1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what does climate justice discourse writ large argue for
for transofmrative chnage to confront climate and inequality witrhout commodifyinf the atmosphere
ecological modernization
the idea that contradictions between capitalism and nature can be resolved by techno-managerial interventions such as the polluter pays principle and green techological innovation
downside to mobilizing capitalism to provide green equity
will benefit only a few and fails to address the precarity of the many
liberal politics of rave from which these proceduralist and distributive claims
emanate precludes a praxis based on critique and racial capitalism
what would a carbon tax do
sit within a framework that demands global north offsil fuel abolition, advocates for de-grwoth, asserts the public over the private, and offers vision of a femininst, nonracist, socialist present to be built
how does climate change make a moral appeal for a politics of relationship
calls for solidarity by white social justice groups, workers and environmental organizations with community of color organizations
how does climate justice lead activiites to focus on personal white privledge and the procedural issue of who leads
derived from a repressive understanding of power, and essentialist sense of race, and a liberal theory of change
why should we cultivate relationships with each other and the natural world
to enable co-definse as a basis from which to build solidarity, under the leadership of the frontline and prepare for a hard future
what is antiracism confired to
a focus on white people’s personal decisions yet this awareness remains largely disconnected to an agenda for societal change
shortcomings of justice movement
preference for lcoalist and NGO efforts that avoid the state and policy change
prefiguration
creation of new systems, solidarities, economies, within the old, incremental change from within, small-scale changes in practice rather than large-scale political and economic transformation
food sovereignty
local seed banks, small scale energy and irrigation systems, small-farmer cooperative and social organizations to promote both prodution and distribution, urban buyers collectives and community supported argicultural intiatives, community gardens, enhances ties between producers and consumers, promoting good working conditions and environmental stewardship, and valorizes small-scale product and traditional lifeways
seed laws
farmers are prohibited from saving and exchanging seeds, if crop is GMO or pollinated by GMO crops, saving seed is considered theft of intellectual property, 26 US states prohibit localities from passing their own laws regarding seed, farmers are often forced to become legally dependent on industrially produced seed
eco-campus and farm
10 acre teaching garden and 40 additonal acre, solar-powered farm growing organic, non-GMO, heirloom crops
pembroke farm restoration
working to restore what was the largest black farming community in the north, founded by runaway slaves in the 1860s
healthy food hub
devlivers and prescribes locally-produced healthy foods for underserved communities
skill-building and education
offers programs in sustainable agriculture and buildings, renewable energy, and resilience
solidarity economy
based on cooperation, sharing and living with enough
projects include cooperatives, publicly owned banks, participatory budgeting, and other projects that facilitate production and exchange that reinforce community and ecological sustainability
by re-embedding markets in communities and decommodifying exchange relationships
ecovillages
intentional communities that emphasize
leading from the grassroots rather than governments
valuing and practicing community living
prioritizing community self reliance for basic necessities such as food and water
nuturing a strong sense of shared vales- often chaarcterized in spiritual terms
and generating replicable models and educational experiences for others
ecovillage challenges - money
not yet accessible to all people, villagers need to work outside and inside village to pay rent and/or property taxes
ecovillage challenges - social relations
economic inequality (owners/tenants) creating hierarchy, lack of barries/private space, collective identity based on practicies and poltiics that vary among villagers
ecovillage challenges - zoning
hard to get approval for multi-family dwellings, non-standard building material, off-grid energy, animals, etc.
ecovillage challenges - diversity/equity
mostly white, middle-class participants
ecovillage challenges - self-sufficinecy
in urban settings, much materials, food, and money comes from scavenging or working outside the village; not enough space for sufficient crops/livestock
ecovillage challenges - scale
it can work for a couple dozen people, but can it work for everyone, everywhere?
ecovillage distopia
white middle class flight to suburban and rural villages leaves POC in substandard urban villages
ecological concerns used as an excuse to deny people electricity, plumbing, trash, sewage services
assumption of self-sustaining communities means no reason for welfare, food stamps, etc.
ecovillage autonomy and extreme ideology could lead to oppressive, cult-like conditions in some communities
climate justice alliance
unities 35 grassroots groups for low-income communities of color to claim leadership role in resisting harms and transforming their conditions
challenges to community resettlement
attachment to land and traditional subsistence is often part of community identity
government programs often focus on moving individuals rather than communities
communities can include tribal and non-tribal members, people who have already left, people who want to stay, and others who want to leave
many tribes like that on IDJC and Grand Bayou are not federally recognized, and other groups like vietnamese immigrants and gullah/geechee nation have no collective legal status
agreeing or considering relocation can endanger support and funding for adaptation and resilience
resettlement can be used to make way for gentrification
factors in la coastal erosion
canals build by fossil fuel companies cause erosion
levees along mississippi prevent silt from depositing to build up wetlands
over-development destroys wetlands that protect land from erosion
climate change: increased storm intensity, rising sea levels, etc.
