1/125
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Behavioral genetics
study of how
genes and evenrioment interact to shape —> behavior
Heritability
Heritability
If aggression has high heritability:
👉 differences between people are mostly due to genes
NOT:
👉 “this person is aggressive because of genes only”
phenotype behavior
individuals observed beaver
genotype
genetic blue print you have
( DNA, alleles)
Behavioral variation —> where does it come from
👉 Why individuals behave differently
Caused by:
genes
environment
interaction of both
behavior ( phenotype). = G + E+ GEI
G= genotype
E=envrimetn ( what there eposes too).
GeI= Gene x enrioment interaction ( how genes responds to ebnrioemtn ).
Genetic basis of behavior — rodents why
rodents s
earliest evidence of genetic basis of hbeahor
BCCC —→ certain strains = consistent diffenceds in behavior
even though environment sales
SOOOO —→ has to be differences in genotype
Why useful:
If:
environment = same
behavior = different
👉 difference must be genetic
What are instincts
Insticnts
performed same wya every time
fully expeeressd the 1st time occur
appear even if indium raise in isolation n
separated into two key type
reflexed
Fixed action patterns
• Instinct
👉 Behavior you are born with
No learning needed
reflexes def
innovoaltuaty responses to a stimuli
( aka Blinkinging , flinchinG(.
Why this matters:
You didn’t learn it
You don’t think about it
Babies can do it
👉 Conclusion:
This behavior is built into your nervous system
→ which is built by genes
They are evidence.
They show:
👉 behavior can exist without learning
👉 therefore it must come from genetic programming
Fixed action patterns ( FAPS)
Fap
highly stereotyped behavior
once triggers —→ run to completion
little to no vairoatio across indivusal s
EX": goose rolls egg back into nest —>sa we Rome eggg mid action it will still do the same thing after
Why this is HUGE:
This shows behavior is:
pre-programmed
not flexible
not learned
👉 That’s basically like saying:
“this behavior is coded in DNA”.
They are evidence.
They show:
👉 behavior can exist without learning
👉 therefore it must come from genetic programming
instinct —→ ( innate bevhros evidences ).
Instinct ( Innate behaviors)
So how does this connect to genetics?
Here’s the logic chain your professor expects:
Some behaviors appear without learning
These behaviors are consistent across individuals
Therefore, they must be encoded biologically
Biology = genes
👉 Therefore: genes influence behavior
Genome
Genome
all dna in a orgais. ( genes / genit material
humans = 3.2 billion base pairs
when unzipped base pairs reveals )
Base pairs
unit of DNA
nucleotides bonds in Pairs ( across the 2 strands
A= t
C= G
order of pairs - genetic codes.
genes
Genes:
sections of Dna that code for something
Since Genomes are huge → how do we study them?
answer = genotyping
Genotyping
Definition:
Identifying differences in DNA sequence ( looking at genetic makeup)
👉 Basically:
“Reading someone’s genetic blueprint”
PCR
PCR ( polymerase - chain reaction)
one method of genotyping
amplifies DNA = makes easier to detect genes of interest
aka ( makes copies )
how —>
special machine heat and cool DNA in cycles
with each cycle = doubling number of dna copies
WHNE used ?
when you have tiny DNA samples
so you then make copies
allow to run different test and run them through this dna sample ( without ruin original asamle)
How does each cycle change DNA amount
How does each cycle change DNA amount
It doubles every cycle
So after many cycles:
👉 you go from tiny → millions of copies
Gel electorpheiireis.
Gel
one method of genotyping
seated dna by sizes
dna fragments —> pushed through gel electric field
small fragments = move faster
large = move slowr
good to camper dna size = aka identify ing specific genetic measurers
Why does DNA move in an electric field?
Why does DNA move in an electric field?
DNA is negatively charged
So:
👉 it gets pulled toward the positive sid
What can scientists infer from band patterns?
👉 If two samples have:
same bands → similar DNA
different bands → different DNA
DNA sequencing
DNA sequencing
one method of genotyping
reads order of base pairs in DNA —> reveals hgentic info ( aTCG)
use when you want *** ACTUAL GENETIC CODE
What can sequencing answer that PCR/gel can’t?
