1/141
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Scarce resources that must be allocated efficiently to best solve the basic economic problem
Capital, enterprise, land, and labour
Capital, enterprise, land, and labour (CELL)
The 4 factors of production
Response to the basic economic problem
Choices must be made over what to produce, how to produce, and who to produce for
What to produce in response to basic economic problem
Determined by consumer demand in a free market economy
How to produce (in response to the basic economic problem)
Chosen by businesses/firms based on what is most cost effective and profitable to minimise use of scarce resources
Determined by the income of consumers
Who to produce for in response to basic economic problem
Whether choices made have been good or bad
What does opportunity cost measure in an economy
Any point on the curve
Productive efficiency on a PPF diagram
Law of increasing opportunity cost
The more that is produced of one product, the more production of another product that has to be given up (illustrated by PPFs concave nature)
Firms improving the quality or quantity of their factors of production
How the PPF curve can be shifted outwards
Income effect and substitution effect
Explanation for the law of demand
Income effect
Causes the law of demand because the purchasing power of incomes increases as prices decrease, causing demand to extend
Substitution effect
Causes the law of demand because as prices increase, other products become more price competitive, so consumers switch their demand, causing demand to contract
Population (growth increases demand), advertising, price of substitutes, income, fashion/tastes, interest rates (mainly for expensive goods that require borrowing), price of complements
(Non price) factors that shift the demand curve (PASIFIC)
Profit motive (incentive to supply more at higher prices)
Explanation of the law of supply
Output per worker per time period
Productivity of labour
Productivity, indirect tax, number of firms in the market (more firms = more supply), technology (advancements), subsidies, weather, any other factors affecting CoP (e.g. oil prices, raw material costs etc.)
(Non price) factors that shift the supply curve (PINTS WC)
Involve costs of production (as then impacts firms willingness and ability to supply)
Trend of (non price) factors that shift supply curve
Free market
Anywhere that buyers meet suppliers to exchange goods/services FREE from government intervention
Prices and their signalling function, rationing function, and incentive function
Natural causes of the efficient allocation of scarce resources in a free market
There has been excess demand and more resources are needed
Higher prices signal to producers that (signalling function)
Decrease their output to make more profit (leave the market)
Lower prices incentivise producers to (incentive function)
Encouraging consumption of products in surplus
Lower prices ration scarce resources by (rationing function)
Consumer surplus
Area below the demand curve and above the price line
Producer surplus
Area above the supply curve and below the price line
Law of demand
Reason why PED is always negative
Steepens
Effect of supply or demand being price inelastic on their curves
Substitutes (more substitutes = more elastic), percentage of income (5% increase in apple prices = more insignificant and inelastic than 5% increase in car prices), luxury (or necessity), addictive, time period (LR = more elastic, more time to find alternatives)
Factors affecting PED (SPLAT)
Law of supply
Reason why PES is always positive
Identical
PES measurements vs PED measurements (e.g. <1 = inelastic)
Production lag, stocks, spare capacity, substitutability of factors of production, time period (LR = more elastic as in SR at least one factor of production is fixed)
Factors affecting PES (PSSST)
Substitutes
When XED is positive
Complements
When XED is negative
Relationship between 2 products increases
As XED increases
Normal good
Positive YED
Inferior good
Negative YED
YED = 0
When there is no relationship whatsoever between income and QD
Inverted (becomes supply curve)
Effect on demand curve when products are inferior goods or substitutes
Supply shifts left (S1 + tax)
Impact of indirect tax on a diagram
PED (inelastic = consumers, elastic = producers)
Who carries the greatest burden of an indirect tax between consumers depends on
Solve market failure, encourage affordability of necessities
Uses of subsidies
Supply shifts downwards (to S1 + sub, gap indicates subsidy per unit)
Impact of a subsidy on a diagram
Subsidies
Causes increased producer revenue, increased consumer surplus/savings, increased society surplus, but a deadweight welfare loss
How it is funded - opportunity cost
Benefit of subsidies for consumers depends on
Protect producers from price volatility (usually agricultural and commodities) and solve market failure
Uses of a minimum price (price floor)
QD contracts, QS extends, an excess supply (surplus) occurs (solved by intervention buying), deadweight welfare loss (to the left of equilibrium)
Impact of a minimum price on a diagram
Intervention buying
When the government buys up excess supply caused by a minimum price
Regressive, taxpayer pays for intervention buying, encourages shadow economy growth
Evaluation of minimum prices
Increase affordability of necessities, solve market failure
Uses of a maximum price (price ceiling)
QD extends, QS contracts, an excess demand (shortage) occurs, deadweight welfare loss (to the left of equilibrium)
Impact of a maximum price on a diagram
Benefit if they can access the market
Impact of a maximum price on consumers
Free market equilibrium
Where there is an efficient allocation of scarce resources
MPC (private costs) and MSC (social costs)
Externalities illustrated by the supply curve on a diagram
MPB (private benefits) and MSB (social benefits)
Externalities illustrated by the demand curve on a diagram
Maximisation of society surplus and net social benefit (MSB=MSC) (where resources perfectly follow consumer demand - D=S)
Traits of allocative efficiency (equilibrium)
Many buyers/sellers in the market, perfect information (for both producers and consumers), no barriers to entry or exit, firms are profit maximisers and consumers are utility maximisers
Allocative efficiency is the perfect way of solving the basic economic problem as long as key assumptions are made
Positive/negative externalities, merit/demerit goods, public goods, common access resources (tragedy of the commons), income inequality (inequity), monopoly power (defies many key assumptions of allocative efficiency), and factor immobility (inability of firms to meet increases in demand due to FoP)
Causes of market failure
