Modular vs non-modular processing in language

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/65

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:18 PM on 5/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

66 Terms

1
New cards

Why does the brain use different coding systems?

Different sensory modalities require different systems (visual, auditory, somatosensory etc.)

2
New cards

What does cognitive neuropsychology show about brain organisation?

The brain contains many highly specialised systems

3
New cards

Give examples of selective impairments supporting specialised systems?

Deficits in recognising faces, words, objects, colour, motion, spoken language, or specific semantic categories

4
New cards

What is word meaning deafness?

Poor understanding of spoken words despite intact hearing and written comprehension

5
New cards

What is category-specific anomia?

Difficulty naming items from a particular semantic category (e.g. fruits and vegetables)

6
New cards

What major question exists about specialised systems?

How information flows and interacts between them

7
New cards

What are the two broad views about interaction between systems?

Highly interactive processing vs limited/ modular processing

8
New cards

Which researchers argued for interactive speech perception?

McClelland, Miram & Holt (2006)

9
New cards

Which researchers defended limited interaction/ modularity

McQueen, Norris & Cutler

10
New cards

What is the classic limited-interaction theory called?

Fodorian modularity

11
New cards

According to Fodor, what are “vertical systems”?

Modular systems interfacing within the outside world

12
New cards

What systems are considered modular by Fodor?

Perceptual, language, and motor systems

13
New cards

What are perceptual systems broken into?

Subsystems such as colour, motion, 3D perception etc.

14
New cards

According to Fodor, how do modular systems behave?

Like automatic reflexes

15
New cards

Why are modular systems useful according to Fodor?

They are fast, automatic, and accurate

16
New cards

What famous quote reflects Fodor’s idea of modular perception?

“Prejudiced and wishful seeking makes for dead animals”

17
New cards

What are Fodor’s “horizontal systems”?

High-level non-modular systems involved in reasoning, memory, and problem-solving

18
New cards

What is the key question in Fodorian modularity?

How much knowledge/ belief influences perception

19
New cards

What is information encapsulation?

Modules operate with restricted access to information from other systems

20
New cards

Why are visual illusions important for modularity theories?

Illusions persist even when we know the truth

21
New cards

What does the Müller-Lyer illusion demonstrate?

Perception interprets contect rather than physical reality

22
New cards

Why are table-top illusions important?

Knowledge does not eliminate the illusion

23
New cards

According to Fodor, why do illusions persist?

Perceptual systems are partly immune to higher knowledge

24
New cards

What is “massive modularity”

The idea that the mind contains many evolved domain-specific modules

25
New cards

Which field strongly supports massive modularity?

Evolutionary psychology

26
New cards

Examples of proposed evolved modules?

Cheating detector and theory-of-mind modules

27
New cards

What limitation exists for evolutionary modularity theories?

Reading and writing are not evolutionary adaptions

28
New cards

What do neuroscientists often mean by modularity?

Domain-specific brain regions/ functions

29
New cards

Example of neuroscience “module”?

Visual word form area (VWFA)

30
New cards

What is Fodorian modularity mainly concerned with?

Online interaction between systems during processing

31
New cards

What is a top-down effect?

Higher-level information influencing lower-level perception

32
New cards

What are the three proposed views of speech perception interaction?

No feedback, lexical feedback only, or semantic feedback

33
New cards

What does the strict modular view claim about speech perception?

No lexical or semantic feedback affects phoneme perception

34
New cards

What processing sequence is proposed in strict modular models?

Phoneme → syllable → word → semantics

35
New cards

Which model argued feedback is unnecessary?

Norris, McQueen & Cutler (2000)

36
New cards

What does lexical-feedback theory propose?

Words can influence phoneme perception, but semantics cannot

37
New cards

Is lexical feedback compatible with Fodor?

Yes, if phonology and lexicon are within the same module

38
New cards

Which phenomenon strongly supports lexical feedback?

Phonemic restoration

39
New cards

What does sematic-feedback theory claim?

Meaning / context influence phoneme perception

40
New cards

Why is semantic feedback incompatible with Fodorian modularity?

It allows higher-level knowledge to penetrate perception

41
New cards

What is phonemic restoration?

The illusion where listeners “hear” missing phonemes replaced by noise

42
New cards

Why is phonemic restoration important theoretically?

It may demonstrate top-down processing

43
New cards

Does phonemic restoration necessarily prove semantic feedback?

No

44
New cards

What is selective adaption?

Repeated exposure to a phoneme changes later phoneme perception

45
New cards

Example: What happens after repeated exposure to /d/?

People require stronger /d/ evidence to hear /d/

46
New cards

Why does selective adaption occur?

The phoneme detector becomes fatigued/ habituated

47
New cards

In selective adaption experiments, what do participants classify?

Sounds along a phoneme continumm (e.g. /b/-/d/)

48
New cards

What is a phoneme continuum?

Gradual acoustic steps between two phonemes

49
New cards

Which phonetic feature differs between /b/ and /d/?

Place of articulation

50
New cards

What is the place of articulation for /d/?

Alveolar

51
New cards

What is the place of articulation for /b/?

Bilabial

52
New cards

What key question did Samuel (1997) ask?

Can restored phonemes produce adaption effects?

53
New cards

Why is this important?

It tests whether top-down restoration affects phoneme representations

54
New cards

What happened in the standard adaption condition?

Real /d/ sounds produced normal adaption

55
New cards

What happened when /d/ was replaced by noise?

Adaption still occurred due to phoneme resotration

56
New cards

What happened when /d/ was replaced by silence?

No adaption effect occurred

57
New cards

What does Samuel’s study suggest?

Lexical activation can influence phoneme perception

58
New cards

What is pause detection?

Measuring how quickly listeners detect a silence in speech

59
New cards

What affects pause detection speed?

Amount of lexical-phonological activation

60
New cards

What is an early unique word?

A word identifiable early because few alternative share its beginning

61
New cards

What is a late unique word?

A word identifiable only near the end because many competitors exisit

62
New cards

Why are pauses harder to detect in late unique words?

More lexical competitors are activated

63
New cards

Why does context help late unique words more?

Because many lexical competitors exist

64
New cards

Why is context less important for early unique words?

Lexical information already strongly contains possibilities

65
New cards

What do context effects suggest?

Semantic/ sentential context constrains lexical activation

66
New cards

What do ERP studies suggest about contect effects?

Context influences speech perception very early in processing