Exact mutations
👉 Exact differences
👉 Full genetic information
SNP
SNP ( single nuclide base difference ).
method of genotyping
looks for tiny dirnrece in genetic code btw individuals
small diffenc —> help identify traits / succepticvety to disease
Ex: one person = an and. another has = g
tiny change —→ can effect traits
like trying tot tell apart identical twin by a mole on their hand
thermocylc,er
machine that runs pCR
Mrna
messengfer copy of RNA
Real time PCR - ( qpCR)
PCR related time or quantitate ( QPCR)
method of genotyping
lets sicneitst measure amount of dna preent in REAL time ( aka dna that is active)
Which genes are active TRANSCRIBING —> giving us gene expression
**looking at mRNA —> bc thats indicator of DNA being active
Condors
🐦 SLIDES 29–31: Real example (Condors)
Population almost extinct → inbreeding risk ( from th programs)
Genotyped more than 900 captive and wild condors —→ over 30 years to monitor genetic diversity
how and what Used:
PCR- to genotype and ample micorsatelities (at 21 differt loci in gene)
Microsatellites= repeptivie DNA sequences ( frequently mutate thus useful for detecting variation in alleles )
PCR product place in —> Gel electrophoresis
👉 Found:
Some birds reproduced asexually (crazy) *PArtheogensiss.
microsatlitles
reep;tive dia sequences
highly polymorphic = the ability to exist in multiple forms, shape
thus key for losing at variotaio n
ex: ACACACACACA
Paetheonegoeniss.
candors have this
eggs not fertilized —→ offspring receive copies of only mothers allees
How do we figure put which genes are linked to a Trait
. Statistical. mehtos
GWAS ( genie wide association studies 0
QTL ( quantitative trait loci mapping)
****approaches for IDENTIFYINg genetic factors —.ASSOC with trait
Moleculemact method
gene edition
knouclt out
crisps
**Tech direly alter genetic seqiucnes to study —> FUNCTOM of genes
GWAS
GWAs:
** compares many to find genetic patterns ( DNA regions) that are linked to a —-.TRAITc
what it does:
Compare MANY unrelated individuals
With trait vs without
👉 Finds: associated regions ( corre,ation )
—
GWAS
👉 Compare DNA across MANY individuals
Goal:
👉 find variants linked to trait
QTLMappuing
QTL
What it does:
Uses related individuals (families)
to Tracks:
Inherited markers( passed down from parents)
links variation in traits —> to specific regions of genome
👉 Finds:
specific genomic regions - that are linked to the trait ( aka the neighborhood the trait lives in )
** if region consistory appears in indicual with trait = it is a QTL
**more controlled —> genetic controlled mroe similar — less noise eaisrt to identify
Quantitive trait
trait with range
ex : hheight, anxiety
genetic markers
DNA spots used as landmarks
knockout mehtod
Knockout:
turn gene off
observe changes —> infers function
CRISPR - CAS 9
CRISPR _ cas 9
cas9 = protein evolved that cuts out DNA
targeted SUPER preceded - dna editing
delet/ insert/ or CHNAGE
precise and felcixble
**observe changes = causation
Silver Fox expiemrnt
setup
breed foxes for tameness
and every geenatoon after ( bred only the tames 10% )
Results:
Behavioral changes:
Friendly
Less stress
social beahvrio ( wagging, licking , human interaction)
Physical changes:
Floppy ears
Coat color
Face shape
👉 Called:
**👉 Shows:
behavior genes affect other traits too
WHY ? —> DOMESYTICATION SNDORM
Domestication syndrome
Set of traits seen in domesticated animals
behavioral = tameness , reduced stress
physical: ears , tails , coat , skull shape
physiological: homoness, brain development
Orthologous chromosomes
Similar chromosomes across species
Des ire the Compassion of TAME vs AGressie foxes
compare the tame line and the aggressive line: ( wanted to test if doemsticaito left a gehenti c signature)
Hypothesis :
domesitactio —→ consistent genetic changes
aka selecting for tameness will lead to consistent genetic changes (domestication syndrome)
PREDICTION
SOOO—>
tame foxes will share certain DNA regions
agreewive foxes will have diffnet regions
AMD these direness should overlap when compares to the regions between dogs vs wolves )
What does “consistent change” mean?
nstead:
👉 the SAME regions of DNA keep showing up
🧬 How do they test that
“Is there a region of DNA that is ALWAYS inherited with the trait?
collected blood samples
usd PCR to amplify
QTL —> link DNA regions to behavior
RESULT:
Found region on chromosome VVU12
Same region differs in:
tame vs aggressive foxes
dogs vs wolves
**domesitacion = SHARED GENTIC BASIS
CHNAGE Is not random = DOemsitacitaon is constituent in difrnet separate domestication process
same genetic pathways eve among didn’t species.
