOx ↔ T>1800K)
In general : used during operating conditions where combustion temperatures are high (to control NOx)
In SI Engines
at partial load : introducing exhaust gas into the intake → lowers the peak combustion temperatures → dilutes mixture = reduces oxygen concentration (regulates engine output) → throttle valve not needed to regulate → reduces work-wasting pumping losses
adding too much inert exhaust gas → reduced oxygen concentration + lowers temp → reduces radical formation → reduces flame speed (so EGR max ~15% !)
In CI Engines :
CI do not rely on propagating flame → can tolerate much higher EGR rates (up to 50%)
CI run lean (operate with excess air) → this allows significant dilution (EGR) before flame stability and ignition delay limits are reached → and EGR prevents NOx formation
What is the difference in engine performance and emissions between diluting the intake charge with air versus diluting it with EGR? - [slide 15 + 16 CM11]
Dilution of the intake charge (either by excess air or by EGR) reduces combustion temperature ⇒ reduce pollutants + lower pumping losses ⇒ improves engine efficiency (at part load)
ERG = rreplaces part of the fresh air with inert exhaust gases, reducing oxygen concentration
Air dilution = increasing oxygen excess
Comparasion
| Performance (Efficiency) | In-Cylinder Emissions | Aftertreatment Constraints | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air dilution | +9% pure air increases γ of mixture → more heat usefull for work (not absorbed) | -40% HC and NOx air has a lower heat capacity rate than EGR (cools temp less → some NOx forms) | Diluting with air inherently creates a lean exhaust mixture ϕ<1 → 3-way catalytic converter doesn’t brake down NOx |
| EGR dilution | +4% exhaust gases have has a higher heat capacity → lower peak combustion temps (SI : → no throttle) | more effective at suppressing raw pollutants (-50% HC and NOx) |
emissions regulations are strict → forced to choose the EGR route to keep the catalytic converter working, sacrificing that extra 5% of potential efficiency they could have had with air dilution !
What parameters can be modified to decrease NOx emissions in both gasoline and diesel engines?
NOx forms at high temperatures (>1800K) + and needs available oxygen to force atmospheric nitrogen to react (N2 + O → NO + N)
SI Engines :
Equivalence Ratio (ϕ): Operate exactly at stoichiometry (ϕ=1) = the three-way catalytic converter can successfully neutralize the NOx.
!! avoid slightly lean mixtures (ϕ≈0.9) = worst case NOx production!!
EGR: Recirculate exhaust gas into the intake → absorbs heat → lower peak combustion temperatures. BUT in SI engines : limited to roughly 15% (flame instability)
Spark Timing: Retard the ignition timing → combustion happens later into the expansion stroke → lowers the peak pressure and temperature
For CI Engines :
EGR: (=primary control method). CI engines can tolerate massive EGR rates (up to 50% - do not rely on a fragile propagating flame front
SI) → act as a thermal sink → lower peak temperatures
compared to Direct Injection.
Explain the "trade-off" principle between maximizing engine efficiency and reducing pollutant emissions. - [slide 17 CM11]
trade-off : conditions required to maximize an engine's thermal efficiency are the exact same conditions that favor the rapid formation of pollutants (especially NOx)
Temperature Conflict :
max theoretical efficiency = need highest peak combustion temperatures → extremely hot environments = NOx formation
limit NOx = lower the compression ratio /retard the spark to cool the cylinder → decreases the engine's efficiency
Mixture Conflict :
best specific fuel consumption (highest efficiency) = operating an engine around ϕ≈0.9 → worst-case combination of high combustion temperatures and excess oxygen = NOx peak production !