Examples of negative externalities in production
Resource depletion/degradation, deforestation, air pollution
MSC>MPC
Negative externality in production on a diagram
MSB<MPB
Negative externality in consumption on a diagram
MSB>MPB
Positive externality in consumption on a diagram
MPC>MSC
Positive externality in production on a diagram
Always points to social optimum
Deadweight welfare loss on an externalities diagram
Self interest
Reason why firms or producers ignore externalities causing market failure
Examples of negative externalities in consumption (de-merit goods)
Smoking (3rd party inhale smoke), alcohol (3rd party = health and police services)
Examples of positive externalities in consumption (merit goods)
Healthcare (increased productivity), education (higher skills)
Examples of positive externalities in production
In-work training (more skilled labour force), R+D (technology advancements)
Imperfect information (information failure)
Main cause of merit and de-merit goods
Asymmetric information (firms withhold information on how harmful product is)
Main type of information failure causing de-merit goods
Non-excludable, non-rivalrous, non rejectable
Pure public goods traits
Firms are not incentivised to fund public goods meaning without government funding there is a missing market (complete market failure)
Impact of free rider problem
Could allow private provision to take place
Impact of quasi public goods
Eliminating non-excludability by finding ways to cost effectively price
Impact of technological advancements on public goods
Too costly and cost inefficient to exclude other producers from accessing the resource
Why there is no private ownership of common access resources
Loss of income and resources for future generations
Impact of tragedy of the commons market failure
Mass overproduction and overconsumption generating massive negative externalities in consumption in the form of resource depletion
Analysis of tragedy of the commons market failure - how it is illustrated on an externalities diagram
Information failure, cost of implementation, unintended consequences, regulatory capture
Dominant causes of government failure (ICUR)
Inaccurately valuing externalities (hard to quantify and often long term impacts)
Common cause of information gaps causing government failure
Examples of administrative costs (which can cause government failure)
Cost of subsidies, state provision, regulation of policy
Examples of unintended consequences of government intervention (causing government failure)
Growth of shadow economy/black market, impact on the poor (regressive policies), impact on firms (strict policy reducing output and hence employment)
Shifts MPC left towards the social optimum (MPC+tax, parallel if specific, not if ad valorem)
How indirect tax is used to solve market failure involving an overproduction and overconsumption
Internalises externality (polluter pays - externality accounted for in the price) allowing the price mechanism to allocate resources at QSO, eliminating overproduction and overconsumption, allocative efficiency is achieved while generating government revenue (can be reinvested into solving other market failure - hypothecated tax)
Analysis of how indirect tax solves market failure
Depends on PED (must be elastic, many goods with NEs in consumption are addictive and very price inelastic)
Main evaluation of indirect tax as a solution to market failure
Assumes government has perfect information (unrealistic), regressive, encourages shadow economy growth, paternalistic
Other evaluation of indirect tax used to solve market failure
Impact of imperfect information when governments set indirect tax
Overtaxing and undertaxing is very likely - many issues with both, especially overtaxing as it encourages shadow economy boom and puts huge pressure on firms causing unemployment and decreased output, will be extremely regressive and promote poverty. Government failure
Goods provided will likely have worse externalities (exacerbates market failure - therefore government failure), requires more policing (costly), lost tax revenue
Impact of shadow economy growth as a consequence of government intervention
Impedes consumer freedom, liberty, and choice
Impact of paternalistic government interventions
Decreases price and increases output, causing the price mechanism to allocate resources at QSO, eliminating the underconsumption and underproduction, and causing allocative efficiency and a welfare gain
Analysis of how subsidies solve market failure
Very expensive to implement (need to be evenly distributed across entire markets/industries) and may not be effective (depending on PED)
Main evaluation of subsidies as a solution to market failure
Price elastic demand (as product is underconsumed due price rather than non price factors)
Main condition for a subsidy to be effective in solving market failure
Imperfect information, subsidy dependency (from firms), subsidy may not be used to lower CoP (significant government failure)
Other evaluation of subsidies as a solution to market failure
Leaving inefficiencies unaddressed
Impact of firms becoming dependent on subsidies
Regulation
Non market based approach to solving market failure that doesn’t involve the price mechanism, and hence does not depend on PED like most other solutions and does not require a diagram
Regulation command
Bans, limits, compulsory requirements of production etc.
Incentivises economic agents to change behaviour and move quantity towards QSO, causing allocative efficiency without addressing the price mechanism
Analysis of how regulation solves market failure, if command and control are strong and effective
Very costly (mainly through control, if not affordable regulation will be useless as incentive is weak)
Main evaluation of regulation as a solution to market failure
Imperfect information (can cause regulation to be too strict causing unintended consequences such as firms leaving the market and shadow economy growth), potential for firms to cheat/bypass command, paternalistic
Other evaluation of regulation as a solution to market failure showing its significant risk of government failure
Tradable pollution permits
Innovative policy used to solve market failure caused by negative externalities in production due to air pollution. Common in developing countries to decrease emissions
Uneven burden on firms (depending on how much their industry/production relies on fossil fuels etc.)
Tradable pollution permits are a market friendly approach to solving pollution based market failure using elements of regulation, but overcoming some of the major issues of blanket regulation such as
Governments set a national pollution cap at the socially optimal level of pollution
Initial stage of tradable pollution permits - regulation (command)