** basally does doesmisito have visible simple rhcages in these differ animals is it CONSTIETN
Why do individuals respond differently to the same stimulus (like rollercoasters)
👉 Because of:
genes (some people are naturally more anxious/thrill-seeking)
environment (past experiences, upbringing)
interaction of both
Example:
Two people on a rollercoaster:
Person A → loves it
Person B → terrified
👉 Same stimulus, different response
➡ That’s behavioral variation
❓ How does behavioral genetics differ from just studying behavior?
👉 Regular behavior study:
What do animals do?
👉 Behavioral genetics:
Why do they behave that way genetically?
MPLE:
Behavior = observation
Behavioral genetics = DNA explanation
What questions does behavioral genetics aim to answer?
Examples:
Is this behavior inherited?
Which genes influence this behavior?
How much is genetics vs environment?
How do genes affect brain/behavior?
Why is heritability important for evolution?
Why is heritability important for evolution?
👉 Heritability = how much of a trait is genetic
Why it matters:
If a trait is genetic, it can be:
👉 passed down
👉 selected fo
Example:
If “tameness” is heritable:
tame animals reproduce more
👉 population becomes more tame over time
➡ evolutio
Can a trait have high heritability but still be influenced by environment?
YES (this is important)
Example: Height
strongly genetic
BUT
nutrition matters
Meaning:
👉 Genes set the range
👉 Environment affects the outcom
Why is behavior considered a phenotype?
Because it is:
observable
measurable
Examples:
aggression
anxiety
friendliness
👉 You can SEE behavior → it’s a phenotype
Can two people with the same genotype behave differently?
Yes
\
Identical twins:
same DNA
BUT
different environments
👉 different personalities/behaviors
Identical twins:
same DNA
BUT
different environments
👉 different personalities/behaviors
👉 Because environment is controlled
Meaning:
If:
same environment
different behavior
👉 difference must be genetic
Why does the goose example show genetic control
👉 Goose sees egg → rolls it back
Even if egg disappears:
👉 it keeps going
Meaning:
not thinking
not learning
not flexible
👉 hardwired behavior → genetic
“How do bioinformatics tools help researchers find behaviorally relevant mutations?”
Answer: they make it possible to search enormous genomes and filter millions of variants.
What is inside genomes
about 2% = genes
2–5% = DNA binding/regulatory signals
90%+ = other stuff, unknown function, spacers, retroviruses
**most DNA does not direly male proteins
** but non coding DNA still matters
Why is genome size a challenge?
Why is genome size a challenge?
If genomes are huge, how do we find the few DNA differences that actually matter?
How do bioinformatics tools help researchers find behaviorally relevant mutations?
They help by filtering enormous data down to a smaller list of possible important variants.
“How might non-coding DNA influence animal behavior?”
Answer
: non-coding DNA can regulate genes.
It can affect when, where, or how much a gene is turned on.
If that gene affects brain development, hormones, sensory systems, or neural circuits,—→ then non-coding DNA can influence behavior.
EX:
The protein-coding part is the lamp itself.
The non-coding control region is the light switch.
A behavior could change if:
the lamp is broken
OR the switch turns it on too much
OR the switch turns it on in the wrong place
OR the switch turns it on at the wrong time
How do genes “make things happen”?
**genes don’t act alone
behavior like aggression, migration, social boding , or volicaiton —> does not come from one gene
involves brain development, hormones, sensory input, encvirment, AND gene regulation
Example: aggression is not just “the aggression gene.”
Aggression could involve:
brain wiring
stress hormones
fear response
past experience
sensory perception
immune system
metabolism
So when the study guide says behavioral traits are often polygenic, it means:
Many genes contribute to the behavior.
