1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Quantitative Research
Often called the “traditional method,” it involves testing theories using numbers. The researcher manipulates an independent variable to determine its effect on a measured dependent variable, often seeking to establish a cause-and-effect relationship.
Qualitative Research
This approach tests theories using language rather than numbers. It focuses on broad descriptions and understanding complex phenomena through interviews and thematic analysis of experiences and attitudes. Participants are typically selected purposefully rather than randomly
Quantitative Designs (by Bias Control)
Studies are ranked based on their ability to minimize bias—systematic deviations from the truth caused by uncontrolled influences
Experimental Designs (True Experimental/RCT)
These aim to demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship by randomly assigning participants to two or more groups and purposefully manipulating an independent variable. The Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is the gold standard for maximizing internal validity
Quasi-Experimental Designs
These maintain controlled manipulation of the subjects but lack randomization or a second comparison group
Single-System (Single-Subject) Design
A type of quasi-experimental design where one subject (or a few) receives both experimental and control conditions in an alternating fashion to understand a process or a novel intervention
Nonexperimental (Observational) Designs
These lack controlled manipulation. Group assignment is predetermined based on naturally occurring characteristics, such as a specific diagnosis or age.
Physiologic (Basic Science) Studies
Highly controlled laboratory research focused on cellular, anatomic, or physiologic systems rather than person-level function
Case Reports
Detailed descriptions of the clinical management of a single unusual case or an infrequently encountered condition
What are timing and duration designs?
Prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, longitudinal
Prospective Design
Researchers collect new data in real time by following subjects forward over a specified period
Retrospective Design
Researchers use historical (past) data from sources such as medical records or insurance claims
Cross-Sectional Study
Data is collected about a phenomenon at a single point in time or once within a single defined interval
Longitudinal Study
A phenomenon is studied over an extended period of time to observe changes (e.g., following a patient for a year after surgery)
Secondary (Pre-Appraised) Evidence
These sources summarize and appraise groups of primary studies to provide definitive answers.
Systematic Review
A method where a collection of individual studies is gathered and critically appraised to reach an unbiased conclusion about the cumulative weight of evidence on a topic
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review that includes a statistical component by combining data from multiple studies to present an overall result
Clinical Practice Guidelines (Summaries)
Systematically developed statements that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care, informed by systematic reviews and expert opinion.
Narrative Review
A description of prior research without a systematic search strategy or critical appraisal of study merits
What are specialized study types?
Diagnostic accuracy, methodological study, outcomes research
Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Determines how good a particular "index test" is at detecting a condition compared to a "reference standard" (gold standard).
Methodological Study
Any research study that investigates the reliability and/or validity of clinical and research measures
Outcomes Research
Focuses on the "actual results" of implementing care, such as improvements in function, participation, or quality of life
Qualitative Research Hierarchy
Level I: Generalizable Studies
Level II: Conceptual Studies
Level III: Descriptive Studies
Level IV: Single Case Study
Level I: Generalizable Studies
Comprehensive studies using theory-focused sampling to capture a diversity of experiences
Level II: Conceptual Studies
Use theoretical concepts to guide sample selection, often focused on a specific group.
Level III: Descriptive Studies
Samples are selected to illustrate practical issues, often using quotes to represent themes
Level IV: Single Case Study
Provides rich data on the unique experiences of one person.