Critical Thinking

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/33

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:40 PM on 3/6/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

34 Terms

1
New cards
Proposition
A statement that expresses an idea that can either be true or false.
2
New cards
Premise indicator
Words or phrases that signal the presence of a premise in an argument, such as 'because', 'since', or 'for'.
3
New cards
Inference
The process of drawing a conclusion from premises or evidence.
4
New cards
Deductive reasoning
A type of reasoning where conclusions are derived from general premises, and the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.
5
New cards
Invalid reasoning
Reasoning where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises, even if the premises are true.
6
New cards
Valid reasoning
Reasoning where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, ensuring that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
7
New cards
Inductive reasoning
A type of reasoning that involves drawing general conclusions from specific examples or observations.
8
New cards
Cogent
A property of an inductive argument that is strong and has true premises.
9
New cards
Sound
A property of a deductive argument where the argument is valid and all its premises are true.
10
New cards
Denying the antecedent
A logical fallacy that occurs when one assumes that if 'if A then B' is true, then 'not A' means 'not B'.
11
New cards
Affirming the consequent
A logical fallacy that occurs when one assumes that if 'if A then B' is true, then 'B' implies 'A'.
12
New cards
The fallacy fallacy
The mistake of assuming that just because an argument contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.
13
New cards
Context collapse
The situation where different social contexts converge, causing a blending of expectations and norms, which can affect communication and behavior.
14
New cards
The principle of charity
Interpreting someone's statements in the most rational way possible, assuming good intentions, and giving the benefit of the doubt.
15
New cards
Confirmation bias
The natural tendency to minimize or ignore evidence contrary to one's beliefs while seeking out and relying on evidence that supports one's beliefs.
16
New cards
Representativeness
The tendency to apply a mental prototype from previous experience to interpret a new situation.
17
New cards
Cogency
A property of an inductive argument if it is strong and has true premises.
18
New cards
Availability
The tendency to interpret a new situation using information readily available, without considering additional information that may affect the situation.
19
New cards
Alief
A type of belief or attitude that is often unconscious and automatic, influencing behavior even if it conflicts with one's conscious beliefs.
20
New cards
Ad Hominem
A fallacy where the argument attacks a person’s character rather than addressing the argument itself.
21
New cards
Genetic Fallacy
A fallacy that involves dismissing or validating an argument based on its origin or source rather than its merit.
22
New cards
Straw Man
A fallacy that misrepresents or oversimplifies an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.
23
New cards
Red Herring
A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the original issue.
24
New cards
Irrelevant Appeals
Fallacies that use an appeal to irrelevant authority, emotion, or other factors to distract from the actual argument.
25
New cards
Equivocation
A fallacy that uses an ambiguous term or word in different ways to mislead or confuse the argument.
26
New cards
Appeal to Ignorance
A fallacy that argues that a lack of evidence against something proves it is true.
27
New cards
Slippery Slope
A fallacy that assumes a small action will lead to a series of negative consequences, without sufficient evidence.
28
New cards
Texas Sharpshooter
A fallacy where someone cherry-picks data or information to fit their argument, ignoring other contradictory evidence.
29
New cards
Post Hoc
A fallacy where one assumes that because event A happened before event B, A caused B.
30
New cards
Hasty Generalization
A fallacy that involves making a broad generalization based on a small or unrepresentative sample.
31
New cards
Presumption
A fallacy where one assumes something without proper evidence or argument.
32
New cards
Conjoint vs. Independent Support
The distinction between arguments that support each other and those that stand alone in providing separate evidence for a conclusion.
33
New cards
Argument Layers
The structure or hierarchy of reasons and evidence that support or oppose a conclusion in an argument.
34
New cards
Hidden Assumptions
Unstated beliefs or premises that are necessary for an argument to work but are not explicitly acknowledged.