**BEHAVIOR = Polygenic
Why is it important to consider environment when studying behavior?
Because behavior can change depending on
upbringing,
social conditions,
stress,
diet,
learning, and
surroundings
Why finding the important DNA change is hard
Because if you compare two animals, you may find thousands or millions of DNA differences.
Most of those differences do nothing obvious.
So the problem is not just finding differences.
The problem is figuring out:
Which difference actually matters for the trait?
Comparative genomics means
Comparing genomes across individuals, breeds, or species to see which DNA differences line up with traits.
For behavior, comparative genomics can help explain how behaviors evolved.
EX: If dogs are generally more tame than wolves, scientists can compare dog and wolf genomes to look for DNA regions involved in domestication.
Manhattan plots
The x-axis is different places in the genome.
The y-axis is how strongly each DNA difference is associated with the trait.
Tall peak = “look here, this genome region may matter.”
GWAS and Manhattan plots help identify statistical associations between genetic variants and traits.
For behavior, the same thing could be done:
If you have animals with a behavior and animals without it, you scan the genome and look for peaks.
Example:
Let’s say we look at ONE DNA variant:
Case 1:
90% of screw-tail dogs have it
5% of normal dogs have it
👉 That’s HIGH association
Case 2:
50% of both groups have it
👉 That’s NO association
“This DNA difference shows up a lot in dogs WITH the trait and not much in dogs WITHOUT it”
how does Recombination affects how traits and behaviors are inherited across generations.
Because recombination shuffles DNA blocks, scientists can use inherited blocks to locate trait-related regions.
DNA gets inherited in chunks.
So if a mutation causes a trait, nearby DNA pieces often travel with it.
Imagine a suspicious person is always seen with the same group of friends. Even if you do not know which person committed the crime, the group tells you where to look.
In genetics:
The “friends” are nearby DNA markers.
The “criminal” is the actual causal mutation
What kind of experimental designs strengthen conclusions about gene-behavior links?
A strong design compares many animals and looks for DNA regions consistently shared with the behavior.
Plain version:
Animals with the trait share a stretch of DNA.
The true cause is probably somewhere in that stretch.
MATHC case/control comparison
ACases = animals with the trait
B-Controls = animals without the trait
X= #cases individuals without variant
Y= #control cindivals without variant
(A/B)/ (X/Y)
f a DNA variant is common in cases and rare in controls, it may be associated with the trait.
xample:
Imagine 90 out of 100 aggressive animals have variant A.
Only 5 out of 100 calm animals have variant A.
That variant is suspicious
**DO MATH her
Screw tail expiemnt - finding variants.
What the researchers did
They used whole genome sequence data from 100 dogs from 21 breeds.
They compared dogs with screw tails to dogs without screw tails
AKA-What DNA differences do the screw-tail dogs share that the normal-tail dogs do not?
resulted in 20 million variants (SNP) /INDEL
For EACH variant, ask: who has it?
For every single variant, the software asks:
Do the screw-tail dogs have this variant?
Do the normal-tail dogs lack this variant?
Variant | Screw-tail dogs | Normal-tail dogs |
|---|---|---|
Variant A | mostly yes | mostly no |
the association score —> Manhattan plot ( is tis mostly found in dogs with or without ahtne plote0.
What aware the result form the screw tail excitement
Result
The Manhattan plot showed a big signal on chromosome 5 (dog)
That means:
“Something in this area is related to screw tail”
they ZOOME IN —> found DVL2 gene
inside - Frame shift Mutation ( delection of 1 base)
Plain version:
They found a suspicious DNA area, then inside it they found a gene with a mutation that could break the protein.
For EACH variant, they ask:
“Do dogs with screw tail have this more often than dogs without?”
fremshift mutation why bad
That missing base shifted how the DNA message was read and produced a shortened protein.
Imagine reading this sentence in groups of three letters:
THE CAT ATE THE RAT
Now delete one letter near the start:
THC ATA TET HER AT
Everything after the deletion gets messed up.
That is a frameshift.
If this happens in a gene, the protein may not work correctly.
How might a frameshift mutation in a developmental gene impact behavior?
f a gene helps build the nervous system, brain, sensory organs, or hormone pathways, breaking the protein could change behavior.
