1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Approaches to conscience in making moral decisions / moral guide
- Society-linked Approaches
- Reason-based Approaches
- "Voice of God" Approaches
- Psychological Approaches
- Situationist Approaches
Telling lies & Breaking promises: Society-Linked Approach
- Threatens the stability & flourishing of society
- Fear of punishment in an authoritarian environment might be the motive behind keeping promises & not telling lies

Telling lies & Breaking promises: Reason-Based Approach
- Conflicts with Aquinas' synderesis rule & primary precept of living in an ordered society, but an evasive truth is acceptable in exceptional circumstances
- Other theories might adopt a more proportionalist approach, e.g. Butler's reflective principle making lying the right thing in some circumstances

Telling lies & Breaking promises: "Voice of God" Approach
- Would normally be in line with Ten Commandments
- For modern thinkers, in exceptional situations its guidance may go against all accepted ethical rules

Telling lies & Breaking promises: Psychological Approach
- Lying & promise breaking not seen as moral issues
- Would be concern only if raised emotional issues of guilt, etc.

Telling lies & Breaking promises: Situationist Approach
- There is no absolute right/wrong
- For Flecther, it all depends on agaepic calculus' assessment of the situation

Adultery: Society-linked Approach
- In Western society, changed views on nature of marriage have made it more socially acceptable
- Other societies see it as a threat to the stability of society

Adultery: Reason-based Approach
- Also contradicts Aquinas' synderesis rule & primary precept of living in an ordered society
- Contrary to divine law's teachings on marriage & adultery
- Aquinas' example of marrying a widow, not knowing her husband was still alive, would not be blameworthy
- Butler's intuitive conscience would reject adultery as against the Bible

Adultery: "Voice of God" Approach
- Would normally be in line with Ten Commandments
- For modern thinkers, in very exceptional situations, its guidance might go against all accepted ethical rules

Adultery: Psychological Approach
- Adultery would not be seen as a moral issue
- For Freud, a guilty conscience arises out of accepting social restrictions intended to control expression of the id and the resultant sexual frustration

Adultery: Situationist Approach
- Once again, there is no absolute right/wrong
- All depends on agapeic calculus' assessment of the situation

Value of conscience as moral guide: Society-linked approach
- Collective conscience could unite society
- But this would have no value if the morality of that society was corrupt

Value of conscience as moral guide: Reason-based Approach
- Encourages objective approach to right/wrong
- However, conscience is NOT infallible: Emotions & social conditioning can also influence/distort it
- Many people do not have the capacity for the reasoned thinking demanded by, for example, Aquinas & Kohlberg

Value of conscience as moral guide: "Voice of God" Approach
- Can be subjective/unreliable
- Can we be sure it is truly God speaking to us & not our unconscious desires/prejudices?

Value of conscience as moral guide: Psychological Approach
- Feeling guilty can act as a warning/corrective
- May be both subjective & unreliable; many people experience feeling guilty without good reason

Value of conscience as moral guide: Situationist Approach
- Fletcher's view of conscience simply as a process of decision-making means it has no real significance
- It is just another word for application of the agaepic calculus
