1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
ISSUE:
The issue is whether the federal trial judge should certify the class under Rule 23 when ___.
UMBRELLA RULE:
A case may proceed as a class action only if (1) all four prerequisites under Rule 23(a) are satisfied and (2) the class falls under one of the three 23(b) categories.
Numerosity:
To satisfy numerosity, the class must be so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. There is no strict numerical cutoff; courts focus on practical joinder obstacles (size, geographic dispersion, identifiability, and the burden of individual suits).
Commonality:
To satisfy commonality, there must be at least one question of law or fact common to the class. The test is whether a there is a common answer that materially advances the litigation for all class members.
Typicality:
To satisfy typicality, the representative’s claims must be typical of those of the class. Typicality is met when the representative’s claim (1) arises from the same event, practice, or course of conduct and (2) is based on the same legal theory as the class, such that pursuing the representative’s claim advances the interests of the class.
Adequacy:
To satisfy adequacy, the class representative must fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. Adequacy turns on (1) whether the representative has interests aligned with the class (no conflicts) and (2) whether class counsel is qualified and able to litigate vigorously.
23(b) RULE:
Once the Rule 23(a) requirements are met, the party seeking certification must also demonstrate that the class falls within at least one Rule 23(b) category.
Rule 23(b)(1) - Multiple/Inconsistent Liabilities Class:
Under Rule 23(b)(1), a class may be certified if separate actions would: (1) create a risk of inconsistent obligations for the party opposing the class, or (2) impair or impede absent class members’ ability to protect their interests.
Rule 23(b)(2) - Injunctive/Declaratory Relief Class:
Under Rule 23(b)(2), a class may be certified when the defendant has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, such that final injunctive or declaratory relief would resolve the main issue for the class as a whole.
Rule 23(b)(3) - Damages Class:
Under Rule 23(b)(3), a class may be certified when (1) common questions of law or fact predominate over individual questions and (2) a class action is superior to other available methods of adjudication.
Predominance + Superiority Factors
IEDD (individual, extent, desirability, difficulties):
(1) the class members’ interests in individually controlling separate actions;
(2) the extent and nature of any litigation already begun by class members;
(3) the desirability of concentrating the litigation in the particular forum; and
(4) the likely difficulties in managing a class action.
[IF RULE 23(b)(1)] A Rule 23(b)(1) class is mandatory (no opt-out) and typically does not require notice.
[IF RULE 23(b)(2)] A Rule 23(b)(2) class is mandatory (no opt-out) and does not require notice; relief is primarily injunctive or declaratory, and any damages must be incidental.
[IF RULE 23(b)(3)] A Rule 23(b)(3) class requires best practicable notice to class members, requires individual notice where members can be identified, and permits opt-out; it may include monetary damages.