Catalyst Conflict:
SI = legally has to use a three-way catalytic converter to neutralize pollutants → needs to operate at ϕ=1 ⇒ sacrifice the peak efficiency by running lean (would’ve cut pumping losses - torque is controlled by mixture, not air restriction)
How does an HCCI engine function, and how is the combustion controlled without a spark or direct injection timing? - [slide 15 CM12]
SI) : no fuel rich zones → which prevents soot
CI) : runs unthrottled → no pumping losses
CI) : no spark → lower peak combustion temperatures → low NOx
CI) : high-compression auto-ignition → high efficiency
In what specific operating region (in terms of equivalence ratio and load) does an HCCI engine work, and what limits its operation at very high or very low loads? - [slide 13 CM12]
HCCI engines operate in a narrow window :
low to medium loads
extremely lean fuel-air mixtures (ϕ = 0.28 … 0.31)
HCCI requiers specific conditions, can’t opperate at :
At high loads: more fuel must be added → raises peak cylinder temperatures → causes the mixture to auto-ignite earlier in the cycle. In HCCI the entire homogeneous mixture auto-ignites simultaneously ⇒ massive energy release = severe "volumetric knock"
At low loads: mixture too lean and cold → doesn’t auto-ignite (= engine misfires, partial combustion → unburned HC and CO emissions)
Where do the unburned hydrocarbons and CO emissions come from in an HCCI engine? - [slide 12 CM12]
Which combustion modes (SI, CI, HCCI, SPCCI, RCCI) are actually influenced by the flame propagation speed?
What is the concept and functioning principle of a double compression/double expansion (split-cycle) engine? - [slide 39 CM12]
Draw and explain the torque/speed curves for both SI and CI engines, both with and without a turbocharger.
Naturally Aspirated Engines (SI and CI)
The High-Speed Drop-Off (Right Side): As engine speed increases, the physical time to draw air into the cylinder decreases, causing a severe drop in volumetric efficiency. Simultaneously, mechanical friction and pumping losses increase quadratically with speed. These combined effects cause the torque to plummet at high RPMs for both SI and CI engines.
The Low-Speed Drop-Off (Left Side): At very low RPMs, the engine cycle takes longer to complete. This provides more time for the hot combustion gases to lose heat to the cooler cylinder walls, which lowers the indicated thermal efficiency and reduces torque.
SI vs. CI Difference: This low-speed torque drop caused by heat loss is much more pronounced in CI engines. Diesel engines operate at significantly higher compression ratios and temperatures, which drives a much steeper thermal gradient and forces more heat out through the cylinder walls compared to an SI engine.
Turbocharged Engines
Massive Torque Increase: Adding a turbocharger forces a much higher mass of fresh air into the cylinder, which drastically increases the mean effective pressure. This shifts the entire torque curve significantly higher on the graph compared to a naturally aspirated engine.
The "Steep Left Edge": If you look at a turbocharged torque curve (especially for a CI engine), the left side does not gradually curve up; it has a very steep, nearly vertical slope. This represents "turbo lag." At very low engine speeds, the exhaust gases do not have enough enthalpy to spool the turbine. Once the engine hits a critical RPM, the turbine wakes up, boost pressure builds rapidly, and the torque skyrockets
How do you justify the specific shapes and distribution of the specific fuel consumption (SFC) maps for engine load vs. speed?
SFC maps form a "bullseye" shape because fuel efficiency is optimal only in a specific middle range of engine speed and load.
Explain the spark advance map (Ignition timing vs. engine speed/load) and why spark advance must be reduced at high loads.
Spark advance maps adjust the ignition timing based on how fast the mixture is expected to burn to achieve Minimum advance for Best Torque (MBT).
How do you justify the specific shapes of the pollutant emission maps for both SI and CI engines?
Why does the maximum torque curve drop at high RPMs and at low RPMs? - [slide 32 CM10]
At low rpm / load :
SI Engine : air intake is restricted by throttle valve → pumping losses (work wasted) → less torque
CI Engine :
engine output depends on the amount of induced air (turbo has huge impact → not limited by engine knock) + high compression ratio permitted = high torque
engine power is the product of torque and speed → slower combustion process limits them to lower maximum engine speeds → CI engine must generate more torque per cycle to achieve a comparable power output at these lower speeds
At high rpm / load :
SI Engine :
mid rpm : fuel and air are already pre-mixed into a homogeneous charge, the combustion flame can propagate very quickly across the cylinder → efficiently burn fuel at much higher engine speeds = peak torque and peak power higher at higher RPM range
high rpm : maximum SI torque drops : reduced time available for cylinder filling → lowers volumetric efficiency / combustion effectiveness + friction and flow losses increase
Power (P = Tω) so even if torque begins to decrease at high RPM, the engine speed may still increase fast enough that the power continues to rise !
CI Engine : slower combustion process → liquid fuel can’t mix fast enough → if try to force more fuel in to maintain torque at high speeds = incomplete mixing, lost power, and heavy soot