In the dog example, the obvious effect is body/tail shape, but if a similar mutation affected brain development, —→behavior could change to-
DLV1 and Human - significance
Example from your lecture🐶 Dogs:
Gene: DVL2
Mutation → screw tail / body shape changes
Humans:
Similar gene
Mutation → Robinow syndrome (affects body development)
💥 WHY this matters
It shows:
This gene is involved in body development in BOTH species
So the gene is not random—it has a real biological function
Example analogy:
Dog gene:
“build tail structure this way”
Human gene:
“build spine/body structure this way”
👉 Not identical
👉 But same type of instruction system
How can comparative genomics help us understand traits?
By comparing similar genes across species, scientists can identify genes that play important roles in development or behavior, since similar genes often perform similar functions.
What experimental designs strengthen conclusions about gene-behavior links?
What experimental designs strengthen conclusions about gene-behavior links?
Strong conclusions need more than a statistical association. You want:
clear phenotype
many individuals
good controls
biological mechanism
functional evidence
cross-species support if possible
Ethics — should we fix it? when identify a harmful trait -
For screw tail, the ethical question is about dog welfare.
If a trait causes medical problems, maybe we should stop breeding for it.
But if a gene affects multiple traits, changing it might have unexpected effects.
hat ethical issues arise when editing genes that influence animal behavior
ehavior-related editing is even more ethically complicated.
Example:
If we edit an animal to be less aggressive:
Is that improving welfare?
Or just making it easier for humans to control?
Could it affect fear, social bonding, survival, or stress?
Are we changing the animal for its benefit or ours?
Dire wolf
The claim was that scientists used ancient DNA and gene editing to create dire-wolf-like animals from gray wolves.
This matters because it asks:
If you edit DNA to create certain traits, have you recreated the animal?
The lecture is skeptical.
started with
sequencing
compare genomes
identify diffnece
decide which diffenced affect traits
In what ways can de-extinction fail to recreate behavioral traits?
Because even if you edit some genes for appearance, behavior depends on much more:
many genes
development
parents
learning
environment
social group
prey/predator ecology
brain wiring
full genome context
A gray wolf edited to look dire-wolf-like may not behave like a true dire wolf.
**Changing some visible traits is not the same as recreating a whole animal or its behavior.
What are challenges of studying polygenic behavioral traits?
Challenges:
many genes each have tiny effects
different genes interact
environment changes behavior
behavior is hard to measure
huge sample sizes are needed
associations may be weak
Communication
a dpecialized. signal produced by one individual —→which influences bevhior of another
signal
signal
evolved trait which actively sends info and affects receivers
ex: mating , dance ,alarm calls, pheromones
signaler
individual which produces the signal
receiver
idnivial detecting and responding to signs
Cue
passive info not evolved for communication but still —> useful to others
ex Vultures cueing scanvehenrgss to carcasses : Co2 attracts mosquitos
ex
Signal / cue / mniethier —> hawk circling causing mouse to hide
cue
hawk isn’t telling mouse —> mouse just reads the room passive info.
signal cue / neither —→ male frog mating call but it fails
signal
even if it fail it sis still community
signal, cue , neither —> yellow jacket color deters predators
signal
visual warning —> purposefully shaped by natal selection
influences bevahor of others —> stops pretors from eating it
How are signals perceived
perceived through 0-=——> sensory systems ( influence by enevrionebt stimulus)
sensory receptors —> nere endings that respond to internal/ external environmental stimulues
transmit info along axons to CNS —> response then generated for the stimuli
chemo receptors
chemoreceptors
detect chemical stimuli ( substances are released into environment —> detected by odor binding protein sin sensory structure)
how detected
olfaction : senses of emmet
gustation : detection of dissolved chemicals
sniffers / tasters
volatile chem signals
VOLATILE chem signal : signals transmitted really through water or air
pheromones
pheromosne s
volatiles ( gaseous) compounds
speciesrf specific
affect beavhiro of another individual fo the same species
can indicate -sex, food trails, predation ,etc
insects - pheromoens
insects
destroy 1/3 of food production
insectedcidt used widepsread
not species specific - can harm other psepcises
speed up evolution of resiticance by insects
Many insect use pheromones to find potential mates
SO hwo does pheromones and food production relate
release small amounts of sex pheromone onto orchid ( we disrupt mating)
aka confusion to males —> where alre females that im detecting
results = reduced predprcuotions And REDCUCED damage of CROPS
Waggle dance
Waggle dance = bee to be dance
scout bee performs waggle dance —> when found foos to brink other workers to get food.