tribal critisms of the relocation project
new community controlled by a nonprofit, not the tribe
some land is available for those who left in 2021, but leftover plots can be purchased by anyone
residents who cannot afford to pay taxes and insurance on homes will lose them
funding to build farmland, parks, and solar facility, but no money for maintenance and operation of them
narrative of tribal-led resettlement is in danger of blurring into one of public housing and dependency
those who resettle promise not to repair or develop their old homes, but other property owners can use and develop it for ecotourism
climate refugee narrative
reflects a tendency to promote future doomsday scenarios of climate change at the expense of addressing the historical processes and conditions that have produced coastal risks in the first place or the long duree of indigenous adaptation to forced displacement, land grabs, and unsustainable development
tribal leaders have also raised the concern that the attribution of this label to them
obscures recognition of their tribal sovereignty and frames them as in desperate need of saving, rather than solidarity
sustainable development and the green economy
natural environment viewed as an asset to be commodified in order to produce economic growth
new technologies will make current and increasing rates of growth and production sustainable
assumes that market-driven methods (cap-and-trade, etc.) are sufficient to control pollution and promote social justice
sustainable development = greenwashed economy?
does not address structural roots of poverty and unsustainability found in capitalism, colonial relations, nation-state structure, etc.
focuses on top-down governance and precedence of private capital without promoting local, direct democratic control, or inclusive procedures
does not recognize biophysical limits to economic growth which necessarily entails increasing material and enegry flowers
does not enable self-reliance, protect traditional cultures, or promote sustainable and accountable syste, of global governance that prioritizes human rights
non-capitlaistic economic relations
goods are exchanged to create and reinforce social and spiritual ties and profit can be stigmatized more than celebrated
unitarianism
is a factor in human decision making, but social, moral, and quality of life concerns also matter
ecological swaraj
collective autonomy, self-sufficiency, and mutual responsibility, not a unified movement but many local initiatives drawing from Gandhi’s ethics of anti-colonial local solidarity
buen vivir
“good” living based in the Quechua worldview that the Ecuadorian constitution describes as, “a new form of public coexistence, in diversity and in harmony with nature, to achieve the good way of living” in part by refusing to put a price on natural or human capital
ubuntu
“humanity” or “I am because we are” - traditional African notion of defining individuals by their communal identities that is the basis for mutual support
economy of mana
traditional Maori exchange built on wealth distribution ithat expresses interconnection of all beings
degrowth
requires substituting non-carbon-producing social benefits for ecnomic benefits which require material production
policies should focus on improving health, education, housing, and nutrition rather than increasing GDP through producing and selling things
indigenous
nature as shared “mother” spiritual reverence for nature
pro: incorporate shared indigenous ideas
con: not a concept familiar to everyone, can be alienating
scientific
preserving nature is necessary for human survival, scientific evidence for interdependence of living things
pro: empirically verifiable data
con: too much jargon, too many numbers, may alienate lesser educated or anti-intellectual
ethical
moral responsibility to future generations, and vulnerable communities and global south
pro: draws on universal human idea sof reciprocity, empathy
con: lack of awareness to produce empathy, and others have more empathy for economic problems
jurdical
humans have rights and depend on nature to fulfill them
pro: comes with legal apparatus to ban behavior and remediate harms
con: anthropocentric system and can be manipulated by moneyed interests
deep ecology
focuses on “root causes of Earth’s imbalance,” ”redesigning out whole system to align with values and methods that truly preserve the ecological and cultural diveristy of natural systems
shallow ecology
“tends to focus on short-term, surface-level changes, often promoting technological fixes”
green economy
of “payments for ecosystem services” offsets and carbon trading requires assessing the value of nature
ecofeminism
“examines feminism in relation to the
natural environment and lobbies for women’s ability to
engage with the earth, respond to, and solve ecological
crises.
ties exploitation of women and nature together, especially through labor tied to food
and seeks to envision ways of using this connection for empowerment instead
critiques of ecofeminism
emphasizes gender over race and class
developed and advanced by mostly white, middle class women from industrialized nations
can essentialize women by posting intrinsic feminine ties with the natural world, denying diversity of femininities
privledges shared bodily experiences over cultural contexts
posits an innate female ability/tendency to empathize with nature, female animals, etc.
can reinforce negative feminine stereotypes
eco-socialism
shares interest in decentrlaization, limiting private property, and practices of commoning with ubuntu and other indigenous ethics
democratic ecosocialism
“global economy oriented to meeting basic social needs”
• “social equality and social fairness”
• “public or socialized ownership of productive forces”
• “representative and participatory democracy
• “environmental sustainability”
• commitment to a safe climate
• national transformations as “part of a global process”
changing culture towards democratic ecosocialism
emissions taxes, social and racial justice movements
• anti-car movement
• renewable energy and green jobs
• reforestation, organic, fair trade, and sustainable agriculture
• “resistance to the capitalist culture of endless
consumption”
• anti-plastic bag, straws, styrofoam, etc. legislation
• “exploration of sustainable settlement patterns”
ecovillage distopia
white middle class flight to suburban and rural villages leaves POC in substandard urban villages
ecological concerns used as an excuse to deny people electricity, plumbing, trash, sewage services
• assumption of self-sustaining communities means no reason for welfare, food stamps, etc.
• ecovillage autonomy and extreme ideology could lead to oppressive, cult-like conditions in some communities
• state-run schemes could turn into coercive villigization and rationing of resources