1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Payback period strength
simple and fast
Payback period weakness
economically unsound because it ignores all cash flow after the cutoff date and it ignores the time value of money.
Discounted payback period strength
incorporates the time value of money
Discounted payback period weakness
ignores cash flow after the cutoff date
NPV strength
Economically sound and properly ranks projects across various sizes, time horizons, and levels of risk for all
IRR strength
provides a single measure (return)
IRR weakness
has the potential for errors in ranking projects. It can also lead to an incorrect selection when there are two mutually exclusive projects, or incorrect acceptance or rejection of a project with more than a single IRR.
MIRR strength
in general corrects for most of, but not all, the problems of IRR and gives the solution in terms of a return
MIRR weakness
The reinvestment rate may or may not be appropriate for the future cash flows
PI strength
incorporates risk and return
PI weakness
The benefits-to-cost ratio is actually just another way of expressing the NPV.