describe tje waggel avance and the key details
waggle = conveys three key details
direction of waggle = direction of food source
duration of waggle = distance to food source
number of repetition = quality/ abundance of food
Dr.Nieh - what did they discover
social learning matters —> bees with ecxoencied teachers danced better
direction improves with teaching —> taught bees mores actuality signal food direction
distance is. trickier ——→ bees without teachers overshot the distance and diditn correct cover time
Overalll**
— TEAHERS = cricital for learning full dance accuracy
i*******mplications bees ma have a = CRITICAL LEARNING PERIODS and even ANIMAL CULTURE
Alarm calls
alarm calls
unique vocializaiton = produce by social animals
does when predator is nearby
ex: VERVERT monkerys - gvie specifc alarmscalls. —> based off predators ( trigger dijrnt survucal strategies)
is the alarm call — language ( monkeys0
does the alarm call descrive threat ( leopard ) OR just trigger reaction ( climb tree)
if describe threat = true symbolic communicate ( language)
if trigger bevahro = simple stimulus response
auditory mechanism
from = follows function ( all tuned for signals they need / aka range of frequency differs)
auditory receptors = specialized nerve cells that detect auditory signals
urban noise reshapes bird songs - GREAT TITS
observation
urban great tits sing with
higher min frequency
shorter , fstsrr songs ( compare to forest birds)
WHy
traffic noise —> masks low frequency sounds
birds adapt song to be heard over city noise
human change enviormnt —→ animals have to change hwo to communicate to survive
sparrow songs - pre covid
white crowned sparrow
urban areas males sing with
high min frequency
narrow frequency range
slower trill rates
**songs less effective at defending territories
ovid
ambient noise dropped
males sng more queitly —> heard twice as far
FWB= wide of signal
trill rate = how fast
photoreceptors
photo receptors
specialize neurons = sensitive to light
visual receptroes
two main types
rods = peripheral vision and low light
cones = color
*Variation within species = COLOR
humans have only 3 cones but some ,ay have three.
electrocrepctios
electro receptors
speculate sensor cells - detect electrical currents
most animals that have this - aquatic ( water conducts electric better than air)
most fish
some dolphin / platypuses
land exceptions -
echidnas = detect electric fields of prey with sensors ons outs
bees = sensory hairs detect e fields of flowers
used for
identifying species
finding mates
signaling motivational status
sensing envirmet conditions
electron organ discharge
sppecilaise electon organ signals —> for sensing and communicate
two groys pf fishes - elephatfish and Kingfish
evolved organs that produce electric
some species generate strong EOD - to stun
others produces weak EOD = detect prey , communicate
Can electric signals predict a fight
background
many species —> use signals to Asse search otehrs RHP ( resource holding potential = likely hod of winning a fight)
Hypotheiss
amaxozonina kiniffeish use EOD freuncyc to asses RHP
Preciditosn:
fish with higher frequency EOD = more succfpel at controlling access to a refuge
Method:
caught wild fish in Peru —. trandsfred to tail and recorded EOF frqucny
Paris of fish were then inrotudec simaltouslu to tank
interaction analyze
winner spent most time in refuge - initiated most headbutts
length of each fish recorded to make it fair
results:
relationship btw fish size and EOD frequencies
positively correlated = bigger fish make higher frequencies EOD
controlling access to refuge
winners had higher EOD frequencies
** but heres the next quesiton did they win bc of EOD or bc they big
Testing Fish EOD - Ases RHP
We want to test if they actually use EOD to measure RHP
method:
researchers tested if fish respond to EOD frequency indeptneit of body size
each fish exposes to recording of EOD signal ( didifnrt frequency)
order of rrequcny randomized
Reaserhcers analyze
number of headbutt = towards electrodes
time = spent near electors ( elector taxis).
Results
frequency of EOD recording = neg correlated with amount of time spent in playback area and number of headbutts
aka hella high oooh omg ima run away.
**Knifesuh use EOD frequency to asses RHP