failure of proof defences

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:43 PM on 5/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

14 Terms

1
New cards

What are the two types of defences ?

  • special

  • General

2
New cards

What is the general idea of failure of proof defences?

  • the prosecution failed to prove an element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt

  • General defence

3
New cards

What are the four main general defences?

  • intoxication

  • Insanity

  • Automatism

  • Age of responsibility

4
New cards

What are the two types of intoxication?

  • voluntary

  • Involuntary

5
New cards

Explain voluntary intoxication

  • defendant chooses to talk alcohol or drugs

  • Self induced

  • Only a potential defence to specific crimes

  • E.g murder and theft

  • They may avoid liability for the offence

6
New cards

Is voluntary intoxication a defence for basic intent crimes like assault and manslaughter, and why ?

  • no because becoming intoxicated is considered reckless

  • Basic intent crimes only require recklessness

  • No need for prosecution to prove foreseeability

7
New cards

Explain involuntary intoxication

  • the defendant did not knowingly or willingly become intoxicated

  • E.g drink getting spiked

8
New cards

When can involuntary intoxication be used as a defence?

  • both specific and basic intent crimes

  • If the defendant lacked the required men’s Rea

9
New cards

What is the defence of insanity and automatism?

  • where the defendant argued they should not be criminally liable

  • Because they lacked proper control or understanding of their actions

10
New cards

Explain the defence of insanity Test

  • M’Naghten rules: the defendant must show

  • A defect of reason

  • Caused by a disease of the mind

  • Meaning they either: did not know the nature of the act or did not know that the act was wrong

11
New cards

Explain automatism

  • when the defendant acted completely involuntarily

  • The actions were automatic

  • E.g muscle spasm

12
New cards

What are the two types of automatism?

  • Insane: caused by an internal factor such as epilepsy / this is treated as insanity

  • Non insane: caused by an external factor such as spiked medication/ this can lead to full acquittal

13
New cards

Explain the defence and consequence for non insane and insane automatism

Non insane: complete acquittal ( found not guilty, fully released)

Insane: special verdict (not guilty by insanity, detention possible)

14
New cards

Explain age of criminal responsibility

  • children under the age of 10 cannot be found guilty of an offence

  • Under the Young persons act 1933

  • Because of doli incapax : incapable of the crime