1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Case Studies
The detailed study of a single individual, institution or event with information gathered by a range of sources (eg. Indv/family) using many techniques (eg. interviews/observations). They are usually longitudinal
Longitudinal
When a study is conducted/ events is followed for an extended period of time to observe long-term effects.
Case studies - Pro - Rare+ethics
One strength of case studies is that they allow experiences that are otherwise rare or cannot be generated ethically for an experiment to be investigated. For example, HM is a case study with an individual that had their hippocampus removed to aid with seizures. An experiment could not ethically justify the hippocampus’ removal to investigate its effects on memory, but this case study allowed this rare situation to be investigated and therefore valuable findings about memory could be discovered. Therefore, case studies enable otherwise impossible research that can have significant findings.
Case Studies - Con - external validity
One weakness of case studies is that it is often difficult to generalise their findings to the wider population as individuals studied often have unique characteristics that could differentiate their results from what would be found in the rest of the population (eg. HM had experienced severe seizures before his surgery which may have influenced his memory separately from the hippocampus removal). Therefore, case studies produce findings with a low external validity and therefore they have limited use.
Case Studies - Con - Internal Validity
One weakness of case studies is that they are prone to investigator effects. As researchers get to know the individual and the case study they can overlook certain aspects of findings due to developing a bias. Therefore, the internal validity of case studies’ findings may be low.
Content Analysis
A method of qualitative data analysis/ research technique in which people are studied indirectly via the communications they produce. The aim of CA is to summarise communication in a systematic way (coded in categories) so conclusions can be drawn. It involves 6 steps. - Essentially qualitative data is converted into quantitative data.
Types of communication that can be analysed by content Analysis
Spoken communication - eg conversation/speech
Written communication - eg emails / text messages
Broader media examples - eg books / TV
Interview +/or Observations
CONTENT ANALYSIS - STEPBYSTEP
Categories are chosen
Pilot study is conducted
Communication is analysed by recording (tallying) each instance of the chosen category (CODING)
The total in each category is counted
Inter-rater reliability (degree of agreement/consistency) is checked
Quantitative data analysis techniques are used to compare the different categories
Content Analysis - Coding
Organising the means of communication info chosen categories which are tallied in every instance of occurrence. These categories are themes etc. (NOT THE TYPE OF QUALITATIVE DATA)
Peer review
A four step process/system used to determine if a scientific report can be published in a scientific journal. It is used to prevent unscientific research from entering the public domain and being accepted as fact. In funding circumstances it can be used to evaluate proposed research designs (seeking funding).
Peer Review - Steps
Journal editor sends report to OTHER psychologists (working in a similar field)
Peer considers the report’s VALIDITY, SIGNIFICANCE, METHODS and ORIGINALITY.
Peer gives the editor a RECOMMENDATION to either: accept the report unconditionally, accept if improved, reject but suggest revision and reject outright)
Editor decides whether to PUBLISH the work, based on the recommendation.
Peer review - Con - Slow
Peer review is a slow process that can sometimes take months or years to complete
Peer Review - Con - Obscure
In obscure research areas it may not be possible to find someone with sufficient knowledge to carry out a proper peer review
Implications for Economy - Employment
When there are higher rates of employment more is contributed to the economy in a cycle of production, tax and wages. Therefore, when psychological research can result in higher employment this can improve the economy.
Implications for Economy - Healthcare Treatments
Providing Healthcare treatments (eg CBT) is a huge financial burden on the NHS. But, if people are well there is less absenteeism and improved productivity for those in employment which boosts the economy.