U.S. Government: Religious Freedom, Polarization, and Executive Power

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/28

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:48 PM on 4/20/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

29 Terms

1
New cards

Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)

Strengthened protection of religious freedom and requires the government to prove a compelling interest using the least restrictive means

2
New cards

RFRA standard

Government must show a compelling interest and least restrictive means when burdening religion

3
New cards

Substantial burden

Government pressure to violate religious beliefs or face serious penalties

4
New cards

When RFRA cannot block a law

When the law protects public safety, health, or welfare in the least restrictive way

5
New cards

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014)

Supreme Court case allowing corporations to claim religious exemptions

6
New cards

David Post's view

Corporations should not be religious persons and the burden standard is too broad

7
New cards

Michael McConnell's view

Corporations are groups of people who retain religious rights

8
New cards

American Dream

The opportunity to work hard and build a better life

9
New cards

Why the American Dream is harder today

Economic inequality and limited opportunity

10
New cards

Barriers to the American Dream

Family income, race, and school quality

11
New cards

Robert Putnam's argument

Wealthy students succeed more due to resources and support

12
New cards

Why test scores don't explain success

They ignore advantages like wealth and social connections

13
New cards

Affective polarization

Emotional hostility and distrust between political parties

14
New cards

Examples of polarization

Avoiding the other party, moral distrust, unwillingness to compromise

15
New cards

Cause of polarization

Group identity and in-group vs. out-group thinking

16
New cards

Factors increasing polarization

Partisan media, political rhetoric, social sorting, echo chambers

17
New cards

Consequences of polarization

Gridlock, less cooperation, declining trust in institutions

18
New cards

Solutions to polarization

Bipartisan dialogue and emphasizing shared identity

19
New cards

Dehumanization

Treating opponents as less than human

20
New cards

Difference between dehumanization and disagreement

Dehumanization attacks humanity, not just ideas

21
New cards

Effects of dehumanization

Increased violence, deeper division, justification of harm

22
New cards

Role of political leaders in polarization

Their rhetoric shapes public attitudes and behavior

23
New cards

Abraham Lincoln executive power

Suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War

24
New cards

Franklin D. Roosevelt executive power

Expanded federal power through the New Deal and challenged the Supreme Court

25
New cards

George W. Bush executive power

Expanded surveillance and detention after 9/11

26
New cards

Joe Biden executive power

Attempted student loan forgiveness and used executive actions on policy issues

27
New cards

Donald Trump executive power

Declared national emergency for border wall and expanded immigration actions

28
New cards

When presidents expand power

During war, crises, or political gridlock

29
New cards

Concern about executive power

It can weaken checks and balances and bypass Congress